League One·
Regular Season - 11·11/26/2024·14:45
Barnsley
Barnsley
LDWWL
2-2
Finished
HT1-0
Reading
Reading
WWDLW
📍 Oakwell, Barnsley, South Yorkshire
Season statsLeague One
Barnsley16matchesReading15matches

Every panel below reflects each team's matches in League One.

Coverage varies by leaguetop-tier competitions have richer per-match data; lower divisions and smaller leagues track fewer metrics, so some panels may be sparse or missing entirely.
Pre-match snapshotevery value reflects each team's state going into kick-off — frozen before the match starts, not updated live.

Overall

Overallteam-strength snapshot
56%
Overall

Composite team strength — average of LTQ and Hype.

70%
1507
ELO

Chess-style strength rating going into kick-off.

1571
52%
LTQ

Long-term quality across all competitions.

65%
59%
Hype

Short-term fixture buzz / excitement signal.

74%
2.38
Momentum

Recent goal-scoring trend (weighted goals signal).

2.68

Match Outcome

Match Outcomeresults breakdown
1615
1.62
Points per Game

Average points per match across the sampled games (max 3).

1.73
44%
Win Rate

Share of sampled matches won.

53%
31%
Draw Rate

Share of sampled matches that ended level.

13%
25%
Loss Rate

Share of sampled matches lost (lower is better).

33%
19%
Clean Sheet19%

Share of matches with no goals conceded.

20%
19%
Failed to Score

Share of matches where the team didn't score (lower is better).

13%

Goal Scoring

Goal Scoringattacking output
1615
1.50
Avg Goals Scored

Goals scored per match across the sampled games.

1.60
81%
Scored > 0.584%

Share of matches where the team scored at least once.

87%
94%
Over 1.590%

Share of matches with total goals > 1.5.

87%
63%
Over 2.561%

Share of matches with total goals > 2.5.

60%
19%
Over 3.523%

Share of matches with total goals > 3.5 — high-scoring affairs.

27%
63%
BTTS65%

Share of matches where both teams scored.

67%
25%
BTTS & Win

Share of matches won while both teams scored — strong attack with a defensive lapse.

33%
50%
Scored Both Halves42%

Share of matches with a goal in both the 1st and 2nd half.

33%

Defensive Solidity

Defensive Soliditygoals & shots conceded
1615
1.25
Avg Goals Conceded

Goals conceded per match (lower is better).

1.47
10.44
Avg Shots Conceded

Total shots faced per match — defensive pressure (> 17.5/match is heavy siege).

13.73
3.69
Avg SoT Conceded

Shots on target faced per match — quality of chances given up (> 5.5 is severe).

5.20
2.38
Avg Saves

Goalkeeper saves per match (> 4.5 means the keeper is doing heavy lifting).

3.60
64%
Save %67%

Share of opponent shots on target stopped by the keeper.

69%
19%
Clean Sheet19%

Share of matches with no goals conceded.

20%

xG Trends

xG TrendsEWMA-smoothed performance
1615
1.66
EWMAxG For

Smoothed expected goals created per match — top attacks hit > 2.5/match, mid-table sits around 1.4.

2.08
1.78
EWMAxG Against

Smoothed expected goals conceded per match — elite defenses < 1.0, struggling sides > 2.0.

1.47
-0.12
EWMAxG Diff

Net xG: attack minus defense. ±1 is dominant/poor; ±2 is title-contender or crisis-level.

0.61
-0.25
EWMAFinishing Edge

Goals scored minus xG. +0.3 is clinical, −0.3 is wasteful; ±1 is statistical outlier.

-0.35
0.13
EWMAxG per Shot

Average chance quality per attempt — 0.10 is mid, 0.15+ means the team only shoots from dangerous spots.

0.15

Shots Quality

Shots Qualityvolume & accuracy
1615
13.25
Avg Shots

Total shots per match — pure attacking volume (> 16.5/match is elite).

12.93
4.81
Avg Shots on Target

Shots on target per match — strikes the keeper had to handle (> 5.5/match is heavy).

4.47
8.31
Avg Shots in Box

Shots taken from inside the penalty area — proximity to goal (> 8.5/match means consistent box presence).

7.60
63%
Box Shot %61%

Share of shots taken from inside the box — chance-selection quality. Mid sits ~60%, elite > 75%.

59%
36%
On-Target %35%

Share of shots that hit the target — striking accuracy. Mid ~33%, elite > 40%.

35%
11%
Shot Conversion12%

Goals per shot taken — clinical efficiency. ~10% is league average, > 15% is elite finishing.

12%

Possession & Passing

Possession & Passingball control
1615
50%
Avg Possession

Share of match time with the ball. > 55% is dominant, < 40% is reactive.

49%
71%
Pass Accuracy

Share of passes completed — distribution quality. Mid sits ~80%, elite > 88%.

76%
337.94
Avg Passes

Total passes attempted per match — distribution volume. Top sides > 550, bottom sides < 400.

378.87
0.00
EWMAPossession Trend

Smoothed possession differential — team minus opponent. ±0.1 is normal, ±0.2 is strong dominance.

0.02

HT / FT Patterns

HT / FT Patternshalf-time vs full-time outcomes
1615
56%9/16
Leading at HT51%

Share of matches the team led at halftime — fast-start signal.

47%7/15
31%5/16
Level at HT

Share of matches level at halftime — balanced or low-tempo openings.

20%3/15
13%2/16
Trailing at HT

Share of matches the team trailed at halftime — slow starts (lower is better).

33%5/15
63%10/16
HT/FT Same Outcome61%

Share of matches where the W/D/L state at halftime matched the full-time result — game-state stability.

60%9/15
67%6/9
Led at HT → Won69%

Of matches led at HT, share converted into a full-time win — closing strength.

71%5/7
0%0/2
Trailed at HT → Recovered10%

Of matches trailing at HT, share rescued to a draw or win — comeback resilience.

20%1/5

Goal Timing

Goal Timingwhen goals happen
events 16/1615/151615
17%
0-15'15%

Hot starts — share of the team's goals scored in the opening 15 minutes.

13%
17%
16-30'21%

Early control — share scored between the 16th and 30th minute.

25%
25%
31-45'23%

Pre-HT push — share scored in the run-up to halftime.

21%
17%
46-60'15%

Restart wave — share scored in the first 15 minutes after HT.

13%
4%
61-75'10%

Game-state shift — share scored between minutes 61 and 75.

17%
21%
76-90+'17%

Late-game finishers — share scored from the 76th minute onwards (incl. stoppage time).

13%

First-Goal Edge

First-Goal Edgewho strikes first
events 16/1615/151615
63%10/16
Scored First61%

Share of matches where the team opened the scoring — fast-start signal.

60%9/15
38%6/16
Conceded First

Share of matches where the team conceded the opening goal (lower is better).

40%6/15
70%7/10
Win when Scoring First74%

Of matches the team scored first, share converted into a win — closing strength after the opener.

78%7/9
0%0/6
Win when Conceding First8%

Of matches conceding first, share rescued into a win — comeback strength.

17%1/6
24'
Avg Min. 1st Goal Scored

Average minute of the team's first goal — earlier means faster starters.

29'
41'
Avg Min. 1st Goal Conceded

Average minute of the first goal conceded — later is better (defense holds longer).

22'

Late-Game Strength

Late-Game Strengthafter the 75th minute
events 16/1615/151615
31%5/16
Scored after 75'26%

Share of matches with a late goal scored by the team — late finishers signal.

20%3/15
44%7/16
Conceded after 75'

Share of matches the team conceded a late goal — late-game vulnerability (lower is better).

27%4/15
67%6/9
Lead Saved after 75'78%

Of matches leading at 75', share closed out for a win — closing strength.

89%8/9
33%3/9
Lead Lost after 75'

Of matches leading at 75', share dropped to a draw or loss — late-game collapse risk.

11%1/9
25%4/16
Any Goal in Stoppage Time

Share of matches with any goal in stoppage time (90+) — late-drama frequency.

7%1/15

Set Pieces

Set Piecespenalty / own-goal share
events 16/1615/151615
92%22/24
Open-Play Share94%

Of the team's scored goals, share from open play — non-set-piece scoring quality.

96%23/24
8%2/24
Penalty Share

Of the team's scored goals, share from penalty kicks — penalty dependency.

4%1/24
0%0/24
Opp Own-Goal Bonus

Of the team's scored goals, share that were opponent own-goals — pressure / fortune.

0%0/24
0%0/20
Penalty Conceded Share

Of conceded goals, share from opponent penalties — defensive discipline (lower is better).

18%4/22
0%0/20
Own-Goal Cost

Of conceded goals, share that were the team's own goals — pressure-induced errors (lower is better).

0%0/22

Corners

Cornersset-piece pressure
1615
7.25
Avg Corners For

Average corners won per match — attacking territorial pressure (> 5.5 is heavy).

4.07
5.19
Avg Corners Against

Average corners conceded per match — territorial pressure faced (lower is better).

6.73
58%
Corner Share48%

Share of total corners in the team's matches that went to the team — territorial dominance ratio.

38%
0.59
EWMACorners Diff

Smoothed corner differential per match — long-term territorial advantage (±2 is strong).

-1.72
81%13/16
Match Corners > 8.581%

Share of matches with total corners > 8.5 (Over 8.5 line) — high-tempo encounter signal.

80%12/15
69%11/16
Match Corners > 9.568%

Share of matches with total corners > 9.5 (Over 9.5 line).

67%10/15
63%10/16
Match Corners > 10.558%

Share of matches with total corners > 10.5 (Over 10.5 line) — corner-heavy clashes only.

53%8/15

Cards & Discipline

Cards & Disciplineyellows, reds & fouls
events 16/1615/151615
1.94
Avg Yellow Cards

Yellow cards picked up per match — discipline signal (lower is better).

1.60
0%0/16
Red Card Match Rate

Share of matches with at least one red card to the team — sending-off risk.

7%1/15
11.88
Avg Fouls

Fouls committed per match — aggression / tactical-foul tendency (lower is calmer).

13.40
77%10/13
Match Cards > 3.572%

Share of matches with total card points (both teams, yellow=1 / red=2, 2Y→R counted as 2) > 3.5 — Over 3.5 line.

67%8/12
13/1612/15
46%6/13
Match Cards > 4.552%

Share of matches with total card points > 4.5 — Over 4.5 line.

58%7/12
13/1612/15
79%
Cards in 2nd Half

Share of card events that occur after halftime — late-discipline tendency.

70%

Venue Edge

Venue EdgeBarnsley at home · Reading on the road
88
1.25
PPG at Venue

Points per match at the venue — home team at home, away team away.

1.00
25%2/8
Win Rate25%

Share of sampled matches won.

25%2/8
25%2/8
Loss Rate

Share of sampled matches lost (lower is better).

50%4/8
1.50
Avg Goals Scored

Goals scored per match across the sampled games.

1.25
1.38
Avg Goals Conceded

Goals conceded per match (lower is better).

2.25
13%1/8
Clean Sheet6%

Share of matches with no goals conceded.

0%0/8
75%6/8
BTTS81%

Share of matches where both teams scored.

88%7/8
63%5/8
Over 2.569%

Share of venue matches with total goals > 2.5.

75%6/8
1.59
EWMAAttack xG (EWMA)

Smoothed xG created at venue — long-term attacking strength in this fixture's venue context.

1.61
1.90
EWMADefense xG (EWMA)

Smoothed xG conceded at venue — defensive strength in this fixture's venue context (lower is better).

2.39