Liga Profesional Argentina·
2nd Phase - 13·08/30/2024·18:00
Sarmiento Junin
Sarmiento Junin
LDDDL
0-0
Finished
HT0-0
Lanus
Lanus
DWDWL
📍 Estadio Eva Perón de Junín, Junín, Provincia de Buenos Aires
Season statsLiga Profesional Argentina
Junin12matchesLanus12matches

Every panel below reflects each team's matches in Liga Profesional Argentina.

Coverage varies by leaguetop-tier competitions have richer per-match data; lower divisions and smaller leagues track fewer metrics, so some panels may be sparse or missing entirely.
Pre-match snapshotevery value reflects each team's state going into kick-off — frozen before the match starts, not updated live.

Overall

Overallteam-strength snapshot
48%
Overall

Composite team strength — average of LTQ and Hype.

59%
1525
ELO

Chess-style strength rating going into kick-off.

1614
48%
LTQ

Long-term quality across all competitions.

61%
48%
Hype

Short-term fixture buzz / excitement signal.

57%
0.99
Momentum

Recent goal-scoring trend (weighted goals signal).

3.16

Match Outcome

Match Outcomeresults breakdown
1212
1.08
Points per Game

Average points per match across the sampled games (max 3).

1.42
25%
Win Rate

Share of sampled matches won.

33%
33%
Draw Rate

Share of sampled matches that ended level.

42%
42%
Loss Rate

Share of sampled matches lost (lower is better).

25%
50%
Clean Sheet29%

Share of matches with no goals conceded.

8%
42%
Failed to Score

Share of matches where the team didn't score (lower is better).

17%

Goal Scoring

Goal Scoringattacking output
1212
0.75
Avg Goals Scored

Goals scored per match across the sampled games.

1.42
58%
Scored > 0.571%

Share of matches where the team scored at least once.

83%
42%
Over 1.571%

Share of matches with total goals > 1.5.

100%
25%
Over 2.533%

Share of matches with total goals > 2.5.

42%
8%
Over 3.521%

Share of matches with total goals > 3.5 — high-scoring affairs.

33%
33%
BTTS54%

Share of matches where both teams scored.

75%
0%
BTTS & Win

Share of matches won while both teams scored — strong attack with a defensive lapse.

25%
0%
Scored Both Halves8%

Share of matches with a goal in both the 1st and 2nd half.

17%

Defensive Solidity

Defensive Soliditygoals & shots conceded
1212
0.92
Avg Goals Conceded

Goals conceded per match (lower is better).

1.50
16.50
Avg Shots Conceded

Total shots faced per match — defensive pressure (> 17.5/match is heavy siege).

14.92
4.50
Avg SoT Conceded

Shots on target faced per match — quality of chances given up (> 5.5 is severe).

5.67
3.25
Avg Saves

Goalkeeper saves per match (> 4.5 means the keeper is doing heavy lifting).

4.25
72%
Save %74%

Share of opponent shots on target stopped by the keeper.

75%
50%
Clean Sheet29%

Share of matches with no goals conceded.

8%

xG Trends

xG TrendsEWMA-smoothed performance
1212
0.80
EWMAxG For

Smoothed expected goals created per match — top attacks hit > 2.5/match, mid-table sits around 1.4.

1.58
1.21
EWMAxG Against

Smoothed expected goals conceded per match — elite defenses < 1.0, struggling sides > 2.0.

1.18
-0.41
EWMAxG Diff

Net xG: attack minus defense. ±1 is dominant/poor; ±2 is title-contender or crisis-level.

0.40
-0.16
EWMAFinishing Edge

Goals scored minus xG. +0.3 is clinical, −0.3 is wasteful; ±1 is statistical outlier.

0.04
0.08
EWMAxG per Shot

Average chance quality per attempt — 0.10 is mid, 0.15+ means the team only shoots from dangerous spots.

0.12

Shots Quality

Shots Qualityvolume & accuracy
1212
9.67
Avg Shots

Total shots per match — pure attacking volume (> 16.5/match is elite).

11.17
3.50
Avg Shots on Target

Shots on target per match — strikes the keeper had to handle (> 5.5/match is heavy).

4.17
6.00
Avg Shots in Box

Shots taken from inside the penalty area — proximity to goal (> 8.5/match means consistent box presence).

7.00
11/12
57%
Box Shot %60%

Share of shots taken from inside the box — chance-selection quality. Mid sits ~60%, elite > 75%.

63%
36%
On-Target %37%

Share of shots that hit the target — striking accuracy. Mid ~33%, elite > 40%.

37%
8%
Shot Conversion10%

Goals per shot taken — clinical efficiency. ~10% is league average, > 15% is elite finishing.

13%

Possession & Passing

Possession & Passingball control
1212
32%
Avg Possession

Share of match time with the ball. > 55% is dominant, < 40% is reactive.

43%
62%
Pass Accuracy

Share of passes completed — distribution quality. Mid sits ~80%, elite > 88%.

73%
210.08
Avg Passes

Total passes attempted per match — distribution volume. Top sides > 550, bottom sides < 400.

319.83
-0.29
EWMAPossession Trend

Smoothed possession differential — team minus opponent. ±0.1 is normal, ±0.2 is strong dominance.

-0.12

HT / FT Patterns

HT / FT Patternshalf-time vs full-time outcomes
1212
8%1/12
Leading at HT25%

Share of matches the team led at halftime — fast-start signal.

42%5/12
75%9/12
Level at HT

Share of matches level at halftime — balanced or low-tempo openings.

42%5/12
17%2/12
Trailing at HT

Share of matches the team trailed at halftime — slow starts (lower is better).

17%2/12
58%7/12
HT/FT Same Outcome42%

Share of matches where the W/D/L state at halftime matched the full-time result — game-state stability.

25%3/12
100%1/1
Led at HT → Won60%

Of matches led at HT, share converted into a full-time win — closing strength.

20%1/5
0%0/2
Trailed at HT → Recovered25%

Of matches trailing at HT, share rescued to a draw or win — comeback resilience.

50%1/2

Goal Timing

Goal Timingwhen goals happen
events 12/1212/121212
13%
0-15'6%

Hot starts — share of the team's goals scored in the opening 15 minutes.

0%
25%
16-30'21%

Early control — share scored between the 16th and 30th minute.

17%
0%
31-45'11%

Pre-HT push — share scored in the run-up to halftime.

22%
25%
46-60'24%

Restart wave — share scored in the first 15 minutes after HT.

22%
25%
61-75'18%

Game-state shift — share scored between minutes 61 and 75.

11%
13%
76-90+'20%

Late-game finishers — share scored from the 76th minute onwards (incl. stoppage time).

28%

First-Goal Edge

First-Goal Edgewho strikes first
events 12/1212/121212
44%4/9
Scored First60%

Share of matches where the team opened the scoring — fast-start signal.

75%9/12
56%5/9
Conceded First

Share of matches where the team conceded the opening goal (lower is better).

25%3/12
75%3/4
Win when Scoring First60%

Of matches the team scored first, share converted into a win — closing strength after the opener.

44%4/9
0%0/5
Win when Conceding First0%

Of matches conceding first, share rescued into a win — comeback strength.

0%0/3
40'
Avg Min. 1st Goal Scored

Average minute of the team's first goal — earlier means faster starters.

34'
48'
Avg Min. 1st Goal Conceded

Average minute of the first goal conceded — later is better (defense holds longer).

37'

Late-Game Strength

Late-Game Strengthafter the 75th minute
events 12/1212/121212
8%1/12
Scored after 75'25%

Share of matches with a late goal scored by the team — late finishers signal.

42%5/12
33%4/12
Conceded after 75'

Share of matches the team conceded a late goal — late-game vulnerability (lower is better).

58%7/12
100%3/3
Lead Saved after 75'75%

Of matches leading at 75', share closed out for a win — closing strength.

50%3/6
0%0/3
Lead Lost after 75'

Of matches leading at 75', share dropped to a draw or loss — late-game collapse risk.

50%3/6
0%0/12
Any Goal in Stoppage Time

Share of matches with any goal in stoppage time (90+) — late-drama frequency.

25%3/12

Set Pieces

Set Piecespenalty / own-goal share
events 12/1212/121212
88%7/8
Open-Play Share91%

Of the team's scored goals, share from open play — non-set-piece scoring quality.

94%17/18
13%1/8
Penalty Share

Of the team's scored goals, share from penalty kicks — penalty dependency.

0%0/18
0%0/8
Opp Own-Goal Bonus

Of the team's scored goals, share that were opponent own-goals — pressure / fortune.

6%1/18
0%0/12
Penalty Conceded Share

Of conceded goals, share from opponent penalties — defensive discipline (lower is better).

6%1/17
8%1/12
Own-Goal Cost

Of conceded goals, share that were the team's own goals — pressure-induced errors (lower is better).

0%0/17

Corners

Cornersset-piece pressure
1212
3.42
Avg Corners For

Average corners won per match — attacking territorial pressure (> 5.5 is heavy).

3.33
6.33
Avg Corners Against

Average corners conceded per match — territorial pressure faced (lower is better).

5.67
35%
Corner Share36%

Share of total corners in the team's matches that went to the team — territorial dominance ratio.

37%
-2.30
EWMACorners Diff

Smoothed corner differential per match — long-term territorial advantage (±2 is strong).

-2.00
67%8/12
Match Corners > 8.558%

Share of matches with total corners > 8.5 (Over 8.5 line) — high-tempo encounter signal.

50%6/12
67%8/12
Match Corners > 9.550%

Share of matches with total corners > 9.5 (Over 9.5 line).

33%4/12
33%4/12
Match Corners > 10.533%

Share of matches with total corners > 10.5 (Over 10.5 line) — corner-heavy clashes only.

33%4/12

Cards & Discipline

Cards & Disciplineyellows, reds & fouls
events 12/1212/121212
2.50
Avg Yellow Cards

Yellow cards picked up per match — discipline signal (lower is better).

2.42
8%1/12
Red Card Match Rate

Share of matches with at least one red card to the team — sending-off risk.

42%5/12
14.83
Avg Fouls

Fouls committed per match — aggression / tactical-foul tendency (lower is calmer).

12.50
80%8/10
Match Cards > 3.590%

Share of matches with total card points (both teams, yellow=1 / red=2, 2Y→R counted as 2) > 3.5 — Over 3.5 line.

100%10/10
10/1210/12
80%8/10
Match Cards > 4.580%

Share of matches with total card points > 4.5 — Over 4.5 line.

80%8/10
10/1210/12
62%
Cards in 2nd Half

Share of card events that occur after halftime — late-discipline tendency.

60%

Venue Edge

Venue EdgeJunin at home · Lanus on the road
65
1.33
PPG at Venue

Points per match at the venue — home team at home, away team away.

0.60
33%2/6
Win Rate17%

Share of sampled matches won.

0%0/5
33%2/6
Loss Rate

Share of sampled matches lost (lower is better).

40%2/5
0.67
Avg Goals Scored

Goals scored per match across the sampled games.

1.00
0.50
Avg Goals Conceded

Goals conceded per match (lower is better).

1.80
67%4/6
Clean Sheet33%

Share of matches with no goals conceded.

0%0/5
17%1/6
BTTS48%

Share of matches where both teams scored.

80%4/5
17%1/6
Over 2.528%

Share of venue matches with total goals > 2.5.

40%2/5
0.92
EWMAAttack xG (EWMA)

Smoothed xG created at venue — long-term attacking strength in this fixture's venue context.

1.36
1.05
EWMADefense xG (EWMA)

Smoothed xG conceded at venue — defensive strength in this fixture's venue context (lower is better).

1.21