Challenger Pro League·
Regular Season - 19·01/25/2025·14:00
Zulte Waregem
Zulte Waregem
DWWWW
3-2
Finished
HT0-2
AS Eupen
AS Eupen
LLLLW
📍 Elindus Arena, Waregem
Season statsChallenger Pro League
Waregem18matchesEupen16matches

Every panel below reflects each team's matches in Challenger Pro League.

Coverage varies by leaguetop-tier competitions have richer per-match data; lower divisions and smaller leagues track fewer metrics, so some panels may be sparse or missing entirely.
Pre-match snapshotevery value reflects each team's state going into kick-off — frozen before the match starts, not updated live.

Overall

Overallteam-strength snapshot
75%
Overall

Composite team strength — average of LTQ and Hype.

28%
1646
ELO

Chess-style strength rating going into kick-off.

1413
75%
LTQ

Long-term quality across all competitions.

37%
74%
Hype

Short-term fixture buzz / excitement signal.

20%
3.71
Momentum

Recent goal-scoring trend (weighted goals signal).

3.14

Match Outcome

Match Outcomeresults breakdown
1816
2.33
Points per Game

Average points per match across the sampled games (max 3).

0.94
72%
Win Rate

Share of sampled matches won.

25%
17%
Draw Rate

Share of sampled matches that ended level.

19%
11%
Loss Rate

Share of sampled matches lost (lower is better).

56%
22%
Clean Sheet17%

Share of matches with no goals conceded.

13%
6%
Failed to Score

Share of matches where the team didn't score (lower is better).

31%

Goal Scoring

Goal Scoringattacking output
1816
2.28
Avg Goals Scored

Goals scored per match across the sampled games.

1.50
94%
Scored > 0.582%

Share of matches where the team scored at least once.

69%
83%
Over 1.582%

Share of matches with total goals > 1.5.

81%
78%
Over 2.576%

Share of matches with total goals > 2.5.

75%
50%
Over 3.550%

Share of matches with total goals > 3.5 — high-scoring affairs.

50%
72%
BTTS64%

Share of matches where both teams scored.

56%
50%
BTTS & Win

Share of matches won while both teams scored — strong attack with a defensive lapse.

13%
50%
Scored Both Halves41%

Share of matches with a goal in both the 1st and 2nd half.

31%

Defensive Solidity

Defensive Soliditygoals & shots conceded
1816
1.11
Avg Goals Conceded

Goals conceded per match (lower is better).

1.81
10.83
Avg Shots Conceded

Total shots faced per match — defensive pressure (> 17.5/match is heavy siege).

14.25
3.94
Avg SoT Conceded

Shots on target faced per match — quality of chances given up (> 5.5 is severe).

5.38
2.83
Avg Saves

Goalkeeper saves per match (> 4.5 means the keeper is doing heavy lifting).

3.50
72%
Save %68%

Share of opponent shots on target stopped by the keeper.

65%
22%
Clean Sheet17%

Share of matches with no goals conceded.

13%

xG Trends

xG TrendsEWMA-smoothed performance
1816
2.63
EWMAxG For

Smoothed expected goals created per match — top attacks hit > 2.5/match, mid-table sits around 1.4.

1.53
1.55
EWMAxG Against

Smoothed expected goals conceded per match — elite defenses < 1.0, struggling sides > 2.0.

2.21
1.08
EWMAxG Diff

Net xG: attack minus defense. ±1 is dominant/poor; ±2 is title-contender or crisis-level.

-0.68
-0.49
EWMAFinishing Edge

Goals scored minus xG. +0.3 is clinical, −0.3 is wasteful; ±1 is statistical outlier.

-0.29
0.18
EWMAxG per Shot

Average chance quality per attempt — 0.10 is mid, 0.15+ means the team only shoots from dangerous spots.

0.15

Shots Quality

Shots Qualityvolume & accuracy
1816
13.72
Avg Shots

Total shots per match — pure attacking volume (> 16.5/match is elite).

10.50
5.28
Avg Shots on Target

Shots on target per match — strikes the keeper had to handle (> 5.5/match is heavy).

4.38
8.28
Avg Shots in Box

Shots taken from inside the penalty area — proximity to goal (> 8.5/match means consistent box presence).

7.56
60%
Box Shot %66%

Share of shots taken from inside the box — chance-selection quality. Mid sits ~60%, elite > 75%.

72%
38%
On-Target %40%

Share of shots that hit the target — striking accuracy. Mid ~33%, elite > 40%.

42%
17%
Shot Conversion15%

Goals per shot taken — clinical efficiency. ~10% is league average, > 15% is elite finishing.

14%

Possession & Passing

Possession & Passingball control
1816
54%
Avg Possession

Share of match time with the ball. > 55% is dominant, < 40% is reactive.

54%
82%
Pass Accuracy

Share of passes completed — distribution quality. Mid sits ~80%, elite > 88%.

77%
470.72
Avg Passes

Total passes attempted per match — distribution volume. Top sides > 550, bottom sides < 400.

430.38
0.07
EWMAPossession Trend

Smoothed possession differential — team minus opponent. ±0.1 is normal, ±0.2 is strong dominance.

0.04

HT / FT Patterns

HT / FT Patternshalf-time vs full-time outcomes
1816
44%8/18
Leading at HT28%

Share of matches the team led at halftime — fast-start signal.

13%2/16
44%8/18
Level at HT

Share of matches level at halftime — balanced or low-tempo openings.

38%6/16
11%2/18
Trailing at HT

Share of matches the team trailed at halftime — slow starts (lower is better).

50%8/16
67%12/18
HT/FT Same Outcome58%

Share of matches where the W/D/L state at halftime matched the full-time result — game-state stability.

50%8/16
100%8/8
Led at HT → Won100%

Of matches led at HT, share converted into a full-time win — closing strength.

100%2/2
50%1/2
Trailed at HT → Recovered44%

Of matches trailing at HT, share rescued to a draw or win — comeback resilience.

38%3/8

Goal Timing

Goal Timingwhen goals happen
events 18/1816/161816
10%
0-15'15%

Hot starts — share of the team's goals scored in the opening 15 minutes.

19%
15%
16-30'11%

Early control — share scored between the 16th and 30th minute.

8%
20%
31-45'16%

Pre-HT push — share scored in the run-up to halftime.

12%
23%
46-60'15%

Restart wave — share scored in the first 15 minutes after HT.

8%
15%
61-75'23%

Game-state shift — share scored between minutes 61 and 75.

31%
18%
76-90+'20%

Late-game finishers — share scored from the 76th minute onwards (incl. stoppage time).

23%

First-Goal Edge

First-Goal Edgewho strikes first
events 18/1816/161816
72%13/18
Scored First61%

Share of matches where the team opened the scoring — fast-start signal.

50%8/16
28%5/18
Conceded First

Share of matches where the team conceded the opening goal (lower is better).

50%8/16
77%10/13
Win when Scoring First51%

Of matches the team scored first, share converted into a win — closing strength after the opener.

25%2/8
60%3/5
Win when Conceding First43%

Of matches conceding first, share rescued into a win — comeback strength.

25%2/8
29'
Avg Min. 1st Goal Scored

Average minute of the team's first goal — earlier means faster starters.

29'
21'
Avg Min. 1st Goal Conceded

Average minute of the first goal conceded — later is better (defense holds longer).

26'

Late-Game Strength

Late-Game Strengthafter the 75th minute
events 18/1816/161816
33%6/18
Scored after 75'32%

Share of matches with a late goal scored by the team — late finishers signal.

31%5/16
28%5/18
Conceded after 75'

Share of matches the team conceded a late goal — late-game vulnerability (lower is better).

25%4/16
92%11/12
Lead Saved after 75'71%

Of matches leading at 75', share closed out for a win — closing strength.

50%3/6
8%1/12
Lead Lost after 75'

Of matches leading at 75', share dropped to a draw or loss — late-game collapse risk.

50%3/6
22%4/18
Any Goal in Stoppage Time

Share of matches with any goal in stoppage time (90+) — late-drama frequency.

19%3/16

Set Pieces

Set Piecespenalty / own-goal share
events 18/1816/161816
95%38/40
Open-Play Share92%

Of the team's scored goals, share from open play — non-set-piece scoring quality.

88%23/26
5%2/40
Penalty Share

Of the team's scored goals, share from penalty kicks — penalty dependency.

4%1/26
0%0/40
Opp Own-Goal Bonus

Of the team's scored goals, share that were opponent own-goals — pressure / fortune.

8%2/26
5%1/21
Penalty Conceded Share

Of conceded goals, share from opponent penalties — defensive discipline (lower is better).

4%1/27
5%1/21
Own-Goal Cost

Of conceded goals, share that were the team's own goals — pressure-induced errors (lower is better).

0%0/27

Corners

Cornersset-piece pressure
1816
5.11
Avg Corners For

Average corners won per match — attacking territorial pressure (> 5.5 is heavy).

4.63
4.89
Avg Corners Against

Average corners conceded per match — territorial pressure faced (lower is better).

3.75
51%
Corner Share53%

Share of total corners in the team's matches that went to the team — territorial dominance ratio.

55%
0.11
EWMACorners Diff

Smoothed corner differential per match — long-term territorial advantage (±2 is strong).

0.28
78%14/18
Match Corners > 8.564%

Share of matches with total corners > 8.5 (Over 8.5 line) — high-tempo encounter signal.

50%8/16
61%11/18
Match Corners > 9.543%

Share of matches with total corners > 9.5 (Over 9.5 line).

25%4/16
39%7/18
Match Corners > 10.529%

Share of matches with total corners > 10.5 (Over 10.5 line) — corner-heavy clashes only.

19%3/16

Cards & Discipline

Cards & Disciplineyellows, reds & fouls
events 18/1816/161816
2.22
Avg Yellow Cards

Yellow cards picked up per match — discipline signal (lower is better).

2.63
6%1/18
Red Card Match Rate

Share of matches with at least one red card to the team — sending-off risk.

19%3/16
10.83
Avg Fouls

Fouls committed per match — aggression / tactical-foul tendency (lower is calmer).

14.88
81%13/16
Match Cards > 3.581%

Share of matches with total card points (both teams, yellow=1 / red=2, 2Y→R counted as 2) > 3.5 — Over 3.5 line.

80%12/15
16/1815/16
75%12/16
Match Cards > 4.568%

Share of matches with total card points > 4.5 — Over 4.5 line.

60%9/15
16/1815/16
67%
Cards in 2nd Half

Share of card events that occur after halftime — late-discipline tendency.

59%

Venue Edge

Venue EdgeWaregem at home · Eupen on the road
98
2.44
PPG at Venue

Points per match at the venue — home team at home, away team away.

1.38
78%7/9
Win Rate58%

Share of sampled matches won.

38%3/8
11%1/9
Loss Rate

Share of sampled matches lost (lower is better).

38%3/8
2.44
Avg Goals Scored

Goals scored per match across the sampled games.

1.88
1.00
Avg Goals Conceded

Goals conceded per match (lower is better).

1.50
22%2/9
Clean Sheet24%

Share of matches with no goals conceded.

25%2/8
67%6/9
BTTS65%

Share of matches where both teams scored.

63%5/8
78%7/9
Over 2.583%

Share of venue matches with total goals > 2.5.

88%7/8
2.75
EWMAAttack xG (EWMA)

Smoothed xG created at venue — long-term attacking strength in this fixture's venue context.

2.05
1.26
EWMADefense xG (EWMA)

Smoothed xG conceded at venue — defensive strength in this fixture's venue context (lower is better).

1.89