Ligue 1·
Regular Season - 22·02/16/2025·11:15
Reims
Reims
LDLDD
0-1
Finished
HT0-1
Angers
Angers
LWDLW
📍 Stade Auguste-Delaune, Reims
Season statsLigue 1
Reims21matchesAngers21matches

Every panel below reflects each team's matches in Ligue 1.

Coverage varies by leaguetop-tier competitions have richer per-match data; lower divisions and smaller leagues track fewer metrics, so some panels may be sparse or missing entirely.
Pre-match snapshotevery value reflects each team's state going into kick-off — frozen before the match starts, not updated live.

Overall

Overallteam-strength snapshot
42%
Overall

Composite team strength — average of LTQ and Hype.

54%
1469
ELO

Chess-style strength rating going into kick-off.

1570
45%
LTQ

Long-term quality across all competitions.

59%
38%
Hype

Short-term fixture buzz / excitement signal.

48%
2.41
Momentum

Recent goal-scoring trend (weighted goals signal).

2.54

Match Outcome

Match Outcomeresults breakdown
2121
1.05
Points per Game

Average points per match across the sampled games (max 3).

1.10
24%
Win Rate

Share of sampled matches won.

29%
33%
Draw Rate

Share of sampled matches that ended level.

24%
43%
Loss Rate

Share of sampled matches lost (lower is better).

48%
14%
Clean Sheet17%

Share of matches with no goals conceded.

19%
29%
Failed to Score

Share of matches where the team didn't score (lower is better).

33%

Goal Scoring

Goal Scoringattacking output
2121
1.24
Avg Goals Scored

Goals scored per match across the sampled games.

1.05
71%
Scored > 0.569%

Share of matches where the team scored at least once.

67%
86%
Over 1.581%

Share of matches with total goals > 1.5.

76%
57%
Over 2.543%

Share of matches with total goals > 2.5.

29%
29%
Over 3.526%

Share of matches with total goals > 3.5 — high-scoring affairs.

24%
67%
BTTS57%

Share of matches where both teams scored.

48%
19%
BTTS & Win

Share of matches won while both teams scored — strong attack with a defensive lapse.

10%
29%
Scored Both Halves24%

Share of matches with a goal in both the 1st and 2nd half.

19%

Defensive Solidity

Defensive Soliditygoals & shots conceded
2121
1.57
Avg Goals Conceded

Goals conceded per match (lower is better).

1.48
13.33
Avg Shots Conceded

Total shots faced per match — defensive pressure (> 17.5/match is heavy siege).

13.33
5.48
Avg SoT Conceded

Shots on target faced per match — quality of chances given up (> 5.5 is severe).

5.71
3.90
Avg Saves

Goalkeeper saves per match (> 4.5 means the keeper is doing heavy lifting).

4.05
71%
Save %71%

Share of opponent shots on target stopped by the keeper.

71%
14%
Clean Sheet17%

Share of matches with no goals conceded.

19%

xG Trends

xG TrendsEWMA-smoothed performance
2121
1.08
EWMAxG For

Smoothed expected goals created per match — top attacks hit > 2.5/match, mid-table sits around 1.4.

1.57
1.59
EWMAxG Against

Smoothed expected goals conceded per match — elite defenses < 1.0, struggling sides > 2.0.

1.51
-0.51
EWMAxG Diff

Net xG: attack minus defense. ±1 is dominant/poor; ±2 is title-contender or crisis-level.

0.06
-0.02
EWMAFinishing Edge

Goals scored minus xG. +0.3 is clinical, −0.3 is wasteful; ±1 is statistical outlier.

-0.25
0.09
EWMAxG per Shot

Average chance quality per attempt — 0.10 is mid, 0.15+ means the team only shoots from dangerous spots.

0.16

Shots Quality

Shots Qualityvolume & accuracy
2121
11.95
Avg Shots

Total shots per match — pure attacking volume (> 16.5/match is elite).

9.95
3.38
Avg Shots on Target

Shots on target per match — strikes the keeper had to handle (> 5.5/match is heavy).

3.14
7.62
Avg Shots in Box

Shots taken from inside the penalty area — proximity to goal (> 8.5/match means consistent box presence).

6.10
64%
Box Shot %62%

Share of shots taken from inside the box — chance-selection quality. Mid sits ~60%, elite > 75%.

61%
28%
On-Target %30%

Share of shots that hit the target — striking accuracy. Mid ~33%, elite > 40%.

32%
10%
Shot Conversion10%

Goals per shot taken — clinical efficiency. ~10% is league average, > 15% is elite finishing.

11%

Possession & Passing

Possession & Passingball control
2121
45%
Avg Possession

Share of match time with the ball. > 55% is dominant, < 40% is reactive.

42%
81%
Pass Accuracy

Share of passes completed — distribution quality. Mid sits ~80%, elite > 88%.

81%
395.90
Avg Passes

Total passes attempted per match — distribution volume. Top sides > 550, bottom sides < 400.

381.00
-0.08
EWMAPossession Trend

Smoothed possession differential — team minus opponent. ±0.1 is normal, ±0.2 is strong dominance.

-0.16

HT / FT Patterns

HT / FT Patternshalf-time vs full-time outcomes
2121
29%6/21
Leading at HT29%

Share of matches the team led at halftime — fast-start signal.

29%6/21
33%7/21
Level at HT

Share of matches level at halftime — balanced or low-tempo openings.

33%7/21
38%8/21
Trailing at HT

Share of matches the team trailed at halftime — slow starts (lower is better).

38%8/21
57%12/21
HT/FT Same Outcome64%

Share of matches where the W/D/L state at halftime matched the full-time result — game-state stability.

71%15/21
50%3/6
Led at HT → Won67%

Of matches led at HT, share converted into a full-time win — closing strength.

83%5/6
25%2/8
Trailed at HT → Recovered19%

Of matches trailing at HT, share rescued to a draw or win — comeback resilience.

13%1/8

Goal Timing

Goal Timingwhen goals happen
events 21/2121/212121
16%
0-15'15%

Hot starts — share of the team's goals scored in the opening 15 minutes.

14%
20%
16-30'17%

Early control — share scored between the 16th and 30th minute.

14%
16%
31-45'10%

Pre-HT push — share scored in the run-up to halftime.

5%
28%
46-60'19%

Restart wave — share scored in the first 15 minutes after HT.

10%
4%
61-75'14%

Game-state shift — share scored between minutes 61 and 75.

24%
16%
76-90+'25%

Late-game finishers — share scored from the 76th minute onwards (incl. stoppage time).

33%

First-Goal Edge

First-Goal Edgewho strikes first
events 21/2121/212121
32%6/19
Scored First30%

Share of matches where the team opened the scoring — fast-start signal.

29%6/21
68%13/19
Conceded First

Share of matches where the team conceded the opening goal (lower is better).

71%15/21
50%3/6
Win when Scoring First67%

Of matches the team scored first, share converted into a win — closing strength after the opener.

83%5/6
15%2/13
Win when Conceding First11%

Of matches conceding first, share rescued into a win — comeback strength.

7%1/15
18'
Avg Min. 1st Goal Scored

Average minute of the team's first goal — earlier means faster starters.

23'
35'
Avg Min. 1st Goal Conceded

Average minute of the first goal conceded — later is better (defense holds longer).

37'

Late-Game Strength

Late-Game Strengthafter the 75th minute
events 21/2121/212121
19%4/21
Scored after 75'24%

Share of matches with a late goal scored by the team — late finishers signal.

29%6/21
33%7/21
Conceded after 75'

Share of matches the team conceded a late goal — late-game vulnerability (lower is better).

29%6/21
100%4/4
Lead Saved after 75'100%

Of matches leading at 75', share closed out for a win — closing strength.

100%5/5
0%0/4
Lead Lost after 75'

Of matches leading at 75', share dropped to a draw or loss — late-game collapse risk.

0%0/5
24%5/21
Any Goal in Stoppage Time

Share of matches with any goal in stoppage time (90+) — late-drama frequency.

33%7/21

Set Pieces

Set Piecespenalty / own-goal share
events 21/2121/212121
96%24/25
Open-Play Share91%

Of the team's scored goals, share from open play — non-set-piece scoring quality.

86%18/21
4%1/25
Penalty Share

Of the team's scored goals, share from penalty kicks — penalty dependency.

14%3/21
0%0/25
Opp Own-Goal Bonus

Of the team's scored goals, share that were opponent own-goals — pressure / fortune.

0%0/21
6%2/34
Penalty Conceded Share

Of conceded goals, share from opponent penalties — defensive discipline (lower is better).

6%2/32
3%1/34
Own-Goal Cost

Of conceded goals, share that were the team's own goals — pressure-induced errors (lower is better).

3%1/32

Corners

Cornersset-piece pressure
2121
4.67
Avg Corners For

Average corners won per match — attacking territorial pressure (> 5.5 is heavy).

3.52
4.71
Avg Corners Against

Average corners conceded per match — territorial pressure faced (lower is better).

4.57
50%
Corner Share47%

Share of total corners in the team's matches that went to the team — territorial dominance ratio.

44%
0.41
EWMACorners Diff

Smoothed corner differential per match — long-term territorial advantage (±2 is strong).

-1.59
57%12/21
Match Corners > 8.550%

Share of matches with total corners > 8.5 (Over 8.5 line) — high-tempo encounter signal.

43%9/21
38%8/21
Match Corners > 9.533%

Share of matches with total corners > 9.5 (Over 9.5 line).

29%6/21
33%7/21
Match Corners > 10.526%

Share of matches with total corners > 10.5 (Over 10.5 line) — corner-heavy clashes only.

19%4/21

Cards & Discipline

Cards & Disciplineyellows, reds & fouls
events 21/2121/212121
2.29
Avg Yellow Cards

Yellow cards picked up per match — discipline signal (lower is better).

1.38
14%3/21
Red Card Match Rate

Share of matches with at least one red card to the team — sending-off risk.

10%2/21
12.10
Avg Fouls

Fouls committed per match — aggression / tactical-foul tendency (lower is calmer).

11.00
67%12/18
Match Cards > 3.563%

Share of matches with total card points (both teams, yellow=1 / red=2, 2Y→R counted as 2) > 3.5 — Over 3.5 line.

59%10/17
18/2117/21
39%7/18
Match Cards > 4.543%

Share of matches with total card points > 4.5 — Over 4.5 line.

47%8/17
18/2117/21
67%
Cards in 2nd Half

Share of card events that occur after halftime — late-discipline tendency.

51%

Venue Edge

Venue EdgeReims at home · Angers on the road
1110
0.91
PPG at Venue

Points per match at the venue — home team at home, away team away.

1.20
18%2/11
Win Rate24%

Share of sampled matches won.

30%3/10
45%5/11
Loss Rate

Share of sampled matches lost (lower is better).

40%4/10
1.18
Avg Goals Scored

Goals scored per match across the sampled games.

0.80
1.64
Avg Goals Conceded

Goals conceded per match (lower is better).

1.00
9%1/11
Clean Sheet15%

Share of matches with no goals conceded.

20%2/10
73%8/11
BTTS56%

Share of matches where both teams scored.

40%4/10
45%5/11
Over 2.528%

Share of venue matches with total goals > 2.5.

10%1/10
1.09
EWMAAttack xG (EWMA)

Smoothed xG created at venue — long-term attacking strength in this fixture's venue context.

1.77
1.51
EWMADefense xG (EWMA)

Smoothed xG conceded at venue — defensive strength in this fixture's venue context (lower is better).

1.28