Ligue 2·
Regular Season - 24·02/21/2025·14:00
Grenoble
Grenoble
WDWLW
1-1
Finished
HT1-0
Guingamp
Guingamp
LWWLW
📍 Stade des Alpes, Grenoble
Season statsLigue 2
Grenoble23matchesGuingamp23matches

Every panel below reflects each team's matches in Ligue 2.

Coverage varies by leaguetop-tier competitions have richer per-match data; lower divisions and smaller leagues track fewer metrics, so some panels may be sparse or missing entirely.
Pre-match snapshotevery value reflects each team's state going into kick-off — frozen before the match starts, not updated live.

Overall

Overallteam-strength snapshot
64%
Overall

Composite team strength — average of LTQ and Hype.

67%
1493
ELO

Chess-style strength rating going into kick-off.

1602
52%
LTQ

Long-term quality across all competitions.

67%
75%
Hype

Short-term fixture buzz / excitement signal.

67%
2.55
Momentum

Recent goal-scoring trend (weighted goals signal).

2.48

Match Outcome

Match Outcomeresults breakdown
2323
1.48
Points per Game

Average points per match across the sampled games (max 3).

1.65
43%
Win Rate

Share of sampled matches won.

52%
17%
Draw Rate

Share of sampled matches that ended level.

9%
39%
Loss Rate

Share of sampled matches lost (lower is better).

39%
35%
Clean Sheet37%

Share of matches with no goals conceded.

39%
39%
Failed to Score

Share of matches where the team didn't score (lower is better).

22%

Goal Scoring

Goal Scoringattacking output
2323
1.26
Avg Goals Scored

Goals scored per match across the sampled games.

1.65
61%
Scored > 0.570%

Share of matches where the team scored at least once.

78%
74%
Over 1.572%

Share of matches with total goals > 1.5.

70%
52%
Over 2.557%

Share of matches with total goals > 2.5.

61%
22%
Over 3.528%

Share of matches with total goals > 3.5 — high-scoring affairs.

35%
39%
BTTS39%

Share of matches where both teams scored.

39%
22%
BTTS & Win

Share of matches won while both teams scored — strong attack with a defensive lapse.

13%
26%
Scored Both Halves35%

Share of matches with a goal in both the 1st and 2nd half.

43%

Defensive Solidity

Defensive Soliditygoals & shots conceded
2323
1.17
Avg Goals Conceded

Goals conceded per match (lower is better).

1.22
12.17
Avg Shots Conceded

Total shots faced per match — defensive pressure (> 17.5/match is heavy siege).

12.22
4.96
Avg SoT Conceded

Shots on target faced per match — quality of chances given up (> 5.5 is severe).

4.52
4.00
Avg Saves

Goalkeeper saves per match (> 4.5 means the keeper is doing heavy lifting).

3.26
22/23
77%
Save %75%

Share of opponent shots on target stopped by the keeper.

72%
35%
Clean Sheet37%

Share of matches with no goals conceded.

39%

xG Trends

xG TrendsEWMA-smoothed performance
2323
1.69
EWMAxG For

Smoothed expected goals created per match — top attacks hit > 2.5/match, mid-table sits around 1.4.

2.11
1.45
EWMAxG Against

Smoothed expected goals conceded per match — elite defenses < 1.0, struggling sides > 2.0.

1.23
0.24
EWMAxG Diff

Net xG: attack minus defense. ±1 is dominant/poor; ±2 is title-contender or crisis-level.

0.88
-0.33
EWMAFinishing Edge

Goals scored minus xG. +0.3 is clinical, −0.3 is wasteful; ±1 is statistical outlier.

-0.34
0.14
EWMAxG per Shot

Average chance quality per attempt — 0.10 is mid, 0.15+ means the team only shoots from dangerous spots.

0.17

Shots Quality

Shots Qualityvolume & accuracy
2323
11.17
Avg Shots

Total shots per match — pure attacking volume (> 16.5/match is elite).

12.61
4.04
Avg Shots on Target

Shots on target per match — strikes the keeper had to handle (> 5.5/match is heavy).

4.61
6.78
Avg Shots in Box

Shots taken from inside the penalty area — proximity to goal (> 8.5/match means consistent box presence).

8.26
61%
Box Shot %63%

Share of shots taken from inside the box — chance-selection quality. Mid sits ~60%, elite > 75%.

66%
36%
On-Target %36%

Share of shots that hit the target — striking accuracy. Mid ~33%, elite > 40%.

37%
11%
Shot Conversion12%

Goals per shot taken — clinical efficiency. ~10% is league average, > 15% is elite finishing.

13%

Possession & Passing

Possession & Passingball control
2323
48%
Avg Possession

Share of match time with the ball. > 55% is dominant, < 40% is reactive.

53%
22/23
80%
Pass Accuracy

Share of passes completed — distribution quality. Mid sits ~80%, elite > 88%.

83%
22/23
432.36
Avg Passes

Total passes attempted per match — distribution volume. Top sides > 550, bottom sides < 400.

479.22
22/23
-0.06
EWMAPossession Trend

Smoothed possession differential — team minus opponent. ±0.1 is normal, ±0.2 is strong dominance.

0.06

HT / FT Patterns

HT / FT Patternshalf-time vs full-time outcomes
2323
26%6/23
Leading at HT37%

Share of matches the team led at halftime — fast-start signal.

48%11/23
57%13/23
Level at HT

Share of matches level at halftime — balanced or low-tempo openings.

30%7/23
17%4/23
Trailing at HT

Share of matches the team trailed at halftime — slow starts (lower is better).

22%5/23
57%13/23
HT/FT Same Outcome65%

Share of matches where the W/D/L state at halftime matched the full-time result — game-state stability.

74%17/23
83%5/6
Led at HT → Won87%

Of matches led at HT, share converted into a full-time win — closing strength.

91%10/11
0%0/4
Trailed at HT → Recovered0%

Of matches trailing at HT, share rescued to a draw or win — comeback resilience.

0%0/5

Goal Timing

Goal Timingwhen goals happen
events 23/2323/232323
7%
0-15'11%

Hot starts — share of the team's goals scored in the opening 15 minutes.

15%
7%
16-30'8%

Early control — share scored between the 16th and 30th minute.

10%
23%
31-45'22%

Pre-HT push — share scored in the run-up to halftime.

21%
20%
46-60'16%

Restart wave — share scored in the first 15 minutes after HT.

13%
23%
61-75'18%

Game-state shift — share scored between minutes 61 and 75.

13%
20%
76-90+'24%

Late-game finishers — share scored from the 76th minute onwards (incl. stoppage time).

28%

First-Goal Edge

First-Goal Edgewho strikes first
events 23/2323/232323
50%10/20
Scored First53%

Share of matches where the team opened the scoring — fast-start signal.

57%13/23
50%10/20
Conceded First

Share of matches where the team conceded the opening goal (lower is better).

43%10/23
80%8/10
Win when Scoring First86%

Of matches the team scored first, share converted into a win — closing strength after the opener.

92%12/13
20%2/10
Win when Conceding First10%

Of matches conceding first, share rescued into a win — comeback strength.

0%0/10
45'
Avg Min. 1st Goal Scored

Average minute of the team's first goal — earlier means faster starters.

29'
33'
Avg Min. 1st Goal Conceded

Average minute of the first goal conceded — later is better (defense holds longer).

28'

Late-Game Strength

Late-Game Strengthafter the 75th minute
events 23/2323/232323
22%5/23
Scored after 75'30%

Share of matches with a late goal scored by the team — late finishers signal.

39%9/23
13%3/23
Conceded after 75'

Share of matches the team conceded a late goal — late-game vulnerability (lower is better).

13%3/23
100%9/9
Lead Saved after 75'100%

Of matches leading at 75', share closed out for a win — closing strength.

100%10/10
0%0/9
Lead Lost after 75'

Of matches leading at 75', share dropped to a draw or loss — late-game collapse risk.

0%0/10
22%5/23
Any Goal in Stoppage Time

Share of matches with any goal in stoppage time (90+) — late-drama frequency.

17%4/23

Set Pieces

Set Piecespenalty / own-goal share
events 23/2323/232323
90%27/30
Open-Play Share92%

Of the team's scored goals, share from open play — non-set-piece scoring quality.

95%37/39
7%2/30
Penalty Share

Of the team's scored goals, share from penalty kicks — penalty dependency.

3%1/39
3%1/30
Opp Own-Goal Bonus

Of the team's scored goals, share that were opponent own-goals — pressure / fortune.

3%1/39
0%0/26
Penalty Conceded Share

Of conceded goals, share from opponent penalties — defensive discipline (lower is better).

19%5/27
0%0/26
Own-Goal Cost

Of conceded goals, share that were the team's own goals — pressure-induced errors (lower is better).

0%0/27

Corners

Cornersset-piece pressure
2323
4.41
Avg Corners For

Average corners won per match — attacking territorial pressure (> 5.5 is heavy).

4.70
22/23
5.86
Avg Corners Against

Average corners conceded per match — territorial pressure faced (lower is better).

4.74
22/23
43%
Corner Share46%

Share of total corners in the team's matches that went to the team — territorial dominance ratio.

50%
22/23
-1.26
EWMACorners Diff

Smoothed corner differential per match — long-term territorial advantage (±2 is strong).

0.33
64%14/22
Match Corners > 8.564%

Share of matches with total corners > 8.5 (Over 8.5 line) — high-tempo encounter signal.

65%15/23
22/23
55%12/22
Match Corners > 9.556%

Share of matches with total corners > 9.5 (Over 9.5 line).

57%13/23
22/23
55%12/22
Match Corners > 10.549%

Share of matches with total corners > 10.5 (Over 10.5 line) — corner-heavy clashes only.

43%10/23
22/23

Cards & Discipline

Cards & Disciplineyellows, reds & fouls
events 23/2323/232323
1.52
Avg Yellow Cards

Yellow cards picked up per match — discipline signal (lower is better).

1.17
9%2/23
Red Card Match Rate

Share of matches with at least one red card to the team — sending-off risk.

4%1/23
12.39
Avg Fouls

Fouls committed per match — aggression / tactical-foul tendency (lower is calmer).

13.13
70%14/20
Match Cards > 3.568%

Share of matches with total card points (both teams, yellow=1 / red=2, 2Y→R counted as 2) > 3.5 — Over 3.5 line.

67%12/18
20/2318/23
45%9/20
Match Cards > 4.545%

Share of matches with total card points > 4.5 — Over 4.5 line.

44%8/18
20/2318/23
64%
Cards in 2nd Half

Share of card events that occur after halftime — late-discipline tendency.

58%

Venue Edge

Venue EdgeGrenoble at home · Guingamp on the road
1211
2.00
PPG at Venue

Points per match at the venue — home team at home, away team away.

1.64
58%7/12
Win Rate56%

Share of sampled matches won.

55%6/11
17%2/12
Loss Rate

Share of sampled matches lost (lower is better).

45%5/11
1.42
Avg Goals Scored

Goals scored per match across the sampled games.

1.36
0.75
Avg Goals Conceded

Goals conceded per match (lower is better).

1.36
42%5/12
Clean Sheet39%

Share of matches with no goals conceded.

36%4/11
42%5/12
BTTS44%

Share of matches where both teams scored.

45%5/11
42%5/12
Over 2.548%

Share of venue matches with total goals > 2.5.

55%6/11
1.37
EWMAAttack xG (EWMA)

Smoothed xG created at venue — long-term attacking strength in this fixture's venue context.

2.36
1.04
EWMADefense xG (EWMA)

Smoothed xG conceded at venue — defensive strength in this fixture's venue context (lower is better).

1.15