Eerste Divisie·
Regular Season - 17·12/02/2024·14:00
Jong AZ
Jong AZ
LDWLL
2-3
Finished
HT1-2
MVV
MVV
WDDLW
📍 AFAS Trainingscomplex, Wijdewormer
Season statsEerste Divisie
AZ16matchesMVV16matches

Every panel below reflects each team's matches in Eerste Divisie.

Coverage varies by leaguetop-tier competitions have richer per-match data; lower divisions and smaller leagues track fewer metrics, so some panels may be sparse or missing entirely.
Pre-match snapshotevery value reflects each team's state going into kick-off — frozen before the match starts, not updated live.

Overall

Overallteam-strength snapshot
46%
Overall

Composite team strength — average of LTQ and Hype.

61%
1416
ELO

Chess-style strength rating going into kick-off.

1442
41%
LTQ

Long-term quality across all competitions.

55%
50%
Hype

Short-term fixture buzz / excitement signal.

67%
3.48
Momentum

Recent goal-scoring trend (weighted goals signal).

2.70

Match Outcome

Match Outcomeresults breakdown
1616
1.12
Points per Game

Average points per match across the sampled games (max 3).

1.00
31%
Win Rate

Share of sampled matches won.

19%
19%
Draw Rate

Share of sampled matches that ended level.

44%
50%
Loss Rate

Share of sampled matches lost (lower is better).

38%
19%
Clean Sheet19%

Share of matches with no goals conceded.

19%
19%
Failed to Score

Share of matches where the team didn't score (lower is better).

31%

Goal Scoring

Goal Scoringattacking output
1616
1.75
Avg Goals Scored

Goals scored per match across the sampled games.

1.25
81%
Scored > 0.575%

Share of matches where the team scored at least once.

69%
75%
Over 1.575%

Share of matches with total goals > 1.5.

75%
75%
Over 2.563%

Share of matches with total goals > 2.5.

50%
56%
Over 3.547%

Share of matches with total goals > 3.5 — high-scoring affairs.

38%
69%
BTTS66%

Share of matches where both teams scored.

63%
19%
BTTS & Win

Share of matches won while both teams scored — strong attack with a defensive lapse.

13%
19%
Scored Both Halves16%

Share of matches with a goal in both the 1st and 2nd half.

13%

Defensive Solidity

Defensive Soliditygoals & shots conceded
1616
2.00
Avg Goals Conceded

Goals conceded per match (lower is better).

1.56
14.00
Avg Shots Conceded

Total shots faced per match — defensive pressure (> 17.5/match is heavy siege).

16.25
5.44
Avg SoT Conceded

Shots on target faced per match — quality of chances given up (> 5.5 is severe).

6.38
3.31
Avg Saves

Goalkeeper saves per match (> 4.5 means the keeper is doing heavy lifting).

5.00
61%
Save %70%

Share of opponent shots on target stopped by the keeper.

78%
19%
Clean Sheet19%

Share of matches with no goals conceded.

19%

xG Trends

xG TrendsEWMA-smoothed performance
1616
2.06
EWMAxG For

Smoothed expected goals created per match — top attacks hit > 2.5/match, mid-table sits around 1.4.

1.78
2.32
EWMAxG Against

Smoothed expected goals conceded per match — elite defenses < 1.0, struggling sides > 2.0.

1.80
-0.26
EWMAxG Diff

Net xG: attack minus defense. ±1 is dominant/poor; ±2 is title-contender or crisis-level.

-0.02
-0.33
EWMAFinishing Edge

Goals scored minus xG. +0.3 is clinical, −0.3 is wasteful; ±1 is statistical outlier.

-0.28
0.16
EWMAxG per Shot

Average chance quality per attempt — 0.10 is mid, 0.15+ means the team only shoots from dangerous spots.

0.16

Shots Quality

Shots Qualityvolume & accuracy
1616
13.06
Avg Shots

Total shots per match — pure attacking volume (> 16.5/match is elite).

11.63
4.94
Avg Shots on Target

Shots on target per match — strikes the keeper had to handle (> 5.5/match is heavy).

4.50
7.13
Avg Shots in Box

Shots taken from inside the penalty area — proximity to goal (> 8.5/match means consistent box presence).

7.19
55%
Box Shot %58%

Share of shots taken from inside the box — chance-selection quality. Mid sits ~60%, elite > 75%.

62%
38%
On-Target %38%

Share of shots that hit the target — striking accuracy. Mid ~33%, elite > 40%.

39%
13%
Shot Conversion12%

Goals per shot taken — clinical efficiency. ~10% is league average, > 15% is elite finishing.

11%

Possession & Passing

Possession & Passingball control
1616
58%
Avg Possession

Share of match time with the ball. > 55% is dominant, < 40% is reactive.

45%
84%
Pass Accuracy

Share of passes completed — distribution quality. Mid sits ~80%, elite > 88%.

76%
495.31
Avg Passes

Total passes attempted per match — distribution volume. Top sides > 550, bottom sides < 400.

381.75
0.15
EWMAPossession Trend

Smoothed possession differential — team minus opponent. ±0.1 is normal, ±0.2 is strong dominance.

-0.11

HT / FT Patterns

HT / FT Patternshalf-time vs full-time outcomes
1616
25%4/16
Leading at HT19%

Share of matches the team led at halftime — fast-start signal.

13%2/16
44%7/16
Level at HT

Share of matches level at halftime — balanced or low-tempo openings.

56%9/16
31%5/16
Trailing at HT

Share of matches the team trailed at halftime — slow starts (lower is better).

31%5/16
31%5/16
HT/FT Same Outcome41%

Share of matches where the W/D/L state at halftime matched the full-time result — game-state stability.

50%8/16
50%2/4
Led at HT → Won50%

Of matches led at HT, share converted into a full-time win — closing strength.

50%1/2
60%3/5
Trailed at HT → Recovered60%

Of matches trailing at HT, share rescued to a draw or win — comeback resilience.

60%3/5

Goal Timing

Goal Timingwhen goals happen
events 16/1616/161616
18%
0-15'17%

Hot starts — share of the team's goals scored in the opening 15 minutes.

16%
4%
16-30'4%

Early control — share scored between the 16th and 30th minute.

5%
18%
31-45'9%

Pre-HT push — share scored in the run-up to halftime.

0%
32%
46-60'29%

Restart wave — share scored in the first 15 minutes after HT.

26%
14%
61-75'18%

Game-state shift — share scored between minutes 61 and 75.

21%
14%
76-90+'23%

Late-game finishers — share scored from the 76th minute onwards (incl. stoppage time).

32%

First-Goal Edge

First-Goal Edgewho strikes first
events 16/1616/161616
40%6/15
Scored First38%

Share of matches where the team opened the scoring — fast-start signal.

36%5/14
60%9/15
Conceded First

Share of matches where the team conceded the opening goal (lower is better).

64%9/14
67%4/6
Win when Scoring First43%

Of matches the team scored first, share converted into a win — closing strength after the opener.

20%1/5
11%1/9
Win when Conceding First17%

Of matches conceding first, share rescued into a win — comeback strength.

22%2/9
35'
Avg Min. 1st Goal Scored

Average minute of the team's first goal — earlier means faster starters.

21'
28'
Avg Min. 1st Goal Conceded

Average minute of the first goal conceded — later is better (defense holds longer).

41'

Late-Game Strength

Late-Game Strengthafter the 75th minute
events 16/1616/161616
25%4/16
Scored after 75'28%

Share of matches with a late goal scored by the team — late finishers signal.

31%5/16
38%6/16
Conceded after 75'

Share of matches the team conceded a late goal — late-game vulnerability (lower is better).

44%7/16
80%4/5
Lead Saved after 75'70%

Of matches leading at 75', share closed out for a win — closing strength.

60%3/5
20%1/5
Lead Lost after 75'

Of matches leading at 75', share dropped to a draw or loss — late-game collapse risk.

40%2/5
13%2/16
Any Goal in Stoppage Time

Share of matches with any goal in stoppage time (90+) — late-drama frequency.

19%3/16

Set Pieces

Set Piecespenalty / own-goal share
events 16/1616/161616
89%25/28
Open-Play Share95%

Of the team's scored goals, share from open play — non-set-piece scoring quality.

100%19/19
11%3/28
Penalty Share

Of the team's scored goals, share from penalty kicks — penalty dependency.

0%0/19
0%0/28
Opp Own-Goal Bonus

Of the team's scored goals, share that were opponent own-goals — pressure / fortune.

0%0/19
6%2/32
Penalty Conceded Share

Of conceded goals, share from opponent penalties — defensive discipline (lower is better).

12%3/26
0%0/32
Own-Goal Cost

Of conceded goals, share that were the team's own goals — pressure-induced errors (lower is better).

4%1/26

Corners

Cornersset-piece pressure
1616
4.75
Avg Corners For

Average corners won per match — attacking territorial pressure (> 5.5 is heavy).

4.69
5.31
Avg Corners Against

Average corners conceded per match — territorial pressure faced (lower is better).

6.06
47%
Corner Share45%

Share of total corners in the team's matches that went to the team — territorial dominance ratio.

44%
-0.57
EWMACorners Diff

Smoothed corner differential per match — long-term territorial advantage (±2 is strong).

-1.00
56%9/16
Match Corners > 8.566%

Share of matches with total corners > 8.5 (Over 8.5 line) — high-tempo encounter signal.

75%12/16
50%8/16
Match Corners > 9.553%

Share of matches with total corners > 9.5 (Over 9.5 line).

56%9/16
50%8/16
Match Corners > 10.547%

Share of matches with total corners > 10.5 (Over 10.5 line) — corner-heavy clashes only.

44%7/16

Cards & Discipline

Cards & Disciplineyellows, reds & fouls
events 16/1616/161616
1.94
Avg Yellow Cards

Yellow cards picked up per match — discipline signal (lower is better).

1.81
6%1/16
Red Card Match Rate

Share of matches with at least one red card to the team — sending-off risk.

0%0/16
13.13
Avg Fouls

Fouls committed per match — aggression / tactical-foul tendency (lower is calmer).

12.38
77%10/13
Match Cards > 3.573%

Share of matches with total card points (both teams, yellow=1 / red=2, 2Y→R counted as 2) > 3.5 — Over 3.5 line.

69%9/13
13/1613/16
54%7/13
Match Cards > 4.554%

Share of matches with total card points > 4.5 — Over 4.5 line.

54%7/13
13/1613/16
54%
Cards in 2nd Half

Share of card events that occur after halftime — late-discipline tendency.

71%

Venue Edge

Venue EdgeAZ at home · MVV on the road
88
1.00
PPG at Venue

Points per match at the venue — home team at home, away team away.

0.50
25%2/8
Win Rate13%

Share of sampled matches won.

0%0/8
50%4/8
Loss Rate

Share of sampled matches lost (lower is better).

50%4/8
2.50
Avg Goals Scored

Goals scored per match across the sampled games.

1.00
2.13
Avg Goals Conceded

Goals conceded per match (lower is better).

1.88
0%0/8
Clean Sheet6%

Share of matches with no goals conceded.

13%1/8
88%7/8
BTTS75%

Share of matches where both teams scored.

63%5/8
88%7/8
Over 2.563%

Share of venue matches with total goals > 2.5.

38%3/8
2.83
EWMAAttack xG (EWMA)

Smoothed xG created at venue — long-term attacking strength in this fixture's venue context.

1.61
2.41
EWMADefense xG (EWMA)

Smoothed xG conceded at venue — defensive strength in this fixture's venue context (lower is better).

2.42