Challenger Pro League·
Regular Season - 30·04/18/2025·14:00
Patro Eisden
Patro Eisden
LDDWL
1-0
Finished
HT0-0
AS Eupen
AS Eupen
WLWWL
📍 Patrostadion, Maasmechelen
Season statsChallenger Pro League
Eisden28matchesEupen27matches

Every panel below reflects each team's matches in Challenger Pro League.

Coverage varies by leaguetop-tier competitions have richer per-match data; lower divisions and smaller leagues track fewer metrics, so some panels may be sparse or missing entirely.
Pre-match snapshotevery value reflects each team's state going into kick-off — frozen before the match starts, not updated live.

Overall

Overallteam-strength snapshot
56%
Overall

Composite team strength — average of LTQ and Hype.

53%
1545
ELO

Chess-style strength rating going into kick-off.

1391
62%
LTQ

Long-term quality across all competitions.

48%
49%
Hype

Short-term fixture buzz / excitement signal.

57%
2.04
Momentum

Recent goal-scoring trend (weighted goals signal).

2.68

Match Outcome

Match Outcomeresults breakdown
2827
1.75
Points per Game

Average points per match across the sampled games (max 3).

1.11
46%
Win Rate

Share of sampled matches won.

30%
36%
Draw Rate

Share of sampled matches that ended level.

22%
18%
Loss Rate

Share of sampled matches lost (lower is better).

48%
32%
Clean Sheet25%

Share of matches with no goals conceded.

19%
14%
Failed to Score

Share of matches where the team didn't score (lower is better).

33%

Goal Scoring

Goal Scoringattacking output
2827
1.89
Avg Goals Scored

Goals scored per match across the sampled games.

1.41
86%
Scored > 0.576%

Share of matches where the team scored at least once.

67%
75%
Over 1.576%

Share of matches with total goals > 1.5.

78%
54%
Over 2.562%

Share of matches with total goals > 2.5.

70%
50%
Over 3.549%

Share of matches with total goals > 3.5 — high-scoring affairs.

48%
61%
BTTS58%

Share of matches where both teams scored.

56%
21%
BTTS & Win

Share of matches won while both teams scored — strong attack with a defensive lapse.

19%
50%
Scored Both Halves40%

Share of matches with a goal in both the 1st and 2nd half.

30%

Defensive Solidity

Defensive Soliditygoals & shots conceded
2827
1.04
Avg Goals Conceded

Goals conceded per match (lower is better).

1.70
10.96
Avg Shots Conceded

Total shots faced per match — defensive pressure (> 17.5/match is heavy siege).

14.15
4.14
Avg SoT Conceded

Shots on target faced per match — quality of chances given up (> 5.5 is severe).

5.19
2.96
Avg Saves

Goalkeeper saves per match (> 4.5 means the keeper is doing heavy lifting).

3.41
72%
Save %69%

Share of opponent shots on target stopped by the keeper.

66%
32%
Clean Sheet25%

Share of matches with no goals conceded.

19%

xG Trends

xG TrendsEWMA-smoothed performance
2827
1.85
EWMAxG For

Smoothed expected goals created per match — top attacks hit > 2.5/match, mid-table sits around 1.4.

1.53
1.29
EWMAxG Against

Smoothed expected goals conceded per match — elite defenses < 1.0, struggling sides > 2.0.

1.94
0.56
EWMAxG Diff

Net xG: attack minus defense. ±1 is dominant/poor; ±2 is title-contender or crisis-level.

-0.41
-0.23
EWMAFinishing Edge

Goals scored minus xG. +0.3 is clinical, −0.3 is wasteful; ±1 is statistical outlier.

-0.24
0.13
EWMAxG per Shot

Average chance quality per attempt — 0.10 is mid, 0.15+ means the team only shoots from dangerous spots.

0.14

Shots Quality

Shots Qualityvolume & accuracy
2827
14.39
Avg Shots

Total shots per match — pure attacking volume (> 16.5/match is elite).

10.74
5.61
Avg Shots on Target

Shots on target per match — strikes the keeper had to handle (> 5.5/match is heavy).

3.93
10.04
Avg Shots in Box

Shots taken from inside the penalty area — proximity to goal (> 8.5/match means consistent box presence).

7.41
70%
Box Shot %69%

Share of shots taken from inside the box — chance-selection quality. Mid sits ~60%, elite > 75%.

69%
39%
On-Target %38%

Share of shots that hit the target — striking accuracy. Mid ~33%, elite > 40%.

37%
13%
Shot Conversion13%

Goals per shot taken — clinical efficiency. ~10% is league average, > 15% is elite finishing.

13%

Possession & Passing

Possession & Passingball control
2827
38%
Avg Possession

Share of match time with the ball. > 55% is dominant, < 40% is reactive.

50%
65%
Pass Accuracy

Share of passes completed — distribution quality. Mid sits ~80%, elite > 88%.

76%
267.57
Avg Passes

Total passes attempted per match — distribution volume. Top sides > 550, bottom sides < 400.

403.85
-0.22
EWMAPossession Trend

Smoothed possession differential — team minus opponent. ±0.1 is normal, ±0.2 is strong dominance.

-0.04

HT / FT Patterns

HT / FT Patternshalf-time vs full-time outcomes
2827
43%12/28
Leading at HT33%

Share of matches the team led at halftime — fast-start signal.

22%6/27
46%13/28
Level at HT

Share of matches level at halftime — balanced or low-tempo openings.

37%10/27
11%3/28
Trailing at HT

Share of matches the team trailed at halftime — slow starts (lower is better).

41%11/27
64%18/28
HT/FT Same Outcome60%

Share of matches where the W/D/L state at halftime matched the full-time result — game-state stability.

56%15/27
75%9/12
Led at HT → Won79%

Of matches led at HT, share converted into a full-time win — closing strength.

83%5/6
33%1/3
Trailed at HT → Recovered35%

Of matches trailing at HT, share rescued to a draw or win — comeback resilience.

36%4/11

Goal Timing

Goal Timingwhen goals happen
events 28/2827/272827
9%
0-15'15%

Hot starts — share of the team's goals scored in the opening 15 minutes.

20%
17%
16-30'13%

Early control — share scored between the 16th and 30th minute.

10%
19%
31-45'17%

Pre-HT push — share scored in the run-up to halftime.

15%
22%
46-60'15%

Restart wave — share scored in the first 15 minutes after HT.

8%
22%
61-75'22%

Game-state shift — share scored between minutes 61 and 75.

23%
11%
76-90+'18%

Late-game finishers — share scored from the 76th minute onwards (incl. stoppage time).

25%

First-Goal Edge

First-Goal Edgewho strikes first
events 28/2827/272827
54%14/26
Scored First53%

Share of matches where the team opened the scoring — fast-start signal.

52%13/25
46%12/26
Conceded First

Share of matches where the team conceded the opening goal (lower is better).

48%12/25
71%10/14
Win when Scoring First59%

Of matches the team scored first, share converted into a win — closing strength after the opener.

46%6/13
25%3/12
Win when Conceding First21%

Of matches conceding first, share rescued into a win — comeback strength.

17%2/12
29'
Avg Min. 1st Goal Scored

Average minute of the team's first goal — earlier means faster starters.

26'
31'
Avg Min. 1st Goal Conceded

Average minute of the first goal conceded — later is better (defense holds longer).

26'

Late-Game Strength

Late-Game Strengthafter the 75th minute
events 28/2827/272827
21%6/28
Scored after 75'27%

Share of matches with a late goal scored by the team — late finishers signal.

33%9/27
25%7/28
Conceded after 75'

Share of matches the team conceded a late goal — late-game vulnerability (lower is better).

33%9/27
76%13/17
Lead Saved after 75'69%

Of matches leading at 75', share closed out for a win — closing strength.

63%5/8
24%4/17
Lead Lost after 75'

Of matches leading at 75', share dropped to a draw or loss — late-game collapse risk.

38%3/8
11%3/28
Any Goal in Stoppage Time

Share of matches with any goal in stoppage time (90+) — late-drama frequency.

11%3/27

Set Pieces

Set Piecespenalty / own-goal share
events 28/2827/272827
85%46/54
Open-Play Share89%

Of the team's scored goals, share from open play — non-set-piece scoring quality.

93%37/40
13%7/54
Penalty Share

Of the team's scored goals, share from penalty kicks — penalty dependency.

3%1/40
2%1/54
Opp Own-Goal Bonus

Of the team's scored goals, share that were opponent own-goals — pressure / fortune.

5%2/40
4%1/28
Penalty Conceded Share

Of conceded goals, share from opponent penalties — defensive discipline (lower is better).

7%3/44
0%0/28
Own-Goal Cost

Of conceded goals, share that were the team's own goals — pressure-induced errors (lower is better).

0%0/44

Corners

Cornersset-piece pressure
2827
5.86
Avg Corners For

Average corners won per match — attacking territorial pressure (> 5.5 is heavy).

4.52
4.43
Avg Corners Against

Average corners conceded per match — territorial pressure faced (lower is better).

4.59
57%
Corner Share53%

Share of total corners in the team's matches that went to the team — territorial dominance ratio.

50%
1.60
EWMACorners Diff

Smoothed corner differential per match — long-term territorial advantage (±2 is strong).

-0.82
71%20/28
Match Corners > 8.563%

Share of matches with total corners > 8.5 (Over 8.5 line) — high-tempo encounter signal.

56%15/27
54%15/28
Match Corners > 9.547%

Share of matches with total corners > 9.5 (Over 9.5 line).

41%11/27
43%12/28
Match Corners > 10.536%

Share of matches with total corners > 10.5 (Over 10.5 line) — corner-heavy clashes only.

30%8/27

Cards & Discipline

Cards & Disciplineyellows, reds & fouls
events 28/2827/272827
2.82
Avg Yellow Cards

Yellow cards picked up per match — discipline signal (lower is better).

2.56
14%4/28
Red Card Match Rate

Share of matches with at least one red card to the team — sending-off risk.

22%6/27
15.68
Avg Fouls

Fouls committed per match — aggression / tactical-foul tendency (lower is calmer).

13.19
100%27/27
Match Cards > 3.592%

Share of matches with total card points (both teams, yellow=1 / red=2, 2Y→R counted as 2) > 3.5 — Over 3.5 line.

84%21/25
27/2825/27
85%23/27
Match Cards > 4.573%

Share of matches with total card points > 4.5 — Over 4.5 line.

60%15/25
27/2825/27
66%
Cards in 2nd Half

Share of card events that occur after halftime — late-discipline tendency.

63%

Venue Edge

Venue EdgeEisden at home · Eupen on the road
1413
1.79
PPG at Venue

Points per match at the venue — home team at home, away team away.

1.00
50%7/14
Win Rate37%

Share of sampled matches won.

23%3/13
21%3/14
Loss Rate

Share of sampled matches lost (lower is better).

46%6/13
2.21
Avg Goals Scored

Goals scored per match across the sampled games.

1.31
1.21
Avg Goals Conceded

Goals conceded per match (lower is better).

1.54
21%3/14
Clean Sheet26%

Share of matches with no goals conceded.

31%4/13
71%10/14
BTTS59%

Share of matches where both teams scored.

46%6/13
64%9/14
Over 2.567%

Share of venue matches with total goals > 2.5.

69%9/13
2.35
EWMAAttack xG (EWMA)

Smoothed xG created at venue — long-term attacking strength in this fixture's venue context.

1.33
1.55
EWMADefense xG (EWMA)

Smoothed xG conceded at venue — defensive strength in this fixture's venue context (lower is better).

1.95