League Two·
Regular Season - 13·10/22/2024·14:45
Tranmere
Tranmere
WLWDD
0-1
Finished
HT0-0
Grimsby
Grimsby
LWLLW
📍 Prenton Park, Birkenhead, Merseyside
Season statsLeague Two
Tranmere11matchesGrimsby12matches

Every panel below reflects each team's matches in League Two.

Coverage varies by leaguetop-tier competitions have richer per-match data; lower divisions and smaller leagues track fewer metrics, so some panels may be sparse or missing entirely.
Pre-match snapshotevery value reflects each team's state going into kick-off — frozen before the match starts, not updated live.

Overall

Overallteam-strength snapshot
54%
Overall

Composite team strength — average of LTQ and Hype.

44%
1424
ELO

Chess-style strength rating going into kick-off.

1383
47%
LTQ

Long-term quality across all competitions.

46%
60%
Hype

Short-term fixture buzz / excitement signal.

42%
2.41
Momentum

Recent goal-scoring trend (weighted goals signal).

3.30

Match Outcome

Match Outcomeresults breakdown
1112
1.27
Points per Game

Average points per match across the sampled games (max 3).

1.50
27%
Win Rate

Share of sampled matches won.

50%
45%
Draw Rate

Share of sampled matches that ended level.

0%
27%
Loss Rate

Share of sampled matches lost (lower is better).

50%
36%
Clean Sheet27%

Share of matches with no goals conceded.

17%
55%
Failed to Score

Share of matches where the team didn't score (lower is better).

17%

Goal Scoring

Goal Scoringattacking output
1112
0.64
Avg Goals Scored

Goals scored per match across the sampled games.

1.33
45%
Scored > 0.564%

Share of matches where the team scored at least once.

83%
64%
Over 1.569%

Share of matches with total goals > 1.5.

75%
36%
Over 2.556%

Share of matches with total goals > 2.5.

75%
0%
Over 3.517%

Share of matches with total goals > 3.5 — high-scoring affairs.

33%
36%
BTTS52%

Share of matches where both teams scored.

67%
18%
BTTS & Win

Share of matches won while both teams scored — strong attack with a defensive lapse.

33%
0%
Scored Both Halves13%

Share of matches with a goal in both the 1st and 2nd half.

25%

Defensive Solidity

Defensive Soliditygoals & shots conceded
1112
1.09
Avg Goals Conceded

Goals conceded per match (lower is better).

1.83
12.55
Avg Shots Conceded

Total shots faced per match — defensive pressure (> 17.5/match is heavy siege).

13.17
3.73
Avg SoT Conceded

Shots on target faced per match — quality of chances given up (> 5.5 is severe).

4.42
2.73
Avg Saves

Goalkeeper saves per match (> 4.5 means the keeper is doing heavy lifting).

2.50
73%
Save %65%

Share of opponent shots on target stopped by the keeper.

57%
36%
Clean Sheet27%

Share of matches with no goals conceded.

17%

xG Trends

xG TrendsEWMA-smoothed performance
1112
1.22
EWMAxG For

Smoothed expected goals created per match — top attacks hit > 2.5/match, mid-table sits around 1.4.

1.45
1.75
EWMAxG Against

Smoothed expected goals conceded per match — elite defenses < 1.0, struggling sides > 2.0.

2.26
-0.52
EWMAxG Diff

Net xG: attack minus defense. ±1 is dominant/poor; ±2 is title-contender or crisis-level.

-0.81
-0.18
EWMAFinishing Edge

Goals scored minus xG. +0.3 is clinical, −0.3 is wasteful; ±1 is statistical outlier.

-0.25
0.10
EWMAxG per Shot

Average chance quality per attempt — 0.10 is mid, 0.15+ means the team only shoots from dangerous spots.

0.14

Shots Quality

Shots Qualityvolume & accuracy
1112
10.91
Avg Shots

Total shots per match — pure attacking volume (> 16.5/match is elite).

9.58
3.09
Avg Shots on Target

Shots on target per match — strikes the keeper had to handle (> 5.5/match is heavy).

3.67
6.82
Avg Shots in Box

Shots taken from inside the penalty area — proximity to goal (> 8.5/match means consistent box presence).

7.00
63%
Box Shot %68%

Share of shots taken from inside the box — chance-selection quality. Mid sits ~60%, elite > 75%.

73%
28%
On-Target %33%

Share of shots that hit the target — striking accuracy. Mid ~33%, elite > 40%.

38%
6%
Shot Conversion10%

Goals per shot taken — clinical efficiency. ~10% is league average, > 15% is elite finishing.

14%

Possession & Passing

Possession & Passingball control
1112
49%
Avg Possession

Share of match time with the ball. > 55% is dominant, < 40% is reactive.

49%
68%
Pass Accuracy

Share of passes completed — distribution quality. Mid sits ~80%, elite > 88%.

71%
354.45
Avg Passes

Total passes attempted per match — distribution volume. Top sides > 550, bottom sides < 400.

351.17
-0.01
EWMAPossession Trend

Smoothed possession differential — team minus opponent. ±0.1 is normal, ±0.2 is strong dominance.

-0.04

HT / FT Patterns

HT / FT Patternshalf-time vs full-time outcomes
1112
27%3/11
Leading at HT30%

Share of matches the team led at halftime — fast-start signal.

33%4/12
45%5/11
Level at HT

Share of matches level at halftime — balanced or low-tempo openings.

17%2/12
27%3/11
Trailing at HT

Share of matches the team trailed at halftime — slow starts (lower is better).

50%6/12
64%7/11
HT/FT Same Outcome69%

Share of matches where the W/D/L state at halftime matched the full-time result — game-state stability.

75%9/12
67%2/3
Led at HT → Won83%

Of matches led at HT, share converted into a full-time win — closing strength.

100%4/4
33%1/3
Trailed at HT → Recovered25%

Of matches trailing at HT, share rescued to a draw or win — comeback resilience.

17%1/6

Goal Timing

Goal Timingwhen goals happen
events 11/1112/121112
25%
0-15'16%

Hot starts — share of the team's goals scored in the opening 15 minutes.

6%
13%
16-30'16%

Early control — share scored between the 16th and 30th minute.

19%
13%
31-45'19%

Pre-HT push — share scored in the run-up to halftime.

25%
13%
46-60'19%

Restart wave — share scored in the first 15 minutes after HT.

25%
13%
61-75'6%

Game-state shift — share scored between minutes 61 and 75.

0%
25%
76-90+'25%

Late-game finishers — share scored from the 76th minute onwards (incl. stoppage time).

25%

First-Goal Edge

First-Goal Edgewho strikes first
events 11/1112/121112
50%4/8
Scored First46%

Share of matches where the team opened the scoring — fast-start signal.

42%5/12
50%4/8
Conceded First

Share of matches where the team conceded the opening goal (lower is better).

58%7/12
75%3/4
Win when Scoring First88%

Of matches the team scored first, share converted into a win — closing strength after the opener.

100%5/5
0%0/4
Win when Conceding First7%

Of matches conceding first, share rescued into a win — comeback strength.

14%1/7
28'
Avg Min. 1st Goal Scored

Average minute of the team's first goal — earlier means faster starters.

29'
25'
Avg Min. 1st Goal Conceded

Average minute of the first goal conceded — later is better (defense holds longer).

19'

Late-Game Strength

Late-Game Strengthafter the 75th minute
events 11/1112/121112
18%2/11
Scored after 75'22%

Share of matches with a late goal scored by the team — late finishers signal.

25%3/12
27%3/11
Conceded after 75'

Share of matches the team conceded a late goal — late-game vulnerability (lower is better).

25%3/12
67%2/3
Lead Saved after 75'83%

Of matches leading at 75', share closed out for a win — closing strength.

100%5/5
33%1/3
Lead Lost after 75'

Of matches leading at 75', share dropped to a draw or loss — late-game collapse risk.

0%0/5
18%2/11
Any Goal in Stoppage Time

Share of matches with any goal in stoppage time (90+) — late-drama frequency.

17%2/12

Set Pieces

Set Piecespenalty / own-goal share
events 11/1112/121112
88%7/8
Open-Play Share91%

Of the team's scored goals, share from open play — non-set-piece scoring quality.

94%15/16
0%0/8
Penalty Share

Of the team's scored goals, share from penalty kicks — penalty dependency.

6%1/16
13%1/8
Opp Own-Goal Bonus

Of the team's scored goals, share that were opponent own-goals — pressure / fortune.

0%0/16
0%0/11
Penalty Conceded Share

Of conceded goals, share from opponent penalties — defensive discipline (lower is better).

0%0/22
0%0/11
Own-Goal Cost

Of conceded goals, share that were the team's own goals — pressure-induced errors (lower is better).

0%0/22

Corners

Cornersset-piece pressure
1112
6.18
Avg Corners For

Average corners won per match — attacking territorial pressure (> 5.5 is heavy).

4.17
4.82
Avg Corners Against

Average corners conceded per match — territorial pressure faced (lower is better).

5.50
56%
Corner Share50%

Share of total corners in the team's matches that went to the team — territorial dominance ratio.

43%
1.06
EWMACorners Diff

Smoothed corner differential per match — long-term territorial advantage (±2 is strong).

-0.90
82%9/11
Match Corners > 8.574%

Share of matches with total corners > 8.5 (Over 8.5 line) — high-tempo encounter signal.

67%8/12
73%8/11
Match Corners > 9.561%

Share of matches with total corners > 9.5 (Over 9.5 line).

50%6/12
36%4/11
Match Corners > 10.531%

Share of matches with total corners > 10.5 (Over 10.5 line) — corner-heavy clashes only.

25%3/12

Cards & Discipline

Cards & Disciplineyellows, reds & fouls
events 11/1112/121112
1.91
Avg Yellow Cards

Yellow cards picked up per match — discipline signal (lower is better).

2.92
0%0/11
Red Card Match Rate

Share of matches with at least one red card to the team — sending-off risk.

17%2/12
11.00
Avg Fouls

Fouls committed per match — aggression / tactical-foul tendency (lower is calmer).

12.08
75%6/8
Match Cards > 3.588%

Share of matches with total card points (both teams, yellow=1 / red=2, 2Y→R counted as 2) > 3.5 — Over 3.5 line.

100%9/9
8/119/12
50%4/8
Match Cards > 4.575%

Share of matches with total card points > 4.5 — Over 4.5 line.

100%9/9
8/119/12
58%
Cards in 2nd Half

Share of card events that occur after halftime — late-discipline tendency.

65%

Venue Edge

Venue EdgeTranmere at home · Grimsby on the road
56
1.20
PPG at Venue

Points per match at the venue — home team at home, away team away.

1.50
20%1/5
Win Rate35%

Share of sampled matches won.

50%3/6
20%1/5
Loss Rate

Share of sampled matches lost (lower is better).

50%3/6
0.40
Avg Goals Scored

Goals scored per match across the sampled games.

1.33
0.60
Avg Goals Conceded

Goals conceded per match (lower is better).

1.67
60%3/5
Clean Sheet38%

Share of matches with no goals conceded.

17%1/6
20%1/5
BTTS43%

Share of matches where both teams scored.

67%4/6
0%0/5
Over 2.533%

Share of venue matches with total goals > 2.5.

67%4/6
1.52
EWMAAttack xG (EWMA)

Smoothed xG created at venue — long-term attacking strength in this fixture's venue context.

1.36
1.43
EWMADefense xG (EWMA)

Smoothed xG conceded at venue — defensive strength in this fixture's venue context (lower is better).

1.67