NM Cupen·
1st Round·04/10/2024·12:00
Nardo
Nardo
WLLLL
2-4
Finished
HT1-2
Strindheim
Strindheim
WWWLL
📍 Nissekollen Kunstgress, Trondheim
Last 10NM Cupen
Nardo10matchesStrindheim10matches

Not in either team's main domestic league — every panel below reflects each team's most recent matches across all competitions.

Coverage varies by leaguetop-tier competitions have richer per-match data; lower divisions and smaller leagues track fewer metrics, so some panels may be sparse or missing entirely.
Pre-match snapshotevery value reflects each team's state going into kick-off — frozen before the match starts, not updated live.

Overall

Overallteam-strength snapshot
1333
ELO

Chess-style strength rating going into kick-off.

1377

Match Outcome

Match Outcomeresults breakdown
1010
1.80
Points per Game

Average points per match across the sampled games (max 3).

1.60
60%
Win Rate

Share of sampled matches won.

50%
0%
Draw Rate

Share of sampled matches that ended level.

10%
40%
Loss Rate

Share of sampled matches lost (lower is better).

40%
30%
Clean Sheet30%

Share of matches with no goals conceded.

30%
40%
Failed to Score

Share of matches where the team didn't score (lower is better).

10%

Goal Scoring

Goal Scoringattacking output
1010
2.40
Avg Goals Scored

Goals scored per match across the sampled games.

2.70
60%
Scored > 0.575%

Share of matches where the team scored at least once.

90%
90%
Over 1.590%

Share of matches with total goals > 1.5.

90%
80%
Over 2.585%

Share of matches with total goals > 2.5.

90%
50%
Over 3.550%

Share of matches with total goals > 3.5 — high-scoring affairs.

50%
30%
BTTS50%

Share of matches where both teams scored.

70%
30%
BTTS & Win

Share of matches won while both teams scored — strong attack with a defensive lapse.

30%
63%
Scored Both Halves56%

Share of matches with a goal in both the 1st and 2nd half.

50%

Defensive Solidity

Defensive Soliditygoals & shots conceded
1010
1.70
Avg Goals Conceded

Goals conceded per match (lower is better).

1.50
30%
Clean Sheet30%

Share of matches with no goals conceded.

30%

xG Trends

xG TrendsEWMA-smoothed performance
1010
2.11
EWMAxG For

Smoothed expected goals created per match — top attacks hit > 2.5/match, mid-table sits around 1.4.

1.92
0.52
EWMAxG Against

Smoothed expected goals conceded per match — elite defenses < 1.0, struggling sides > 2.0.

0.67
1.58
EWMAxG Diff

Net xG: attack minus defense. ±1 is dominant/poor; ±2 is title-contender or crisis-level.

1.25
1.24
EWMAFinishing Edge

Goals scored minus xG. +0.3 is clinical, −0.3 is wasteful; ±1 is statistical outlier.

1.03

HT / FT Patterns

HT / FT Patternshalf-time vs full-time outcomes
1010
63%5/8
Leading at HT56%

Share of matches the team led at halftime — fast-start signal.

50%4/8
25%2/8
Level at HT

Share of matches level at halftime — balanced or low-tempo openings.

25%2/8
13%1/8
Trailing at HT

Share of matches the team trailed at halftime — slow starts (lower is better).

25%2/8
75%6/8
HT/FT Same Outcome81%

Share of matches where the W/D/L state at halftime matched the full-time result — game-state stability.

88%7/8
100%5/5
Led at HT → Won100%

Of matches led at HT, share converted into a full-time win — closing strength.

100%4/4
0%0/1
Trailed at HT → Recovered0%

Of matches trailing at HT, share rescued to a draw or win — comeback resilience.

0%0/2

Goal Timing

Goal Timingwhen goals happen
events 7/108/101010
4%
0-15'9%

Hot starts — share of the team's goals scored in the opening 15 minutes.

14%
20%
16-30'10%

Early control — share scored between the 16th and 30th minute.

0%
12%
31-45'20%

Pre-HT push — share scored in the run-up to halftime.

27%
20%
46-60'17%

Restart wave — share scored in the first 15 minutes after HT.

14%
12%
61-75'11%

Game-state shift — share scored between minutes 61 and 75.

9%
32%
76-90+'34%

Late-game finishers — share scored from the 76th minute onwards (incl. stoppage time).

36%

First-Goal Edge

First-Goal Edgewho strikes first
events 7/108/101010
71%5/7
Scored First71%

Share of matches where the team opened the scoring — fast-start signal.

71%5/7
29%2/7
Conceded First

Share of matches where the team conceded the opening goal (lower is better).

29%2/7
100%5/5
Win when Scoring First90%

Of matches the team scored first, share converted into a win — closing strength after the opener.

80%4/5
50%1/2
Win when Conceding First25%

Of matches conceding first, share rescued into a win — comeback strength.

0%0/2
25'
Avg Min. 1st Goal Scored

Average minute of the team's first goal — earlier means faster starters.

21'
41'
Avg Min. 1st Goal Conceded

Average minute of the first goal conceded — later is better (defense holds longer).

45'

Late-Game Strength

Late-Game Strengthafter the 75th minute
events 7/108/101010
86%6/7
Scored after 75'80%

Share of matches with a late goal scored by the team — late finishers signal.

75%6/8
43%3/7
Conceded after 75'

Share of matches the team conceded a late goal — late-game vulnerability (lower is better).

38%3/8
100%5/5
Lead Saved after 75'100%

Of matches leading at 75', share closed out for a win — closing strength.

100%4/4
0%0/5
Lead Lost after 75'

Of matches leading at 75', share dropped to a draw or loss — late-game collapse risk.

0%0/4
0%0/7
Any Goal in Stoppage Time

Share of matches with any goal in stoppage time (90+) — late-drama frequency.

13%1/8

Set Pieces

Set Piecespenalty / own-goal share
events 7/108/101010
92%23/25
Open-Play Share94%

Of the team's scored goals, share from open play — non-set-piece scoring quality.

95%21/22
4%1/25
Penalty Share

Of the team's scored goals, share from penalty kicks — penalty dependency.

5%1/22
4%1/25
Opp Own-Goal Bonus

Of the team's scored goals, share that were opponent own-goals — pressure / fortune.

0%0/22
0%0/5
Penalty Conceded Share

Of conceded goals, share from opponent penalties — defensive discipline (lower is better).

0%0/12
0%0/5
Own-Goal Cost

Of conceded goals, share that were the team's own goals — pressure-induced errors (lower is better).

0%0/12

Cards & Discipline

Cards & Disciplineyellows, reds & fouls
events 7/108/101010
100%1/1
Match Cards > 3.5100%

Share of matches with total card points (both teams, yellow=1 / red=2, 2Y→R counted as 2) > 3.5 — Over 3.5 line.

100%2/2
1/102/10
100%1/1
Match Cards > 4.550%

Share of matches with total card points > 4.5 — Over 4.5 line.

0%0/2
1/102/10
86%
Cards in 2nd Half

Share of card events that occur after halftime — late-discipline tendency.

86%

Venue Edge

Venue EdgeNardo at home · Strindheim on the road
45
3.00
PPG at Venue

Points per match at the venue — home team at home, away team away.

1.80
100%4/4
Win Rate80%

Share of sampled matches won.

60%3/5
0%0/4
Loss Rate

Share of sampled matches lost (lower is better).

40%2/5
5.00
Avg Goals Scored

Goals scored per match across the sampled games.

2.60
0.50
Avg Goals Conceded

Goals conceded per match (lower is better).

1.60
75%3/4
Clean Sheet48%

Share of matches with no goals conceded.

20%1/5
25%1/4
BTTS53%

Share of matches where both teams scored.

80%4/5
100%4/4
Over 2.5100%

Share of venue matches with total goals > 2.5.

100%5/5
2.70
EWMAAttack xG (EWMA)

Smoothed xG created at venue — long-term attacking strength in this fixture's venue context.

2.17
0.41
EWMADefense xG (EWMA)

Smoothed xG conceded at venue — defensive strength in this fixture's venue context (lower is better).

0.82