Jupiler Pro League·
Regular Season - 20·12/27/2024·14:45
Anderlecht
Anderlecht
LWWWW
2-3
Finished
HT2-1
Dender
Dender
LWWLD
📍 Lotto Park, Brussel
Season statsJupiler Pro League
Anderlecht19matchesDender19matches

Every panel below reflects each team's matches in Jupiler Pro League.

Coverage varies by leaguetop-tier competitions have richer per-match data; lower divisions and smaller leagues track fewer metrics, so some panels may be sparse or missing entirely.
Pre-match snapshotevery value reflects each team's state going into kick-off — frozen before the match starts, not updated live.

Overall

Overallteam-strength snapshot
70%
Overall

Composite team strength — average of LTQ and Hype.

52%
1766
ELO

Chess-style strength rating going into kick-off.

1466
73%
LTQ

Long-term quality across all competitions.

44%
66%
Hype

Short-term fixture buzz / excitement signal.

59%
2.76
Momentum

Recent goal-scoring trend (weighted goals signal).

2.78

Match Outcome

Match Outcomeresults breakdown
1919
1.74
Points per Game

Average points per match across the sampled games (max 3).

1.26
47%
Win Rate

Share of sampled matches won.

32%
32%
Draw Rate

Share of sampled matches that ended level.

32%
21%
Loss Rate

Share of sampled matches lost (lower is better).

37%
47%
Clean Sheet37%

Share of matches with no goals conceded.

26%
26%
Failed to Score

Share of matches where the team didn't score (lower is better).

26%

Goal Scoring

Goal Scoringattacking output
1919
1.79
Avg Goals Scored

Goals scored per match across the sampled games.

1.26
74%
Scored > 0.574%

Share of matches where the team scored at least once.

74%
79%
Over 1.579%

Share of matches with total goals > 1.5.

79%
53%
Over 2.553%

Share of matches with total goals > 2.5.

53%
26%
Over 3.529%

Share of matches with total goals > 3.5 — high-scoring affairs.

32%
42%
BTTS50%

Share of matches where both teams scored.

58%
16%
BTTS & Win

Share of matches won while both teams scored — strong attack with a defensive lapse.

16%
47%
Scored Both Halves32%

Share of matches with a goal in both the 1st and 2nd half.

16%

Defensive Solidity

Defensive Soliditygoals & shots conceded
1919
0.79
Avg Goals Conceded

Goals conceded per match (lower is better).

1.63
14.89
Avg Shots Conceded

Total shots faced per match — defensive pressure (> 17.5/match is heavy siege).

15.28
18/19
4.79
Avg SoT Conceded

Shots on target faced per match — quality of chances given up (> 5.5 is severe).

4.94
18/19
4.00
Avg Saves

Goalkeeper saves per match (> 4.5 means the keeper is doing heavy lifting).

3.56
18/19
84%
Save %78%

Share of opponent shots on target stopped by the keeper.

72%
18/19
47%
Clean Sheet37%

Share of matches with no goals conceded.

26%

xG Trends

xG TrendsEWMA-smoothed performance
1919
1.84
EWMAxG For

Smoothed expected goals created per match — top attacks hit > 2.5/match, mid-table sits around 1.4.

1.23
1.28
EWMAxG Against

Smoothed expected goals conceded per match — elite defenses < 1.0, struggling sides > 2.0.

1.55
0.56
EWMAxG Diff

Net xG: attack minus defense. ±1 is dominant/poor; ±2 is title-contender or crisis-level.

-0.32
0.17
EWMAFinishing Edge

Goals scored minus xG. +0.3 is clinical, −0.3 is wasteful; ±1 is statistical outlier.

0.11
0.14
EWMAxG per Shot

Average chance quality per attempt — 0.10 is mid, 0.15+ means the team only shoots from dangerous spots.

0.12

Shots Quality

Shots Qualityvolume & accuracy
1919
14.05
Avg Shots

Total shots per match — pure attacking volume (> 16.5/match is elite).

9.83
18/19
5.21
Avg Shots on Target

Shots on target per match — strikes the keeper had to handle (> 5.5/match is heavy).

3.06
18/19
8.58
Avg Shots in Box

Shots taken from inside the penalty area — proximity to goal (> 8.5/match means consistent box presence).

6.56
18/19
61%
Box Shot %64%

Share of shots taken from inside the box — chance-selection quality. Mid sits ~60%, elite > 75%.

67%
18/19
37%
On-Target %34%

Share of shots that hit the target — striking accuracy. Mid ~33%, elite > 40%.

31%
18/19
13%
Shot Conversion13%

Goals per shot taken — clinical efficiency. ~10% is league average, > 15% is elite finishing.

12%
18/19

Possession & Passing

Possession & Passingball control
1919
58%
Avg Possession

Share of match time with the ball. > 55% is dominant, < 40% is reactive.

41%
18/19
85%
Pass Accuracy

Share of passes completed — distribution quality. Mid sits ~80%, elite > 88%.

75%
18/19
509.37
Avg Passes

Total passes attempted per match — distribution volume. Top sides > 550, bottom sides < 400.

384.11
18/19
0.12
EWMAPossession Trend

Smoothed possession differential — team minus opponent. ±0.1 is normal, ±0.2 is strong dominance.

-0.15

HT / FT Patterns

HT / FT Patternshalf-time vs full-time outcomes
1919
37%7/19
Leading at HT37%

Share of matches the team led at halftime — fast-start signal.

37%7/19
42%8/19
Level at HT

Share of matches level at halftime — balanced or low-tempo openings.

21%4/19
21%4/19
Trailing at HT

Share of matches the team trailed at halftime — slow starts (lower is better).

42%8/19
79%15/19
HT/FT Same Outcome79%

Share of matches where the W/D/L state at halftime matched the full-time result — game-state stability.

79%15/19
86%6/7
Led at HT → Won86%

Of matches led at HT, share converted into a full-time win — closing strength.

86%6/7
0%0/4
Trailed at HT → Recovered13%

Of matches trailing at HT, share rescued to a draw or win — comeback resilience.

25%2/8

Goal Timing

Goal Timingwhen goals happen
events 19/1919/191919
6%
0-15'16%

Hot starts — share of the team's goals scored in the opening 15 minutes.

25%
16%
16-30'16%

Early control — share scored between the 16th and 30th minute.

17%
23%
31-45'22%

Pre-HT push — share scored in the run-up to halftime.

21%
6%
46-60'9%

Restart wave — share scored in the first 15 minutes after HT.

13%
13%
61-75'11%

Game-state shift — share scored between minutes 61 and 75.

8%
35%
76-90+'26%

Late-game finishers — share scored from the 76th minute onwards (incl. stoppage time).

17%

First-Goal Edge

First-Goal Edgewho strikes first
events 19/1919/191919
56%9/16
Scored First55%

Share of matches where the team opened the scoring — fast-start signal.

53%9/17
44%7/16
Conceded First

Share of matches where the team conceded the opening goal (lower is better).

47%8/17
67%6/9
Win when Scoring First61%

Of matches the team scored first, share converted into a win — closing strength after the opener.

56%5/9
43%3/7
Win when Conceding First28%

Of matches conceding first, share rescued into a win — comeback strength.

13%1/8
31'
Avg Min. 1st Goal Scored

Average minute of the team's first goal — earlier means faster starters.

16'
23'
Avg Min. 1st Goal Conceded

Average minute of the first goal conceded — later is better (defense holds longer).

24'

Late-Game Strength

Late-Game Strengthafter the 75th minute
events 19/1919/191919
53%10/19
Scored after 75'37%

Share of matches with a late goal scored by the team — late finishers signal.

21%4/19
16%3/19
Conceded after 75'

Share of matches the team conceded a late goal — late-game vulnerability (lower is better).

21%4/19
100%6/6
Lead Saved after 75'83%

Of matches leading at 75', share closed out for a win — closing strength.

67%4/6
0%0/6
Lead Lost after 75'

Of matches leading at 75', share dropped to a draw or loss — late-game collapse risk.

33%2/6
16%3/19
Any Goal in Stoppage Time

Share of matches with any goal in stoppage time (90+) — late-drama frequency.

16%3/19

Set Pieces

Set Piecespenalty / own-goal share
events 19/1919/191919
87%27/31
Open-Play Share87%

Of the team's scored goals, share from open play — non-set-piece scoring quality.

88%21/24
13%4/31
Penalty Share

Of the team's scored goals, share from penalty kicks — penalty dependency.

4%1/24
0%0/31
Opp Own-Goal Bonus

Of the team's scored goals, share that were opponent own-goals — pressure / fortune.

8%2/24
0%0/18
Penalty Conceded Share

Of conceded goals, share from opponent penalties — defensive discipline (lower is better).

10%3/31
17%3/18
Own-Goal Cost

Of conceded goals, share that were the team's own goals — pressure-induced errors (lower is better).

6%2/31

Corners

Cornersset-piece pressure
1919
5.16
Avg Corners For

Average corners won per match — attacking territorial pressure (> 5.5 is heavy).

3.89
18/19
5.16
Avg Corners Against

Average corners conceded per match — territorial pressure faced (lower is better).

5.11
18/19
50%
Corner Share47%

Share of total corners in the team's matches that went to the team — territorial dominance ratio.

43%
18/19
-0.52
EWMACorners Diff

Smoothed corner differential per match — long-term territorial advantage (±2 is strong).

-0.98
74%14/19
Match Corners > 8.565%

Share of matches with total corners > 8.5 (Over 8.5 line) — high-tempo encounter signal.

56%10/18
18/19
53%10/19
Match Corners > 9.546%

Share of matches with total corners > 9.5 (Over 9.5 line).

39%7/18
18/19
42%8/19
Match Corners > 10.535%

Share of matches with total corners > 10.5 (Over 10.5 line) — corner-heavy clashes only.

28%5/18
18/19

Cards & Discipline

Cards & Disciplineyellows, reds & fouls
events 19/1919/191919
1.68
Avg Yellow Cards

Yellow cards picked up per match — discipline signal (lower is better).

2.22
18/19
5%1/19
Red Card Match Rate

Share of matches with at least one red card to the team — sending-off risk.

6%1/18
18/19
9.79
Avg Fouls

Fouls committed per match — aggression / tactical-foul tendency (lower is calmer).

10.33
18/19
79%11/14
Match Cards > 3.579%

Share of matches with total card points (both teams, yellow=1 / red=2, 2Y→R counted as 2) > 3.5 — Over 3.5 line.

80%12/15
14/1915/19
57%8/14
Match Cards > 4.555%

Share of matches with total card points > 4.5 — Over 4.5 line.

53%8/15
14/1915/19
72%
Cards in 2nd Half

Share of card events that occur after halftime — late-discipline tendency.

76%

Venue Edge

Venue EdgeAnderlecht at home · Dender on the road
99
2.00
PPG at Venue

Points per match at the venue — home team at home, away team away.

1.33
56%5/9
Win Rate44%

Share of sampled matches won.

33%3/9
11%1/9
Loss Rate

Share of sampled matches lost (lower is better).

33%3/9
2.11
Avg Goals Scored

Goals scored per match across the sampled games.

1.33
0.67
Avg Goals Conceded

Goals conceded per match (lower is better).

1.78
56%5/9
Clean Sheet39%

Share of matches with no goals conceded.

22%2/9
33%3/9
BTTS44%

Share of matches where both teams scored.

56%5/9
56%5/9
Over 2.561%

Share of venue matches with total goals > 2.5.

67%6/9
1.90
EWMAAttack xG (EWMA)

Smoothed xG created at venue — long-term attacking strength in this fixture's venue context.

1.38
1.02
EWMADefense xG (EWMA)

Smoothed xG conceded at venue — defensive strength in this fixture's venue context (lower is better).

1.59