Ligue 2·
Regular Season - 17·01/04/2025·08:00
Guingamp
Guingamp
WLWWW
1-1
Finished
HT0-0
Dunkerque
Dunkerque
WWLWW
📍 Stade du Roudourou, Guingamp
Season statsLigue 2
Guingamp16matchesDunkerque16matches

Every panel below reflects each team's matches in Ligue 2.

Coverage varies by leaguetop-tier competitions have richer per-match data; lower divisions and smaller leagues track fewer metrics, so some panels may be sparse or missing entirely.
Pre-match snapshotevery value reflects each team's state going into kick-off — frozen before the match starts, not updated live.

Overall

Overallteam-strength snapshot
68%
Overall

Composite team strength — average of LTQ and Hype.

69%
1599
ELO

Chess-style strength rating going into kick-off.

1588
64%
LTQ

Long-term quality across all competitions.

69%
71%
Hype

Short-term fixture buzz / excitement signal.

68%
3.18
Momentum

Recent goal-scoring trend (weighted goals signal).

1.98

Match Outcome

Match Outcomeresults breakdown
1616
1.56
Points per Game

Average points per match across the sampled games (max 3).

1.94
50%
Win Rate

Share of sampled matches won.

63%
6%
Draw Rate

Share of sampled matches that ended level.

6%
44%
Loss Rate

Share of sampled matches lost (lower is better).

31%
38%
Clean Sheet34%

Share of matches with no goals conceded.

31%
19%
Failed to Score

Share of matches where the team didn't score (lower is better).

13%

Goal Scoring

Goal Scoringattacking output
1616
1.63
Avg Goals Scored

Goals scored per match across the sampled games.

1.63
81%
Scored > 0.584%

Share of matches where the team scored at least once.

88%
69%
Over 1.572%

Share of matches with total goals > 1.5.

75%
63%
Over 2.556%

Share of matches with total goals > 2.5.

50%
44%
Over 3.541%

Share of matches with total goals > 3.5 — high-scoring affairs.

38%
44%
BTTS50%

Share of matches where both teams scored.

56%
13%
BTTS & Win

Share of matches won while both teams scored — strong attack with a defensive lapse.

31%
44%
Scored Both Halves34%

Share of matches with a goal in both the 1st and 2nd half.

25%

Defensive Solidity

Defensive Soliditygoals & shots conceded
1616
1.38
Avg Goals Conceded

Goals conceded per match (lower is better).

1.31
12.56
Avg Shots Conceded

Total shots faced per match — defensive pressure (> 17.5/match is heavy siege).

8.75
4.88
Avg SoT Conceded

Shots on target faced per match — quality of chances given up (> 5.5 is severe).

3.00
3.50
Avg Saves

Goalkeeper saves per match (> 4.5 means the keeper is doing heavy lifting).

2.07
15/16
72%
Save %68%

Share of opponent shots on target stopped by the keeper.

65%
38%
Clean Sheet34%

Share of matches with no goals conceded.

31%

xG Trends

xG TrendsEWMA-smoothed performance
1616
2.23
EWMAxG For

Smoothed expected goals created per match — top attacks hit > 2.5/match, mid-table sits around 1.4.

1.73
1.42
EWMAxG Against

Smoothed expected goals conceded per match — elite defenses < 1.0, struggling sides > 2.0.

1.15
0.81
EWMAxG Diff

Net xG: attack minus defense. ±1 is dominant/poor; ±2 is title-contender or crisis-level.

0.59
-0.44
EWMAFinishing Edge

Goals scored minus xG. +0.3 is clinical, −0.3 is wasteful; ±1 is statistical outlier.

-0.30
0.17
EWMAxG per Shot

Average chance quality per attempt — 0.10 is mid, 0.15+ means the team only shoots from dangerous spots.

0.15

Shots Quality

Shots Qualityvolume & accuracy
1616
13.56
Avg Shots

Total shots per match — pure attacking volume (> 16.5/match is elite).

11.69
5.00
Avg Shots on Target

Shots on target per match — strikes the keeper had to handle (> 5.5/match is heavy).

4.63
8.69
Avg Shots in Box

Shots taken from inside the penalty area — proximity to goal (> 8.5/match means consistent box presence).

7.06
64%
Box Shot %62%

Share of shots taken from inside the box — chance-selection quality. Mid sits ~60%, elite > 75%.

60%
37%
On-Target %38%

Share of shots that hit the target — striking accuracy. Mid ~33%, elite > 40%.

40%
12%
Shot Conversion13%

Goals per shot taken — clinical efficiency. ~10% is league average, > 15% is elite finishing.

14%

Possession & Passing

Possession & Passingball control
1616
55%
Avg Possession

Share of match time with the ball. > 55% is dominant, < 40% is reactive.

56%
15/16
84%
Pass Accuracy

Share of passes completed — distribution quality. Mid sits ~80%, elite > 88%.

81%
15/16
486.56
Avg Passes

Total passes attempted per match — distribution volume. Top sides > 550, bottom sides < 400.

470.40
15/16
0.04
EWMAPossession Trend

Smoothed possession differential — team minus opponent. ±0.1 is normal, ±0.2 is strong dominance.

0.10

HT / FT Patterns

HT / FT Patternshalf-time vs full-time outcomes
1616
44%7/16
Leading at HT44%

Share of matches the team led at halftime — fast-start signal.

44%7/16
38%6/16
Level at HT

Share of matches level at halftime — balanced or low-tempo openings.

31%5/16
19%3/16
Trailing at HT

Share of matches the team trailed at halftime — slow starts (lower is better).

25%4/16
63%10/16
HT/FT Same Outcome50%

Share of matches where the W/D/L state at halftime matched the full-time result — game-state stability.

38%6/16
86%6/7
Led at HT → Won79%

Of matches led at HT, share converted into a full-time win — closing strength.

71%5/7
0%0/3
Trailed at HT → Recovered38%

Of matches trailing at HT, share rescued to a draw or win — comeback resilience.

75%3/4

Goal Timing

Goal Timingwhen goals happen
events 16/1616/161616
11%
0-15'8%

Hot starts — share of the team's goals scored in the opening 15 minutes.

4%
15%
16-30'14%

Early control — share scored between the 16th and 30th minute.

13%
22%
31-45'22%

Pre-HT push — share scored in the run-up to halftime.

21%
7%
46-60'12%

Restart wave — share scored in the first 15 minutes after HT.

17%
15%
61-75'22%

Game-state shift — share scored between minutes 61 and 75.

29%
30%
76-90+'23%

Late-game finishers — share scored from the 76th minute onwards (incl. stoppage time).

17%

First-Goal Edge

First-Goal Edgewho strikes first
events 16/1616/161616
56%9/16
Scored First56%

Share of matches where the team opened the scoring — fast-start signal.

56%9/16
44%7/16
Conceded First

Share of matches where the team conceded the opening goal (lower is better).

44%7/16
89%8/9
Win when Scoring First89%

Of matches the team scored first, share converted into a win — closing strength after the opener.

89%8/9
0%0/7
Win when Conceding First14%

Of matches conceding first, share rescued into a win — comeback strength.

29%2/7
35'
Avg Min. 1st Goal Scored

Average minute of the team's first goal — earlier means faster starters.

38'
23'
Avg Min. 1st Goal Conceded

Average minute of the first goal conceded — later is better (defense holds longer).

41'

Late-Game Strength

Late-Game Strengthafter the 75th minute
events 16/1616/161616
44%7/16
Scored after 75'34%

Share of matches with a late goal scored by the team — late finishers signal.

25%4/16
13%2/16
Conceded after 75'

Share of matches the team conceded a late goal — late-game vulnerability (lower is better).

31%5/16
100%6/6
Lead Saved after 75'100%

Of matches leading at 75', share closed out for a win — closing strength.

100%8/8
0%0/6
Lead Lost after 75'

Of matches leading at 75', share dropped to a draw or loss — late-game collapse risk.

0%0/8
6%1/16
Any Goal in Stoppage Time

Share of matches with any goal in stoppage time (90+) — late-drama frequency.

6%1/16

Set Pieces

Set Piecespenalty / own-goal share
events 16/1616/161616
93%25/27
Open-Play Share88%

Of the team's scored goals, share from open play — non-set-piece scoring quality.

83%20/24
4%1/27
Penalty Share

Of the team's scored goals, share from penalty kicks — penalty dependency.

17%4/24
4%1/27
Opp Own-Goal Bonus

Of the team's scored goals, share that were opponent own-goals — pressure / fortune.

0%0/24
19%4/21
Penalty Conceded Share

Of conceded goals, share from opponent penalties — defensive discipline (lower is better).

4%1/23
0%0/21
Own-Goal Cost

Of conceded goals, share that were the team's own goals — pressure-induced errors (lower is better).

9%2/23

Corners

Cornersset-piece pressure
1616
4.94
Avg Corners For

Average corners won per match — attacking territorial pressure (> 5.5 is heavy).

4.00
15/16
5.13
Avg Corners Against

Average corners conceded per match — territorial pressure faced (lower is better).

4.00
15/16
49%
Corner Share50%

Share of total corners in the team's matches that went to the team — territorial dominance ratio.

50%
15/16
-0.84
EWMACorners Diff

Smoothed corner differential per match — long-term territorial advantage (±2 is strong).

-0.28
75%12/16
Match Corners > 8.557%

Share of matches with total corners > 8.5 (Over 8.5 line) — high-tempo encounter signal.

40%6/15
15/16
69%11/16
Match Corners > 9.551%

Share of matches with total corners > 9.5 (Over 9.5 line).

33%5/15
15/16
50%8/16
Match Corners > 10.535%

Share of matches with total corners > 10.5 (Over 10.5 line) — corner-heavy clashes only.

20%3/15
15/16

Cards & Discipline

Cards & Disciplineyellows, reds & fouls
events 16/1616/161616
1.19
Avg Yellow Cards

Yellow cards picked up per match — discipline signal (lower is better).

2.06
6%1/16
Red Card Match Rate

Share of matches with at least one red card to the team — sending-off risk.

6%1/16
13.31
Avg Fouls

Fouls committed per match — aggression / tactical-foul tendency (lower is calmer).

12.19
73%8/11
Match Cards > 3.579%

Share of matches with total card points (both teams, yellow=1 / red=2, 2Y→R counted as 2) > 3.5 — Over 3.5 line.

86%12/14
11/1614/16
55%6/11
Match Cards > 4.556%

Share of matches with total card points > 4.5 — Over 4.5 line.

57%8/14
11/1614/16
54%
Cards in 2nd Half

Share of card events that occur after halftime — late-discipline tendency.

75%

Venue Edge

Venue EdgeGuingamp at home · Dunkerque on the road
87
2.00
PPG at Venue

Points per match at the venue — home team at home, away team away.

1.00
63%5/8
Win Rate46%

Share of sampled matches won.

29%2/7
25%2/8
Loss Rate

Share of sampled matches lost (lower is better).

57%4/7
2.38
Avg Goals Scored

Goals scored per match across the sampled games.

1.29
1.00
Avg Goals Conceded

Goals conceded per match (lower is better).

1.86
50%4/8
Clean Sheet39%

Share of matches with no goals conceded.

29%2/7
38%3/8
BTTS47%

Share of matches where both teams scored.

57%4/7
75%6/8
Over 2.559%

Share of venue matches with total goals > 2.5.

43%3/7
2.22
EWMAAttack xG (EWMA)

Smoothed xG created at venue — long-term attacking strength in this fixture's venue context.

1.35
1.19
EWMADefense xG (EWMA)

Smoothed xG conceded at venue — defensive strength in this fixture's venue context (lower is better).

1.31