Jupiler Pro League·
Regular Season - 19·12/22/2024·07:30
Genk
Genk
LWDDW
2-0
Finished
HT1-0
Anderlecht
Anderlecht
WWWWD
📍 Cegeka Arena, Genk
Season statsJupiler Pro League
Genk18matchesAnderlecht18matches

Every panel below reflects each team's matches in Jupiler Pro League.

Coverage varies by leaguetop-tier competitions have richer per-match data; lower divisions and smaller leagues track fewer metrics, so some panels may be sparse or missing entirely.
Pre-match snapshotevery value reflects each team's state going into kick-off — frozen before the match starts, not updated live.

Overall

Overallteam-strength snapshot
55%
Overall

Composite team strength — average of LTQ and Hype.

82%
1651
ELO

Chess-style strength rating going into kick-off.

1793
68%
LTQ

Long-term quality across all competitions.

78%
41%
Hype

Short-term fixture buzz / excitement signal.

85%
3.14
Momentum

Recent goal-scoring trend (weighted goals signal).

3.08

Match Outcome

Match Outcomeresults breakdown
1818
2.11
Points per Game

Average points per match across the sampled games (max 3).

1.83
67%
Win Rate

Share of sampled matches won.

50%
11%
Draw Rate

Share of sampled matches that ended level.

33%
22%
Loss Rate

Share of sampled matches lost (lower is better).

17%
39%
Clean Sheet44%

Share of matches with no goals conceded.

50%
17%
Failed to Score

Share of matches where the team didn't score (lower is better).

22%

Goal Scoring

Goal Scoringattacking output
1818
2.00
Avg Goals Scored

Goals scored per match across the sampled games.

1.89
83%
Scored > 0.581%

Share of matches where the team scored at least once.

78%
89%
Over 1.583%

Share of matches with total goals > 1.5.

78%
67%
Over 2.561%

Share of matches with total goals > 2.5.

56%
50%
Over 3.539%

Share of matches with total goals > 3.5 — high-scoring affairs.

28%
50%
BTTS47%

Share of matches where both teams scored.

44%
33%
BTTS & Win

Share of matches won while both teams scored — strong attack with a defensive lapse.

17%
39%
Scored Both Halves44%

Share of matches with a goal in both the 1st and 2nd half.

50%

Defensive Solidity

Defensive Soliditygoals & shots conceded
1818
1.39
Avg Goals Conceded

Goals conceded per match (lower is better).

0.72
12.22
Avg Shots Conceded

Total shots faced per match — defensive pressure (> 17.5/match is heavy siege).

14.78
3.89
Avg SoT Conceded

Shots on target faced per match — quality of chances given up (> 5.5 is severe).

4.78
2.44
Avg Saves

Goalkeeper saves per match (> 4.5 means the keeper is doing heavy lifting).

4.06
63%
Save %74%

Share of opponent shots on target stopped by the keeper.

85%
39%
Clean Sheet44%

Share of matches with no goals conceded.

50%

xG Trends

xG TrendsEWMA-smoothed performance
1818
1.77
EWMAxG For

Smoothed expected goals created per match — top attacks hit > 2.5/match, mid-table sits around 1.4.

2.00
1.26
EWMAxG Against

Smoothed expected goals conceded per match — elite defenses < 1.0, struggling sides > 2.0.

1.18
0.51
EWMAxG Diff

Net xG: attack minus defense. ±1 is dominant/poor; ±2 is title-contender or crisis-level.

0.82
-0.11
EWMAFinishing Edge

Goals scored minus xG. +0.3 is clinical, −0.3 is wasteful; ±1 is statistical outlier.

0.19
0.12
EWMAxG per Shot

Average chance quality per attempt — 0.10 is mid, 0.15+ means the team only shoots from dangerous spots.

0.15

Shots Quality

Shots Qualityvolume & accuracy
1818
16.61
Avg Shots

Total shots per match — pure attacking volume (> 16.5/match is elite).

14.44
6.11
Avg Shots on Target

Shots on target per match — strikes the keeper had to handle (> 5.5/match is heavy).

5.39
12.06
Avg Shots in Box

Shots taken from inside the penalty area — proximity to goal (> 8.5/match means consistent box presence).

8.83
73%
Box Shot %67%

Share of shots taken from inside the box — chance-selection quality. Mid sits ~60%, elite > 75%.

61%
37%
On-Target %37%

Share of shots that hit the target — striking accuracy. Mid ~33%, elite > 40%.

37%
12%
Shot Conversion13%

Goals per shot taken — clinical efficiency. ~10% is league average, > 15% is elite finishing.

13%

Possession & Passing

Possession & Passingball control
1818
61%
Avg Possession

Share of match time with the ball. > 55% is dominant, < 40% is reactive.

59%
87%
Pass Accuracy

Share of passes completed — distribution quality. Mid sits ~80%, elite > 88%.

85%
571.94
Avg Passes

Total passes attempted per match — distribution volume. Top sides > 550, bottom sides < 400.

513.06
0.20
EWMAPossession Trend

Smoothed possession differential — team minus opponent. ±0.1 is normal, ±0.2 is strong dominance.

0.13

HT / FT Patterns

HT / FT Patternshalf-time vs full-time outcomes
1818
33%6/18
Leading at HT36%

Share of matches the team led at halftime — fast-start signal.

39%7/18
44%8/18
Level at HT

Share of matches level at halftime — balanced or low-tempo openings.

44%8/18
22%4/18
Trailing at HT

Share of matches the team trailed at halftime — slow starts (lower is better).

17%3/18
50%9/18
HT/FT Same Outcome64%

Share of matches where the W/D/L state at halftime matched the full-time result — game-state stability.

78%14/18
83%5/6
Led at HT → Won85%

Of matches led at HT, share converted into a full-time win — closing strength.

86%6/7
25%1/4
Trailed at HT → Recovered13%

Of matches trailing at HT, share rescued to a draw or win — comeback resilience.

0%0/3

Goal Timing

Goal Timingwhen goals happen
events 18/1818/181818
9%
0-15'8%

Hot starts — share of the team's goals scored in the opening 15 minutes.

6%
14%
16-30'15%

Early control — share scored between the 16th and 30th minute.

16%
17%
31-45'20%

Pre-HT push — share scored in the run-up to halftime.

23%
17%
46-60'12%

Restart wave — share scored in the first 15 minutes after HT.

6%
11%
61-75'12%

Game-state shift — share scored between minutes 61 and 75.

13%
31%
76-90+'33%

Late-game finishers — share scored from the 76th minute onwards (incl. stoppage time).

35%

First-Goal Edge

First-Goal Edgewho strikes first
events 18/1818/181818
59%10/17
Scored First59%

Share of matches where the team opened the scoring — fast-start signal.

60%9/15
41%7/17
Conceded First

Share of matches where the team conceded the opening goal (lower is better).

40%6/15
80%8/10
Win when Scoring First73%

Of matches the team scored first, share converted into a win — closing strength after the opener.

67%6/9
57%4/7
Win when Conceding First54%

Of matches conceding first, share rescued into a win — comeback strength.

50%3/6
36'
Avg Min. 1st Goal Scored

Average minute of the team's first goal — earlier means faster starters.

31'
31'
Avg Min. 1st Goal Conceded

Average minute of the first goal conceded — later is better (defense holds longer).

22'

Late-Game Strength

Late-Game Strengthafter the 75th minute
events 18/1818/181818
33%6/18
Scored after 75'44%

Share of matches with a late goal scored by the team — late finishers signal.

56%10/18
28%5/18
Conceded after 75'

Share of matches the team conceded a late goal — late-game vulnerability (lower is better).

17%3/18
100%8/8
Lead Saved after 75'100%

Of matches leading at 75', share closed out for a win — closing strength.

100%6/6
0%0/8
Lead Lost after 75'

Of matches leading at 75', share dropped to a draw or loss — late-game collapse risk.

0%0/6
22%4/18
Any Goal in Stoppage Time

Share of matches with any goal in stoppage time (90+) — late-drama frequency.

17%3/18

Set Pieces

Set Piecespenalty / own-goal share
events 18/1818/181818
89%31/35
Open-Play Share88%

Of the team's scored goals, share from open play — non-set-piece scoring quality.

87%27/31
11%4/35
Penalty Share

Of the team's scored goals, share from penalty kicks — penalty dependency.

13%4/31
0%0/35
Opp Own-Goal Bonus

Of the team's scored goals, share that were opponent own-goals — pressure / fortune.

0%0/31
0%0/26
Penalty Conceded Share

Of conceded goals, share from opponent penalties — defensive discipline (lower is better).

0%0/16
4%1/26
Own-Goal Cost

Of conceded goals, share that were the team's own goals — pressure-induced errors (lower is better).

19%3/16

Corners

Cornersset-piece pressure
1818
5.50
Avg Corners For

Average corners won per match — attacking territorial pressure (> 5.5 is heavy).

5.17
3.78
Avg Corners Against

Average corners conceded per match — territorial pressure faced (lower is better).

4.89
59%
Corner Share55%

Share of total corners in the team's matches that went to the team — territorial dominance ratio.

51%
0.62
EWMACorners Diff

Smoothed corner differential per match — long-term territorial advantage (±2 is strong).

-0.14
67%12/18
Match Corners > 8.569%

Share of matches with total corners > 8.5 (Over 8.5 line) — high-tempo encounter signal.

72%13/18
50%9/18
Match Corners > 9.550%

Share of matches with total corners > 9.5 (Over 9.5 line).

50%9/18
39%7/18
Match Corners > 10.539%

Share of matches with total corners > 10.5 (Over 10.5 line) — corner-heavy clashes only.

39%7/18

Cards & Discipline

Cards & Disciplineyellows, reds & fouls
events 18/1818/181818
1.56
Avg Yellow Cards

Yellow cards picked up per match — discipline signal (lower is better).

1.72
6%1/18
Red Card Match Rate

Share of matches with at least one red card to the team — sending-off risk.

6%1/18
10.44
Avg Fouls

Fouls committed per match — aggression / tactical-foul tendency (lower is calmer).

9.89
81%13/16
Match Cards > 3.583%

Share of matches with total card points (both teams, yellow=1 / red=2, 2Y→R counted as 2) > 3.5 — Over 3.5 line.

85%11/13
16/1813/18
38%6/16
Match Cards > 4.550%

Share of matches with total card points > 4.5 — Over 4.5 line.

62%8/13
16/1813/18
68%
Cards in 2nd Half

Share of card events that occur after halftime — late-discipline tendency.

72%

Venue Edge

Venue EdgeGenk at home · Anderlecht on the road
99
2.78
PPG at Venue

Points per match at the venue — home team at home, away team away.

1.67
89%8/9
Win Rate67%

Share of sampled matches won.

44%4/9
0%0/9
Loss Rate

Share of sampled matches lost (lower is better).

22%2/9
2.33
Avg Goals Scored

Goals scored per match across the sampled games.

1.67
0.78
Avg Goals Conceded

Goals conceded per match (lower is better).

0.78
56%5/9
Clean Sheet50%

Share of matches with no goals conceded.

44%4/9
44%4/9
BTTS50%

Share of matches where both teams scored.

56%5/9
67%6/9
Over 2.561%

Share of venue matches with total goals > 2.5.

56%5/9
1.84
EWMAAttack xG (EWMA)

Smoothed xG created at venue — long-term attacking strength in this fixture's venue context.

1.76
1.05
EWMADefense xG (EWMA)

Smoothed xG conceded at venue — defensive strength in this fixture's venue context (lower is better).

1.35