Eerste Divisie·
Regular Season - 24·02/01/2025·12:45
MVV
MVV
LWLWL
3-2
Finished
HT1-1
Roda
Roda
WLWLL
📍 De Geusselt, Maastricht
Season statsEerste Divisie
MVV23matchesRoda23matches

Every panel below reflects each team's matches in Eerste Divisie.

Coverage varies by leaguetop-tier competitions have richer per-match data; lower divisions and smaller leagues track fewer metrics, so some panels may be sparse or missing entirely.
Pre-match snapshotevery value reflects each team's state going into kick-off — frozen before the match starts, not updated live.

Overall

Overallteam-strength snapshot
45%
Overall

Composite team strength — average of LTQ and Hype.

62%
1440
ELO

Chess-style strength rating going into kick-off.

1467
50%
LTQ

Long-term quality across all competitions.

63%
40%
Hype

Short-term fixture buzz / excitement signal.

61%
3.47
Momentum

Recent goal-scoring trend (weighted goals signal).

2.45

Match Outcome

Match Outcomeresults breakdown
2323
1.13
Points per Game

Average points per match across the sampled games (max 3).

1.57
26%
Win Rate

Share of sampled matches won.

43%
35%
Draw Rate

Share of sampled matches that ended level.

26%
39%
Loss Rate

Share of sampled matches lost (lower is better).

30%
17%
Clean Sheet28%

Share of matches with no goals conceded.

39%
30%
Failed to Score

Share of matches where the team didn't score (lower is better).

26%

Goal Scoring

Goal Scoringattacking output
2323
1.57
Avg Goals Scored

Goals scored per match across the sampled games.

1.35
70%
Scored > 0.572%

Share of matches where the team scored at least once.

74%
78%
Over 1.574%

Share of matches with total goals > 1.5.

70%
57%
Over 2.554%

Share of matches with total goals > 2.5.

52%
48%
Over 3.537%

Share of matches with total goals > 3.5 — high-scoring affairs.

26%
61%
BTTS54%

Share of matches where both teams scored.

48%
17%
BTTS & Win

Share of matches won while both teams scored — strong attack with a defensive lapse.

17%
22%
Scored Both Halves24%

Share of matches with a goal in both the 1st and 2nd half.

26%

Defensive Solidity

Defensive Soliditygoals & shots conceded
2323
1.57
Avg Goals Conceded

Goals conceded per match (lower is better).

1.22
15.96
Avg Shots Conceded

Total shots faced per match — defensive pressure (> 17.5/match is heavy siege).

12.48
6.43
Avg SoT Conceded

Shots on target faced per match — quality of chances given up (> 5.5 is severe).

5.09
5.04
Avg Saves

Goalkeeper saves per match (> 4.5 means the keeper is doing heavy lifting).

3.87
78%
Save %77%

Share of opponent shots on target stopped by the keeper.

76%
17%
Clean Sheet28%

Share of matches with no goals conceded.

39%

xG Trends

xG TrendsEWMA-smoothed performance
2323
2.22
EWMAxG For

Smoothed expected goals created per match — top attacks hit > 2.5/match, mid-table sits around 1.4.

1.80
1.86
EWMAxG Against

Smoothed expected goals conceded per match — elite defenses < 1.0, struggling sides > 2.0.

1.37
0.36
EWMAxG Diff

Net xG: attack minus defense. ±1 is dominant/poor; ±2 is title-contender or crisis-level.

0.43
-0.43
EWMAFinishing Edge

Goals scored minus xG. +0.3 is clinical, −0.3 is wasteful; ±1 is statistical outlier.

-0.31
0.18
EWMAxG per Shot

Average chance quality per attempt — 0.10 is mid, 0.15+ means the team only shoots from dangerous spots.

0.11

Shots Quality

Shots Qualityvolume & accuracy
2323
11.96
Avg Shots

Total shots per match — pure attacking volume (> 16.5/match is elite).

15.52
4.74
Avg Shots on Target

Shots on target per match — strikes the keeper had to handle (> 5.5/match is heavy).

5.91
7.57
Avg Shots in Box

Shots taken from inside the penalty area — proximity to goal (> 8.5/match means consistent box presence).

8.52
63%
Box Shot %59%

Share of shots taken from inside the box — chance-selection quality. Mid sits ~60%, elite > 75%.

55%
40%
On-Target %39%

Share of shots that hit the target — striking accuracy. Mid ~33%, elite > 40%.

38%
13%
Shot Conversion11%

Goals per shot taken — clinical efficiency. ~10% is league average, > 15% is elite finishing.

9%

Possession & Passing

Possession & Passingball control
2323
46%
Avg Possession

Share of match time with the ball. > 55% is dominant, < 40% is reactive.

51%
76%
Pass Accuracy

Share of passes completed — distribution quality. Mid sits ~80%, elite > 88%.

80%
384.48
Avg Passes

Total passes attempted per match — distribution volume. Top sides > 550, bottom sides < 400.

428.83
-0.09
EWMAPossession Trend

Smoothed possession differential — team minus opponent. ±0.1 is normal, ±0.2 is strong dominance.

0.01

HT / FT Patterns

HT / FT Patternshalf-time vs full-time outcomes
2323
22%5/23
Leading at HT28%

Share of matches the team led at halftime — fast-start signal.

35%8/23
39%9/23
Level at HT

Share of matches level at halftime — balanced or low-tempo openings.

30%7/23
39%9/23
Trailing at HT

Share of matches the team trailed at halftime — slow starts (lower is better).

35%8/23
61%14/23
HT/FT Same Outcome65%

Share of matches where the W/D/L state at halftime matched the full-time result — game-state stability.

70%16/23
80%4/5
Led at HT → Won84%

Of matches led at HT, share converted into a full-time win — closing strength.

88%7/8
44%4/9
Trailed at HT → Recovered41%

Of matches trailing at HT, share rescued to a draw or win — comeback resilience.

38%3/8

Goal Timing

Goal Timingwhen goals happen
events 23/2323/232323
12%
0-15'14%

Hot starts — share of the team's goals scored in the opening 15 minutes.

17%
15%
16-30'11%

Early control — share scored between the 16th and 30th minute.

7%
6%
31-45'11%

Pre-HT push — share scored in the run-up to halftime.

17%
24%
46-60'18%

Restart wave — share scored in the first 15 minutes after HT.

13%
15%
61-75'16%

Game-state shift — share scored between minutes 61 and 75.

17%
29%
76-90+'30%

Late-game finishers — share scored from the 76th minute onwards (incl. stoppage time).

30%

First-Goal Edge

First-Goal Edgewho strikes first
events 23/2323/232323
33%7/21
Scored First39%

Share of matches where the team opened the scoring — fast-start signal.

45%9/20
67%14/21
Conceded First

Share of matches where the team conceded the opening goal (lower is better).

55%11/20
43%3/7
Win when Scoring First66%

Of matches the team scored first, share converted into a win — closing strength after the opener.

89%8/9
21%3/14
Win when Conceding First20%

Of matches conceding first, share rescued into a win — comeback strength.

18%2/11
18'
Avg Min. 1st Goal Scored

Average minute of the team's first goal — earlier means faster starters.

27'
35'
Avg Min. 1st Goal Conceded

Average minute of the first goal conceded — later is better (defense holds longer).

29'

Late-Game Strength

Late-Game Strengthafter the 75th minute
events 23/2323/232323
35%8/23
Scored after 75'33%

Share of matches with a late goal scored by the team — late finishers signal.

30%7/23
43%10/23
Conceded after 75'

Share of matches the team conceded a late goal — late-game vulnerability (lower is better).

22%5/23
75%6/8
Lead Saved after 75'80%

Of matches leading at 75', share closed out for a win — closing strength.

86%6/7
25%2/8
Lead Lost after 75'

Of matches leading at 75', share dropped to a draw or loss — late-game collapse risk.

14%1/7
17%4/23
Any Goal in Stoppage Time

Share of matches with any goal in stoppage time (90+) — late-drama frequency.

22%5/23

Set Pieces

Set Piecespenalty / own-goal share
events 23/2323/232323
97%33/34
Open-Play Share94%

Of the team's scored goals, share from open play — non-set-piece scoring quality.

90%27/30
3%1/34
Penalty Share

Of the team's scored goals, share from penalty kicks — penalty dependency.

10%3/30
0%0/34
Opp Own-Goal Bonus

Of the team's scored goals, share that were opponent own-goals — pressure / fortune.

0%0/30
11%4/38
Penalty Conceded Share

Of conceded goals, share from opponent penalties — defensive discipline (lower is better).

7%2/29
5%2/38
Own-Goal Cost

Of conceded goals, share that were the team's own goals — pressure-induced errors (lower is better).

3%1/29

Corners

Cornersset-piece pressure
2323
4.96
Avg Corners For

Average corners won per match — attacking territorial pressure (> 5.5 is heavy).

5.61
5.65
Avg Corners Against

Average corners conceded per match — territorial pressure faced (lower is better).

4.52
47%
Corner Share51%

Share of total corners in the team's matches that went to the team — territorial dominance ratio.

55%
0.13
EWMACorners Diff

Smoothed corner differential per match — long-term territorial advantage (±2 is strong).

1.02
74%17/23
Match Corners > 8.576%

Share of matches with total corners > 8.5 (Over 8.5 line) — high-tempo encounter signal.

78%18/23
52%12/23
Match Corners > 9.557%

Share of matches with total corners > 9.5 (Over 9.5 line).

61%14/23
39%9/23
Match Corners > 10.539%

Share of matches with total corners > 10.5 (Over 10.5 line) — corner-heavy clashes only.

39%9/23

Cards & Discipline

Cards & Disciplineyellows, reds & fouls
events 23/2323/232323
1.78
Avg Yellow Cards

Yellow cards picked up per match — discipline signal (lower is better).

1.96
0%0/23
Red Card Match Rate

Share of matches with at least one red card to the team — sending-off risk.

4%1/23
13.70
Avg Fouls

Fouls committed per match — aggression / tactical-foul tendency (lower is calmer).

12.00
58%11/19
Match Cards > 3.560%

Share of matches with total card points (both teams, yellow=1 / red=2, 2Y→R counted as 2) > 3.5 — Over 3.5 line.

61%11/18
19/2318/23
32%6/19
Match Cards > 4.538%

Share of matches with total card points > 4.5 — Over 4.5 line.

44%8/18
19/2318/23
67%
Cards in 2nd Half

Share of card events that occur after halftime — late-discipline tendency.

65%

Venue Edge

Venue EdgeMVV at home · Roda on the road
1112
1.73
PPG at Venue

Points per match at the venue — home team at home, away team away.

1.33
45%5/11
Win Rate39%

Share of sampled matches won.

33%4/12
18%2/11
Loss Rate

Share of sampled matches lost (lower is better).

33%4/12
2.18
Avg Goals Scored

Goals scored per match across the sampled games.

1.33
1.18
Avg Goals Conceded

Goals conceded per match (lower is better).

1.67
27%3/11
Clean Sheet26%

Share of matches with no goals conceded.

25%3/12
64%7/11
BTTS65%

Share of matches where both teams scored.

67%8/12
73%8/11
Over 2.566%

Share of venue matches with total goals > 2.5.

58%7/12
2.77
EWMAAttack xG (EWMA)

Smoothed xG created at venue — long-term attacking strength in this fixture's venue context.

1.83
1.38
EWMADefense xG (EWMA)

Smoothed xG conceded at venue — defensive strength in this fixture's venue context (lower is better).

1.98