Jupiler Pro League·
Regular Season - 24·02/01/2025·10:00
Charleroi
Charleroi
DDLWW
5-0
Finished
HT3-0
Dender
Dender
LLDWL
📍 Stade du Pays de Charleroi, Charleroi
Season statsJupiler Pro League
Charleroi23matchesDender23matches

Every panel below reflects each team's matches in Jupiler Pro League.

Coverage varies by leaguetop-tier competitions have richer per-match data; lower divisions and smaller leagues track fewer metrics, so some panels may be sparse or missing entirely.
Pre-match snapshotevery value reflects each team's state going into kick-off — frozen before the match starts, not updated live.

Overall

Overallteam-strength snapshot
50%
Overall

Composite team strength — average of LTQ and Hype.

41%
1566
ELO

Chess-style strength rating going into kick-off.

1538
51%
LTQ

Long-term quality across all competitions.

46%
49%
Hype

Short-term fixture buzz / excitement signal.

35%
2.13
Momentum

Recent goal-scoring trend (weighted goals signal).

2.01

Match Outcome

Match Outcomeresults breakdown
2323
1.26
Points per Game

Average points per match across the sampled games (max 3).

1.22
35%
Win Rate

Share of sampled matches won.

30%
22%
Draw Rate

Share of sampled matches that ended level.

30%
43%
Loss Rate

Share of sampled matches lost (lower is better).

39%
26%
Clean Sheet26%

Share of matches with no goals conceded.

26%
35%
Failed to Score

Share of matches where the team didn't score (lower is better).

35%

Goal Scoring

Goal Scoringattacking output
2323
1.04
Avg Goals Scored

Goals scored per match across the sampled games.

1.17
65%
Scored > 0.565%

Share of matches where the team scored at least once.

65%
61%
Over 1.565%

Share of matches with total goals > 1.5.

70%
35%
Over 2.541%

Share of matches with total goals > 2.5.

48%
13%
Over 3.522%

Share of matches with total goals > 3.5 — high-scoring affairs.

30%
43%
BTTS48%

Share of matches where both teams scored.

52%
13%
BTTS & Win

Share of matches won while both teams scored — strong attack with a defensive lapse.

17%
13%
Scored Both Halves15%

Share of matches with a goal in both the 1st and 2nd half.

17%

Defensive Solidity

Defensive Soliditygoals & shots conceded
2323
1.17
Avg Goals Conceded

Goals conceded per match (lower is better).

1.52
12.10
Avg Shots Conceded

Total shots faced per match — defensive pressure (> 17.5/match is heavy siege).

14.59
21/2322/23
4.33
Avg SoT Conceded

Shots on target faced per match — quality of chances given up (> 5.5 is severe).

4.86
21/2322/23
3.14
Avg Saves

Goalkeeper saves per match (> 4.5 means the keeper is doing heavy lifting).

3.50
21/2322/23
73%
Save %72%

Share of opponent shots on target stopped by the keeper.

72%
21/2322/23
26%
Clean Sheet26%

Share of matches with no goals conceded.

26%

xG Trends

xG TrendsEWMA-smoothed performance
2323
1.31
EWMAxG For

Smoothed expected goals created per match — top attacks hit > 2.5/match, mid-table sits around 1.4.

1.18
1.34
EWMAxG Against

Smoothed expected goals conceded per match — elite defenses < 1.0, struggling sides > 2.0.

1.57
-0.03
EWMAxG Diff

Net xG: attack minus defense. ±1 is dominant/poor; ±2 is title-contender or crisis-level.

-0.39
-0.30
EWMAFinishing Edge

Goals scored minus xG. +0.3 is clinical, −0.3 is wasteful; ±1 is statistical outlier.

-0.04
0.10
EWMAxG per Shot

Average chance quality per attempt — 0.10 is mid, 0.15+ means the team only shoots from dangerous spots.

0.11

Shots Quality

Shots Qualityvolume & accuracy
2323
14.67
Avg Shots

Total shots per match — pure attacking volume (> 16.5/match is elite).

10.18
21/2322/23
4.95
Avg Shots on Target

Shots on target per match — strikes the keeper had to handle (> 5.5/match is heavy).

3.00
21/2322/23
9.24
Avg Shots in Box

Shots taken from inside the penalty area — proximity to goal (> 8.5/match means consistent box presence).

6.77
21/2322/23
63%
Box Shot %65%

Share of shots taken from inside the box — chance-selection quality. Mid sits ~60%, elite > 75%.

67%
21/2322/23
34%
On-Target %32%

Share of shots that hit the target — striking accuracy. Mid ~33%, elite > 40%.

29%
21/2322/23
7%
Shot Conversion9%

Goals per shot taken — clinical efficiency. ~10% is league average, > 15% is elite finishing.

11%
21/2322/23

Possession & Passing

Possession & Passingball control
2323
53%
Avg Possession

Share of match time with the ball. > 55% is dominant, < 40% is reactive.

43%
21/2322/23
80%
Pass Accuracy

Share of passes completed — distribution quality. Mid sits ~80%, elite > 88%.

75%
21/2322/23
456.33
Avg Passes

Total passes attempted per match — distribution volume. Top sides > 550, bottom sides < 400.

395.86
21/2322/23
0.04
EWMAPossession Trend

Smoothed possession differential — team minus opponent. ±0.1 is normal, ±0.2 is strong dominance.

-0.10

HT / FT Patterns

HT / FT Patternshalf-time vs full-time outcomes
2323
35%8/23
Leading at HT33%

Share of matches the team led at halftime — fast-start signal.

30%7/23
39%9/23
Level at HT

Share of matches level at halftime — balanced or low-tempo openings.

22%5/23
26%6/23
Trailing at HT

Share of matches the team trailed at halftime — slow starts (lower is better).

48%11/23
61%14/23
HT/FT Same Outcome70%

Share of matches where the W/D/L state at halftime matched the full-time result — game-state stability.

78%18/23
75%6/8
Led at HT → Won80%

Of matches led at HT, share converted into a full-time win — closing strength.

86%6/7
17%1/6
Trailed at HT → Recovered22%

Of matches trailing at HT, share rescued to a draw or win — comeback resilience.

27%3/11

Goal Timing

Goal Timingwhen goals happen
events 23/2323/232323
28%
0-15'27%

Hot starts — share of the team's goals scored in the opening 15 minutes.

26%
12%
16-30'13%

Early control — share scored between the 16th and 30th minute.

15%
20%
31-45'19%

Pre-HT push — share scored in the run-up to halftime.

19%
24%
46-60'18%

Restart wave — share scored in the first 15 minutes after HT.

11%
4%
61-75'6%

Game-state shift — share scored between minutes 61 and 75.

7%
12%
76-90+'17%

Late-game finishers — share scored from the 76th minute onwards (incl. stoppage time).

22%

First-Goal Edge

First-Goal Edgewho strikes first
events 23/2323/232323
59%13/22
Scored First55%

Share of matches where the team opened the scoring — fast-start signal.

50%10/20
41%9/22
Conceded First

Share of matches where the team conceded the opening goal (lower is better).

50%10/20
62%8/13
Win when Scoring First61%

Of matches the team scored first, share converted into a win — closing strength after the opener.

60%6/10
0%0/9
Win when Conceding First5%

Of matches conceding first, share rescued into a win — comeback strength.

10%1/10
26'
Avg Min. 1st Goal Scored

Average minute of the team's first goal — earlier means faster starters.

15'
47'
Avg Min. 1st Goal Conceded

Average minute of the first goal conceded — later is better (defense holds longer).

22'

Late-Game Strength

Late-Game Strengthafter the 75th minute
events 23/2323/232323
13%3/23
Scored after 75'17%

Share of matches with a late goal scored by the team — late finishers signal.

22%5/23
26%6/23
Conceded after 75'

Share of matches the team conceded a late goal — late-game vulnerability (lower is better).

17%4/23
78%7/9
Lead Saved after 75'72%

Of matches leading at 75', share closed out for a win — closing strength.

67%4/6
22%2/9
Lead Lost after 75'

Of matches leading at 75', share dropped to a draw or loss — late-game collapse risk.

33%2/6
22%5/23
Any Goal in Stoppage Time

Share of matches with any goal in stoppage time (90+) — late-drama frequency.

13%3/23

Set Pieces

Set Piecespenalty / own-goal share
events 23/2323/232323
88%22/25
Open-Play Share88%

Of the team's scored goals, share from open play — non-set-piece scoring quality.

89%24/27
8%2/25
Penalty Share

Of the team's scored goals, share from penalty kicks — penalty dependency.

4%1/27
4%1/25
Opp Own-Goal Bonus

Of the team's scored goals, share that were opponent own-goals — pressure / fortune.

7%2/27
12%3/26
Penalty Conceded Share

Of conceded goals, share from opponent penalties — defensive discipline (lower is better).

11%4/35
0%0/26
Own-Goal Cost

Of conceded goals, share that were the team's own goals — pressure-induced errors (lower is better).

6%2/35

Corners

Cornersset-piece pressure
2323
5.14
Avg Corners For

Average corners won per match — attacking territorial pressure (> 5.5 is heavy).

4.23
21/2322/23
4.48
Avg Corners Against

Average corners conceded per match — territorial pressure faced (lower is better).

4.68
21/2322/23
53%
Corner Share50%

Share of total corners in the team's matches that went to the team — territorial dominance ratio.

47%
21/2322/23
0.34
EWMACorners Diff

Smoothed corner differential per match — long-term territorial advantage (±2 is strong).

0.13
62%13/21
Match Corners > 8.556%

Share of matches with total corners > 8.5 (Over 8.5 line) — high-tempo encounter signal.

50%11/22
21/2322/23
38%8/21
Match Corners > 9.537%

Share of matches with total corners > 9.5 (Over 9.5 line).

36%8/22
21/2322/23
29%6/21
Match Corners > 10.528%

Share of matches with total corners > 10.5 (Over 10.5 line) — corner-heavy clashes only.

27%6/22
21/2322/23

Cards & Discipline

Cards & Disciplineyellows, reds & fouls
events 23/2323/232323
2.43
Avg Yellow Cards

Yellow cards picked up per match — discipline signal (lower is better).

2.23
21/2322/23
10%2/21
Red Card Match Rate

Share of matches with at least one red card to the team — sending-off risk.

9%2/22
21/2322/23
10.76
Avg Fouls

Fouls committed per match — aggression / tactical-foul tendency (lower is calmer).

10.86
21/2322/23
62%13/21
Match Cards > 3.570%

Share of matches with total card points (both teams, yellow=1 / red=2, 2Y→R counted as 2) > 3.5 — Over 3.5 line.

78%14/18
21/2318/23
38%8/21
Match Cards > 4.541%

Share of matches with total card points > 4.5 — Over 4.5 line.

44%8/18
21/2318/23
70%
Cards in 2nd Half

Share of card events that occur after halftime — late-discipline tendency.

72%

Venue Edge

Venue EdgeCharleroi at home · Dender on the road
1111
1.64
PPG at Venue

Points per match at the venue — home team at home, away team away.

1.36
45%5/11
Win Rate41%

Share of sampled matches won.

36%4/11
27%3/11
Loss Rate

Share of sampled matches lost (lower is better).

36%4/11
1.09
Avg Goals Scored

Goals scored per match across the sampled games.

1.36
0.82
Avg Goals Conceded

Goals conceded per match (lower is better).

1.73
36%4/11
Clean Sheet27%

Share of matches with no goals conceded.

18%2/11
45%5/11
BTTS50%

Share of matches where both teams scored.

55%6/11
27%3/11
Over 2.545%

Share of venue matches with total goals > 2.5.

64%7/11
1.38
EWMAAttack xG (EWMA)

Smoothed xG created at venue — long-term attacking strength in this fixture's venue context.

1.40
1.02
EWMADefense xG (EWMA)

Smoothed xG conceded at venue — defensive strength in this fixture's venue context (lower is better).

1.56