Jupiler Pro League·
Regular Season - 24·02/02/2025·12:30
Gent
Gent
DDDLW
1-0
Finished
HT1-0
Anderlecht
Anderlecht
LWLWW
📍 Planet Group Arena, Gent
Season statsJupiler Pro League
Gent23matchesAnderlecht23matches

Every panel below reflects each team's matches in Jupiler Pro League.

Coverage varies by leaguetop-tier competitions have richer per-match data; lower divisions and smaller leagues track fewer metrics, so some panels may be sparse or missing entirely.
Pre-match snapshotevery value reflects each team's state going into kick-off — frozen before the match starts, not updated live.

Overall

Overallteam-strength snapshot
55%
Overall

Composite team strength — average of LTQ and Hype.

50%
1587
ELO

Chess-style strength rating going into kick-off.

1680
55%
LTQ

Long-term quality across all competitions.

57%
54%
Hype

Short-term fixture buzz / excitement signal.

42%
1.38
Momentum

Recent goal-scoring trend (weighted goals signal).

3.35

Match Outcome

Match Outcomeresults breakdown
2323
1.43
Points per Game

Average points per match across the sampled games (max 3).

1.70
35%
Win Rate

Share of sampled matches won.

48%
39%
Draw Rate

Share of sampled matches that ended level.

26%
26%
Loss Rate

Share of sampled matches lost (lower is better).

26%
43%
Clean Sheet43%

Share of matches with no goals conceded.

43%
30%
Failed to Score

Share of matches where the team didn't score (lower is better).

26%

Goal Scoring

Goal Scoringattacking output
2323
1.35
Avg Goals Scored

Goals scored per match across the sampled games.

1.83
70%
Scored > 0.572%

Share of matches where the team scored at least once.

74%
70%
Over 1.576%

Share of matches with total goals > 1.5.

83%
39%
Over 2.548%

Share of matches with total goals > 2.5.

57%
26%
Over 3.528%

Share of matches with total goals > 3.5 — high-scoring affairs.

30%
43%
BTTS43%

Share of matches where both teams scored.

43%
9%
BTTS & Win

Share of matches won while both teams scored — strong attack with a defensive lapse.

17%
26%
Scored Both Halves35%

Share of matches with a goal in both the 1st and 2nd half.

43%

Defensive Solidity

Defensive Soliditygoals & shots conceded
2323
1.09
Avg Goals Conceded

Goals conceded per match (lower is better).

0.96
15.82
Avg Shots Conceded

Total shots faced per match — defensive pressure (> 17.5/match is heavy siege).

14.52
22/23
5.73
Avg SoT Conceded

Shots on target faced per match — quality of chances given up (> 5.5 is severe).

4.78
22/23
4.59
Avg Saves

Goalkeeper saves per match (> 4.5 means the keeper is doing heavy lifting).

3.83
22/23
80%
Save %80%

Share of opponent shots on target stopped by the keeper.

80%
22/23
43%
Clean Sheet43%

Share of matches with no goals conceded.

43%

xG Trends

xG TrendsEWMA-smoothed performance
2323
1.60
EWMAxG For

Smoothed expected goals created per match — top attacks hit > 2.5/match, mid-table sits around 1.4.

1.54
1.34
EWMAxG Against

Smoothed expected goals conceded per match — elite defenses < 1.0, struggling sides > 2.0.

1.29
0.27
EWMAxG Diff

Net xG: attack minus defense. ±1 is dominant/poor; ±2 is title-contender or crisis-level.

0.25
-0.29
EWMAFinishing Edge

Goals scored minus xG. +0.3 is clinical, −0.3 is wasteful; ±1 is statistical outlier.

0.37
0.12
EWMAxG per Shot

Average chance quality per attempt — 0.10 is mid, 0.15+ means the team only shoots from dangerous spots.

0.12

Shots Quality

Shots Qualityvolume & accuracy
2323
12.32
Avg Shots

Total shots per match — pure attacking volume (> 16.5/match is elite).

13.61
22/23
4.50
Avg Shots on Target

Shots on target per match — strikes the keeper had to handle (> 5.5/match is heavy).

5.17
22/23
7.95
Avg Shots in Box

Shots taken from inside the penalty area — proximity to goal (> 8.5/match means consistent box presence).

8.61
22/23
65%
Box Shot %64%

Share of shots taken from inside the box — chance-selection quality. Mid sits ~60%, elite > 75%.

63%
22/23
37%
On-Target %37%

Share of shots that hit the target — striking accuracy. Mid ~33%, elite > 40%.

38%
22/23
11%
Shot Conversion12%

Goals per shot taken — clinical efficiency. ~10% is league average, > 15% is elite finishing.

13%
22/23

Possession & Passing

Possession & Passingball control
2323
52%
Avg Possession

Share of match time with the ball. > 55% is dominant, < 40% is reactive.

57%
22/23
79%
Pass Accuracy

Share of passes completed — distribution quality. Mid sits ~80%, elite > 88%.

85%
22/23
442.55
Avg Passes

Total passes attempted per match — distribution volume. Top sides > 550, bottom sides < 400.

505.74
22/23
0.07
EWMAPossession Trend

Smoothed possession differential — team minus opponent. ±0.1 is normal, ±0.2 is strong dominance.

0.11

HT / FT Patterns

HT / FT Patternshalf-time vs full-time outcomes
2323
35%8/23
Leading at HT37%

Share of matches the team led at halftime — fast-start signal.

39%9/23
48%11/23
Level at HT

Share of matches level at halftime — balanced or low-tempo openings.

39%9/23
17%4/23
Trailing at HT

Share of matches the team trailed at halftime — slow starts (lower is better).

22%5/23
65%15/23
HT/FT Same Outcome70%

Share of matches where the W/D/L state at halftime matched the full-time result — game-state stability.

74%17/23
75%6/8
Led at HT → Won76%

Of matches led at HT, share converted into a full-time win — closing strength.

78%7/9
25%1/4
Trailed at HT → Recovered13%

Of matches trailing at HT, share rescued to a draw or win — comeback resilience.

0%0/5

Goal Timing

Goal Timingwhen goals happen
events 23/2323/232323
13%
0-15'9%

Hot starts — share of the team's goals scored in the opening 15 minutes.

5%
19%
16-30'20%

Early control — share scored between the 16th and 30th minute.

21%
16%
31-45'19%

Pre-HT push — share scored in the run-up to halftime.

21%
19%
46-60'12%

Restart wave — share scored in the first 15 minutes after HT.

5%
10%
61-75'13%

Game-state shift — share scored between minutes 61 and 75.

16%
23%
76-90+'27%

Late-game finishers — share scored from the 76th minute onwards (incl. stoppage time).

32%

First-Goal Edge

First-Goal Edgewho strikes first
events 23/2323/232323
58%11/19
Scored First56%

Share of matches where the team opened the scoring — fast-start signal.

55%11/20
42%8/19
Conceded First

Share of matches where the team conceded the opening goal (lower is better).

45%9/20
73%8/11
Win when Scoring First73%

Of matches the team scored first, share converted into a win — closing strength after the opener.

73%8/11
0%0/8
Win when Conceding First17%

Of matches conceding first, share rescued into a win — comeback strength.

33%3/9
28'
Avg Min. 1st Goal Scored

Average minute of the team's first goal — earlier means faster starters.

33'
40'
Avg Min. 1st Goal Conceded

Average minute of the first goal conceded — later is better (defense holds longer).

20'

Late-Game Strength

Late-Game Strengthafter the 75th minute
events 23/2323/232323
30%7/23
Scored after 75'39%

Share of matches with a late goal scored by the team — late finishers signal.

48%11/23
22%5/23
Conceded after 75'

Share of matches the team conceded a late goal — late-game vulnerability (lower is better).

26%6/23
86%6/7
Lead Saved after 75'87%

Of matches leading at 75', share closed out for a win — closing strength.

89%8/9
14%1/7
Lead Lost after 75'

Of matches leading at 75', share dropped to a draw or loss — late-game collapse risk.

11%1/9
9%2/23
Any Goal in Stoppage Time

Share of matches with any goal in stoppage time (90+) — late-drama frequency.

17%4/23

Set Pieces

Set Piecespenalty / own-goal share
events 23/2323/232323
94%29/31
Open-Play Share92%

Of the team's scored goals, share from open play — non-set-piece scoring quality.

89%34/38
3%1/31
Penalty Share

Of the team's scored goals, share from penalty kicks — penalty dependency.

11%4/38
3%1/31
Opp Own-Goal Bonus

Of the team's scored goals, share that were opponent own-goals — pressure / fortune.

0%0/38
4%1/25
Penalty Conceded Share

Of conceded goals, share from opponent penalties — defensive discipline (lower is better).

0%0/26
4%1/25
Own-Goal Cost

Of conceded goals, share that were the team's own goals — pressure-induced errors (lower is better).

15%4/26

Corners

Cornersset-piece pressure
2323
4.64
Avg Corners For

Average corners won per match — attacking territorial pressure (> 5.5 is heavy).

5.09
22/23
5.45
Avg Corners Against

Average corners conceded per match — territorial pressure faced (lower is better).

5.17
22/23
46%
Corner Share48%

Share of total corners in the team's matches that went to the team — territorial dominance ratio.

50%
22/23
0.60
EWMACorners Diff

Smoothed corner differential per match — long-term territorial advantage (±2 is strong).

-0.42
59%13/22
Match Corners > 8.564%

Share of matches with total corners > 8.5 (Over 8.5 line) — high-tempo encounter signal.

70%16/23
22/23
55%12/22
Match Corners > 9.553%

Share of matches with total corners > 9.5 (Over 9.5 line).

52%12/23
22/23
55%12/22
Match Corners > 10.549%

Share of matches with total corners > 10.5 (Over 10.5 line) — corner-heavy clashes only.

43%10/23
22/23

Cards & Discipline

Cards & Disciplineyellows, reds & fouls
events 23/2323/232323
2.23
Avg Yellow Cards

Yellow cards picked up per match — discipline signal (lower is better).

1.52
22/23
5%1/22
Red Card Match Rate

Share of matches with at least one red card to the team — sending-off risk.

4%1/23
22/23
11.27
Avg Fouls

Fouls committed per match — aggression / tactical-foul tendency (lower is calmer).

9.74
22/23
68%13/19
Match Cards > 3.578%

Share of matches with total card points (both teams, yellow=1 / red=2, 2Y→R counted as 2) > 3.5 — Over 3.5 line.

88%14/16
19/2316/23
68%13/19
Match Cards > 4.565%

Share of matches with total card points > 4.5 — Over 4.5 line.

63%10/16
19/2316/23
58%
Cards in 2nd Half

Share of card events that occur after halftime — late-discipline tendency.

74%

Venue Edge

Venue EdgeGent at home · Anderlecht on the road
1111
1.64
PPG at Venue

Points per match at the venue — home team at home, away team away.

1.64
45%5/11
Win Rate45%

Share of sampled matches won.

45%5/11
27%3/11
Loss Rate

Share of sampled matches lost (lower is better).

27%3/11
1.91
Avg Goals Scored

Goals scored per match across the sampled games.

1.55
1.00
Avg Goals Conceded

Goals conceded per match (lower is better).

0.82
36%4/11
Clean Sheet41%

Share of matches with no goals conceded.

45%5/11
55%6/11
BTTS50%

Share of matches where both teams scored.

45%5/11
45%5/11
Over 2.545%

Share of venue matches with total goals > 2.5.

45%5/11
1.92
EWMAAttack xG (EWMA)

Smoothed xG created at venue — long-term attacking strength in this fixture's venue context.

1.41
1.14
EWMADefense xG (EWMA)

Smoothed xG conceded at venue — defensive strength in this fixture's venue context (lower is better).

1.28