Championship·
Regular Season - 24·12/29/2024·07:30
Norwich
Norwich
WLLDL
1-1
Finished
HT0-1
QPR
QPR
LWDWW
📍 Carrow Road, Norwich, Norfolk
Season statsChampionship
Norwich23matchesQPR23matches

Every panel below reflects each team's matches in Championship.

Coverage varies by leaguetop-tier competitions have richer per-match data; lower divisions and smaller leagues track fewer metrics, so some panels may be sparse or missing entirely.
Pre-match snapshotevery value reflects each team's state going into kick-off — frozen before the match starts, not updated live.

Overall

Overallteam-strength snapshot
46%
Overall

Composite team strength — average of LTQ and Hype.

56%
1526
ELO

Chess-style strength rating going into kick-off.

1475
49%
LTQ

Long-term quality across all competitions.

51%
42%
Hype

Short-term fixture buzz / excitement signal.

60%
3.11
Momentum

Recent goal-scoring trend (weighted goals signal).

2.42

Match Outcome

Match Outcomeresults breakdown
2323
1.26
Points per Game

Average points per match across the sampled games (max 3).

1.09
30%
Win Rate

Share of sampled matches won.

22%
35%
Draw Rate

Share of sampled matches that ended level.

43%
35%
Loss Rate

Share of sampled matches lost (lower is better).

35%
13%
Clean Sheet20%

Share of matches with no goals conceded.

26%
26%
Failed to Score

Share of matches where the team didn't score (lower is better).

30%

Goal Scoring

Goal Scoringattacking output
2323
1.70
Avg Goals Scored

Goals scored per match across the sampled games.

1.00
74%
Scored > 0.572%

Share of matches where the team scored at least once.

70%
87%
Over 1.587%

Share of matches with total goals > 1.5.

87%
61%
Over 2.550%

Share of matches with total goals > 2.5.

39%
39%
Over 3.528%

Share of matches with total goals > 3.5 — high-scoring affairs.

17%
65%
BTTS61%

Share of matches where both teams scored.

57%
22%
BTTS & Win

Share of matches won while both teams scored — strong attack with a defensive lapse.

9%
30%
Scored Both Halves20%

Share of matches with a goal in both the 1st and 2nd half.

9%

Defensive Solidity

Defensive Soliditygoals & shots conceded
2323
1.52
Avg Goals Conceded

Goals conceded per match (lower is better).

1.35
11.96
Avg Shots Conceded

Total shots faced per match — defensive pressure (> 17.5/match is heavy siege).

12.22
4.04
Avg SoT Conceded

Shots on target faced per match — quality of chances given up (> 5.5 is severe).

4.48
2.52
Avg Saves

Goalkeeper saves per match (> 4.5 means the keeper is doing heavy lifting).

3.17
62%
Save %67%

Share of opponent shots on target stopped by the keeper.

71%
13%
Clean Sheet20%

Share of matches with no goals conceded.

26%

xG Trends

xG TrendsEWMA-smoothed performance
2323
1.30
EWMAxG For

Smoothed expected goals created per match — top attacks hit > 2.5/match, mid-table sits around 1.4.

0.97
1.15
EWMAxG Against

Smoothed expected goals conceded per match — elite defenses < 1.0, struggling sides > 2.0.

1.14
0.15
EWMAxG Diff

Net xG: attack minus defense. ±1 is dominant/poor; ±2 is title-contender or crisis-level.

-0.17
0.34
EWMAFinishing Edge

Goals scored minus xG. +0.3 is clinical, −0.3 is wasteful; ±1 is statistical outlier.

0.11
0.12
EWMAxG per Shot

Average chance quality per attempt — 0.10 is mid, 0.15+ means the team only shoots from dangerous spots.

0.09

Shots Quality

Shots Qualityvolume & accuracy
2323
10.91
Avg Shots

Total shots per match — pure attacking volume (> 16.5/match is elite).

12.22
4.35
Avg Shots on Target

Shots on target per match — strikes the keeper had to handle (> 5.5/match is heavy).

3.83
7.43
Avg Shots in Box

Shots taken from inside the penalty area — proximity to goal (> 8.5/match means consistent box presence).

8.39
68%
Box Shot %68%

Share of shots taken from inside the box — chance-selection quality. Mid sits ~60%, elite > 75%.

69%
40%
On-Target %36%

Share of shots that hit the target — striking accuracy. Mid ~33%, elite > 40%.

31%
16%
Shot Conversion12%

Goals per shot taken — clinical efficiency. ~10% is league average, > 15% is elite finishing.

8%

Possession & Passing

Possession & Passingball control
2323
58%
Avg Possession

Share of match time with the ball. > 55% is dominant, < 40% is reactive.

44%
85%
Pass Accuracy

Share of passes completed — distribution quality. Mid sits ~80%, elite > 88%.

77%
532.43
Avg Passes

Total passes attempted per match — distribution volume. Top sides > 550, bottom sides < 400.

367.87
0.17
EWMAPossession Trend

Smoothed possession differential — team minus opponent. ±0.1 is normal, ±0.2 is strong dominance.

-0.16

HT / FT Patterns

HT / FT Patternshalf-time vs full-time outcomes
2323
39%9/23
Leading at HT24%

Share of matches the team led at halftime — fast-start signal.

9%2/23
26%6/23
Level at HT

Share of matches level at halftime — balanced or low-tempo openings.

52%12/23
35%8/23
Trailing at HT

Share of matches the team trailed at halftime — slow starts (lower is better).

39%9/23
65%15/23
HT/FT Same Outcome61%

Share of matches where the W/D/L state at halftime matched the full-time result — game-state stability.

57%13/23
67%6/9
Led at HT → Won83%

Of matches led at HT, share converted into a full-time win — closing strength.

100%2/2
38%3/8
Trailed at HT → Recovered47%

Of matches trailing at HT, share rescued to a draw or win — comeback resilience.

56%5/9

Goal Timing

Goal Timingwhen goals happen
events 23/2323/232323
18%
0-15'14%

Hot starts — share of the team's goals scored in the opening 15 minutes.

9%
18%
16-30'16%

Early control — share scored between the 16th and 30th minute.

14%
16%
31-45'17%

Pre-HT push — share scored in the run-up to halftime.

18%
11%
46-60'17%

Restart wave — share scored in the first 15 minutes after HT.

23%
18%
61-75'18%

Game-state shift — share scored between minutes 61 and 75.

18%
18%
76-90+'18%

Late-game finishers — share scored from the 76th minute onwards (incl. stoppage time).

18%

First-Goal Edge

First-Goal Edgewho strikes first
events 23/2323/232323
64%14/22
Scored First49%

Share of matches where the team opened the scoring — fast-start signal.

35%7/20
36%8/22
Conceded First

Share of matches where the team conceded the opening goal (lower is better).

65%13/20
43%6/14
Win when Scoring First50%

Of matches the team scored first, share converted into a win — closing strength after the opener.

57%4/7
13%1/8
Win when Conceding First10%

Of matches conceding first, share rescued into a win — comeback strength.

8%1/13
21'
Avg Min. 1st Goal Scored

Average minute of the team's first goal — earlier means faster starters.

23'
17'
Avg Min. 1st Goal Conceded

Average minute of the first goal conceded — later is better (defense holds longer).

34'

Late-Game Strength

Late-Game Strengthafter the 75th minute
events 23/2323/232323
22%5/23
Scored after 75'20%

Share of matches with a late goal scored by the team — late finishers signal.

17%4/23
22%5/23
Conceded after 75'

Share of matches the team conceded a late goal — late-game vulnerability (lower is better).

13%3/23
67%6/9
Lead Saved after 75'83%

Of matches leading at 75', share closed out for a win — closing strength.

100%4/4
33%3/9
Lead Lost after 75'

Of matches leading at 75', share dropped to a draw or loss — late-game collapse risk.

0%0/4
9%2/23
Any Goal in Stoppage Time

Share of matches with any goal in stoppage time (90+) — late-drama frequency.

17%4/23

Set Pieces

Set Piecespenalty / own-goal share
events 23/2323/232323
95%36/38
Open-Play Share93%

Of the team's scored goals, share from open play — non-set-piece scoring quality.

91%20/22
3%1/38
Penalty Share

Of the team's scored goals, share from penalty kicks — penalty dependency.

5%1/22
3%1/38
Opp Own-Goal Bonus

Of the team's scored goals, share that were opponent own-goals — pressure / fortune.

5%1/22
3%1/36
Penalty Conceded Share

Of conceded goals, share from opponent penalties — defensive discipline (lower is better).

3%1/32
6%2/36
Own-Goal Cost

Of conceded goals, share that were the team's own goals — pressure-induced errors (lower is better).

6%2/32

Corners

Cornersset-piece pressure
2323
4.57
Avg Corners For

Average corners won per match — attacking territorial pressure (> 5.5 is heavy).

5.22
5.04
Avg Corners Against

Average corners conceded per match — territorial pressure faced (lower is better).

6.39
48%
Corner Share46%

Share of total corners in the team's matches that went to the team — territorial dominance ratio.

45%
-0.22
EWMACorners Diff

Smoothed corner differential per match — long-term territorial advantage (±2 is strong).

-1.73
61%14/23
Match Corners > 8.570%

Share of matches with total corners > 8.5 (Over 8.5 line) — high-tempo encounter signal.

78%18/23
52%12/23
Match Corners > 9.563%

Share of matches with total corners > 9.5 (Over 9.5 line).

74%17/23
43%10/23
Match Corners > 10.554%

Share of matches with total corners > 10.5 (Over 10.5 line) — corner-heavy clashes only.

65%15/23

Cards & Discipline

Cards & Disciplineyellows, reds & fouls
events 23/2323/232323
2.39
Avg Yellow Cards

Yellow cards picked up per match — discipline signal (lower is better).

1.96
9%2/23
Red Card Match Rate

Share of matches with at least one red card to the team — sending-off risk.

9%2/23
12.48
Avg Fouls

Fouls committed per match — aggression / tactical-foul tendency (lower is calmer).

9.57
70%14/20
Match Cards > 3.572%

Share of matches with total card points (both teams, yellow=1 / red=2, 2Y→R counted as 2) > 3.5 — Over 3.5 line.

74%14/19
20/2319/23
60%12/20
Match Cards > 4.551%

Share of matches with total card points > 4.5 — Over 4.5 line.

42%8/19
20/2319/23
63%
Cards in 2nd Half

Share of card events that occur after halftime — late-discipline tendency.

63%

Venue Edge

Venue EdgeNorwich at home · QPR on the road
1111
1.73
PPG at Venue

Points per match at the venue — home team at home, away team away.

1.00
45%5/11
Win Rate32%

Share of sampled matches won.

18%2/11
18%2/11
Loss Rate

Share of sampled matches lost (lower is better).

36%4/11
2.55
Avg Goals Scored

Goals scored per match across the sampled games.

0.73
1.45
Avg Goals Conceded

Goals conceded per match (lower is better).

1.27
9%1/11
Clean Sheet18%

Share of matches with no goals conceded.

27%3/11
82%9/11
BTTS59%

Share of matches where both teams scored.

36%4/11
73%8/11
Over 2.550%

Share of venue matches with total goals > 2.5.

27%3/11
1.85
EWMAAttack xG (EWMA)

Smoothed xG created at venue — long-term attacking strength in this fixture's venue context.

0.76
1.17
EWMADefense xG (EWMA)

Smoothed xG conceded at venue — defensive strength in this fixture's venue context (lower is better).

1.36