Challenger Pro League·
Regular Season - 11·11/10/2024·13:15
AS Eupen
AS Eupen
DLLDW
0-4
Finished
HT0-1
Patro Eisden
Patro Eisden
DWDLW
📍 Kehrwegstadion, Eupen
Season statsChallenger Pro League
Eupen10matchesEisden10matches

Every panel below reflects each team's matches in Challenger Pro League.

Coverage varies by leaguetop-tier competitions have richer per-match data; lower divisions and smaller leagues track fewer metrics, so some panels may be sparse or missing entirely.
Pre-match snapshotevery value reflects each team's state going into kick-off — frozen before the match starts, not updated live.

Overall

Overallteam-strength snapshot
43%
Overall

Composite team strength — average of LTQ and Hype.

66%
1392
ELO

Chess-style strength rating going into kick-off.

1522
46%
LTQ

Long-term quality across all competitions.

66%
40%
Hype

Short-term fixture buzz / excitement signal.

65%
2.99
Momentum

Recent goal-scoring trend (weighted goals signal).

3.12

Match Outcome

Match Outcomeresults breakdown
1010
1.20
Points per Game

Average points per match across the sampled games (max 3).

1.70
30%
Win Rate

Share of sampled matches won.

40%
30%
Draw Rate

Share of sampled matches that ended level.

50%
40%
Loss Rate

Share of sampled matches lost (lower is better).

10%
10%
Clean Sheet15%

Share of matches with no goals conceded.

20%
20%
Failed to Score

Share of matches where the team didn't score (lower is better).

20%

Goal Scoring

Goal Scoringattacking output
1010
1.50
Avg Goals Scored

Goals scored per match across the sampled games.

2.00
80%
Scored > 0.580%

Share of matches where the team scored at least once.

80%
90%
Over 1.585%

Share of matches with total goals > 1.5.

80%
80%
Over 2.570%

Share of matches with total goals > 2.5.

60%
40%
Over 3.550%

Share of matches with total goals > 3.5 — high-scoring affairs.

60%
70%
BTTS70%

Share of matches where both teams scored.

70%
20%
BTTS & Win

Share of matches won while both teams scored — strong attack with a defensive lapse.

30%
20%
Scored Both Halves35%

Share of matches with a goal in both the 1st and 2nd half.

50%

Defensive Solidity

Defensive Soliditygoals & shots conceded
1010
1.60
Avg Goals Conceded

Goals conceded per match (lower is better).

1.20
14.50
Avg Shots Conceded

Total shots faced per match — defensive pressure (> 17.5/match is heavy siege).

10.00
4.60
Avg SoT Conceded

Shots on target faced per match — quality of chances given up (> 5.5 is severe).

3.80
2.80
Avg Saves

Goalkeeper saves per match (> 4.5 means the keeper is doing heavy lifting).

2.30
61%
Save %61%

Share of opponent shots on target stopped by the keeper.

61%
10%
Clean Sheet15%

Share of matches with no goals conceded.

20%

xG Trends

xG TrendsEWMA-smoothed performance
1010
1.40
EWMAxG For

Smoothed expected goals created per match — top attacks hit > 2.5/match, mid-table sits around 1.4.

2.30
1.97
EWMAxG Against

Smoothed expected goals conceded per match — elite defenses < 1.0, struggling sides > 2.0.

1.36
-0.57
EWMAxG Diff

Net xG: attack minus defense. ±1 is dominant/poor; ±2 is title-contender or crisis-level.

0.94
-0.31
EWMAFinishing Edge

Goals scored minus xG. +0.3 is clinical, −0.3 is wasteful; ±1 is statistical outlier.

-0.45
0.14
EWMAxG per Shot

Average chance quality per attempt — 0.10 is mid, 0.15+ means the team only shoots from dangerous spots.

0.15

Shots Quality

Shots Qualityvolume & accuracy
1010
10.50
Avg Shots

Total shots per match — pure attacking volume (> 16.5/match is elite).

16.40
4.50
Avg Shots on Target

Shots on target per match — strikes the keeper had to handle (> 5.5/match is heavy).

6.20
7.70
Avg Shots in Box

Shots taken from inside the penalty area — proximity to goal (> 8.5/match means consistent box presence).

10.90
73%
Box Shot %70%

Share of shots taken from inside the box — chance-selection quality. Mid sits ~60%, elite > 75%.

66%
43%
On-Target %40%

Share of shots that hit the target — striking accuracy. Mid ~33%, elite > 40%.

38%
14%
Shot Conversion13%

Goals per shot taken — clinical efficiency. ~10% is league average, > 15% is elite finishing.

12%

Possession & Passing

Possession & Passingball control
1010
53%
Avg Possession

Share of match time with the ball. > 55% is dominant, < 40% is reactive.

38%
79%
Pass Accuracy

Share of passes completed — distribution quality. Mid sits ~80%, elite > 88%.

67%
438.20
Avg Passes

Total passes attempted per match — distribution volume. Top sides > 550, bottom sides < 400.

276.90
-0.01
EWMAPossession Trend

Smoothed possession differential — team minus opponent. ±0.1 is normal, ±0.2 is strong dominance.

-0.20

HT / FT Patterns

HT / FT Patternshalf-time vs full-time outcomes
1010
10%1/10
Leading at HT30%

Share of matches the team led at halftime — fast-start signal.

50%5/10
50%5/10
Level at HT

Share of matches level at halftime — balanced or low-tempo openings.

30%3/10
40%4/10
Trailing at HT

Share of matches the team trailed at halftime — slow starts (lower is better).

20%2/10
30%3/10
HT/FT Same Outcome55%

Share of matches where the W/D/L state at halftime matched the full-time result — game-state stability.

80%8/10
100%1/1
Led at HT → Won90%

Of matches led at HT, share converted into a full-time win — closing strength.

80%4/5
75%3/4
Trailed at HT → Recovered63%

Of matches trailing at HT, share rescued to a draw or win — comeback resilience.

50%1/2

Goal Timing

Goal Timingwhen goals happen
events 10/1010/101010
13%
0-15'14%

Hot starts — share of the team's goals scored in the opening 15 minutes.

15%
6%
16-30'16%

Early control — share scored between the 16th and 30th minute.

25%
13%
31-45'14%

Pre-HT push — share scored in the run-up to halftime.

15%
13%
46-60'19%

Restart wave — share scored in the first 15 minutes after HT.

25%
38%
61-75'24%

Game-state shift — share scored between minutes 61 and 75.

10%
19%
76-90+'14%

Late-game finishers — share scored from the 76th minute onwards (incl. stoppage time).

10%

First-Goal Edge

First-Goal Edgewho strikes first
events 10/1010/101010
50%5/10
Scored First53%

Share of matches where the team opened the scoring — fast-start signal.

56%5/9
50%5/10
Conceded First

Share of matches where the team conceded the opening goal (lower is better).

44%4/9
20%1/5
Win when Scoring First50%

Of matches the team scored first, share converted into a win — closing strength after the opener.

80%4/5
40%2/5
Win when Conceding First20%

Of matches conceding first, share rescued into a win — comeback strength.

0%0/4
38'
Avg Min. 1st Goal Scored

Average minute of the team's first goal — earlier means faster starters.

16'
27'
Avg Min. 1st Goal Conceded

Average minute of the first goal conceded — later is better (defense holds longer).

20'

Late-Game Strength

Late-Game Strengthafter the 75th minute
events 10/1010/101010
30%3/10
Scored after 75'25%

Share of matches with a late goal scored by the team — late finishers signal.

20%2/10
30%3/10
Conceded after 75'

Share of matches the team conceded a late goal — late-game vulnerability (lower is better).

30%3/10
50%2/4
Lead Saved after 75'65%

Of matches leading at 75', share closed out for a win — closing strength.

80%4/5
50%2/4
Lead Lost after 75'

Of matches leading at 75', share dropped to a draw or loss — late-game collapse risk.

20%1/5
10%1/10
Any Goal in Stoppage Time

Share of matches with any goal in stoppage time (90+) — late-drama frequency.

0%0/10

Set Pieces

Set Piecespenalty / own-goal share
events 10/1010/101010
88%14/16
Open-Play Share81%

Of the team's scored goals, share from open play — non-set-piece scoring quality.

75%15/20
6%1/16
Penalty Share

Of the team's scored goals, share from penalty kicks — penalty dependency.

25%5/20
6%1/16
Opp Own-Goal Bonus

Of the team's scored goals, share that were opponent own-goals — pressure / fortune.

0%0/20
0%0/15
Penalty Conceded Share

Of conceded goals, share from opponent penalties — defensive discipline (lower is better).

0%0/12
0%0/15
Own-Goal Cost

Of conceded goals, share that were the team's own goals — pressure-induced errors (lower is better).

0%0/12

Corners

Cornersset-piece pressure
1010
4.20
Avg Corners For

Average corners won per match — attacking territorial pressure (> 5.5 is heavy).

6.60
3.70
Avg Corners Against

Average corners conceded per match — territorial pressure faced (lower is better).

4.30
53%
Corner Share57%

Share of total corners in the team's matches that went to the team — territorial dominance ratio.

61%
-0.59
EWMACorners Diff

Smoothed corner differential per match — long-term territorial advantage (±2 is strong).

2.15
40%4/10
Match Corners > 8.565%

Share of matches with total corners > 8.5 (Over 8.5 line) — high-tempo encounter signal.

90%9/10
30%3/10
Match Corners > 9.555%

Share of matches with total corners > 9.5 (Over 9.5 line).

80%8/10
20%2/10
Match Corners > 10.535%

Share of matches with total corners > 10.5 (Over 10.5 line) — corner-heavy clashes only.

50%5/10

Cards & Discipline

Cards & Disciplineyellows, reds & fouls
events 10/1010/101010
2.30
Avg Yellow Cards

Yellow cards picked up per match — discipline signal (lower is better).

2.90
10%1/10
Red Card Match Rate

Share of matches with at least one red card to the team — sending-off risk.

0%0/10
15.20
Avg Fouls

Fouls committed per match — aggression / tactical-foul tendency (lower is calmer).

16.00
78%7/9
Match Cards > 3.584%

Share of matches with total card points (both teams, yellow=1 / red=2, 2Y→R counted as 2) > 3.5 — Over 3.5 line.

90%9/10
9/10
44%4/9
Match Cards > 4.567%

Share of matches with total card points > 4.5 — Over 4.5 line.

90%9/10
9/10
55%
Cards in 2nd Half

Share of card events that occur after halftime — late-discipline tendency.

72%

Venue Edge

Venue EdgeEupen at home · Eisden on the road
44
1.00
PPG at Venue

Points per match at the venue — home team at home, away team away.

1.50
25%1/4
Win Rate25%

Share of sampled matches won.

25%1/4
50%2/4
Loss Rate

Share of sampled matches lost (lower is better).

0%0/4
1.50
Avg Goals Scored

Goals scored per match across the sampled games.

1.25
1.75
Avg Goals Conceded

Goals conceded per match (lower is better).

0.75
0%0/4
Clean Sheet25%

Share of matches with no goals conceded.

50%2/4
75%3/4
BTTS63%

Share of matches where both teams scored.

50%2/4
75%3/4
Over 2.550%

Share of venue matches with total goals > 2.5.

25%1/4
1.07
EWMAAttack xG (EWMA)

Smoothed xG created at venue — long-term attacking strength in this fixture's venue context.

1.03
1.86
EWMADefense xG (EWMA)

Smoothed xG conceded at venue — defensive strength in this fixture's venue context (lower is better).

0.86