Veikkausliiga·
Regular Season - 10·06/13/2026·12:00 PM
Inter Turku
Inter Turku
WDWWW
VS
AC Oulu
AC Oulu
WWWLW
Neutral📍 Veritas Stadion, Turku
Season statsVeikkausliiga
Turku11matchesOulu10matches

Every panel below reflects each team's matches in Veikkausliiga.

Coverage varies by leaguetop-tier competitions have richer per-match data; lower divisions and smaller leagues track fewer metrics, so some panels may be sparse or missing entirely.
Pre-match snapshotevery value reflects each team's state going into kick-off — frozen before the match starts, not updated live.

Overall

Overallteam-strength snapshot
80%
Overall

Composite team strength — average of LTQ and Hype.

73%
1612
ELO

Chess-style strength rating going into kick-off.

1479
76%
LTQ

Long-term quality across all competitions.

66%
84%
Hype

Short-term fixture buzz / excitement signal.

79%
3.05
Momentum

Recent goal-scoring trend (weighted goals signal).

1.85

Match Outcome

Match Outcomeresults breakdown
1110
2.18
Points per Game

Average points per match across the sampled games (max 3).

2.10
64%
Win Rate

Share of sampled matches won.

70%
27%
Draw Rate

Share of sampled matches that ended level.

0%
9%
Loss Rate

Share of sampled matches lost (lower is better).

30%
36%
Clean Sheet43%

Share of matches with no goals conceded.

50%
18%
Failed to Score

Share of matches where the team didn't score (lower is better).

10%

Goal Scoring

Goal Scoringattacking output
1110
1.55
Avg Goals Scored

Goals scored per match across the sampled games.

1.60
82%
Scored > 0.586%

Share of matches where the team scored at least once.

90%
82%
Over 1.566%

Share of matches with total goals > 1.5.

50%
36%
Over 2.538%

Share of matches with total goals > 2.5.

40%
18%
Over 3.519%

Share of matches with total goals > 3.5 — high-scoring affairs.

20%
55%
BTTS47%

Share of matches where both teams scored.

40%
36%
BTTS & Win

Share of matches won while both teams scored — strong attack with a defensive lapse.

20%
18%
Scored Both Halves24%

Share of matches with a goal in both the 1st and 2nd half.

30%

Defensive Solidity

Defensive Soliditygoals & shots conceded
1110
0.73
Avg Goals Conceded

Goals conceded per match (lower is better).

0.80
11.33
Avg Shots Conceded

Total shots faced per match — defensive pressure (> 17.5/match is heavy siege).

3/110/10
4.33
Avg SoT Conceded

Shots on target faced per match — quality of chances given up (> 5.5 is severe).

3/110/10
4.00
Avg Saves

Goalkeeper saves per match (> 4.5 means the keeper is doing heavy lifting).

3/110/10
92%
Save %

Share of opponent shots on target stopped by the keeper.

3/110/10
36%
Clean Sheet43%

Share of matches with no goals conceded.

50%

xG Trends

xG TrendsEWMA-smoothed performance
1110
1.63
EWMAxG For

Smoothed expected goals created per match — top attacks hit > 2.5/match, mid-table sits around 1.4.

1.41
1.73
EWMAxG Against

Smoothed expected goals conceded per match — elite defenses < 1.0, struggling sides > 2.0.

1.46
-0.10
EWMAxG Diff

Net xG: attack minus defense. ±1 is dominant/poor; ±2 is title-contender or crisis-level.

-0.06
0.02
EWMAFinishing Edge

Goals scored minus xG. +0.3 is clinical, −0.3 is wasteful; ±1 is statistical outlier.

-0.01
0.12
EWMAxG per Shot

Average chance quality per attempt — 0.10 is mid, 0.15+ means the team only shoots from dangerous spots.

0.12

Shots Quality

Shots Qualityvolume & accuracy
1110
10.67
Avg Shots

Total shots per match — pure attacking volume (> 16.5/match is elite).

3/110/10
4.00
Avg Shots on Target

Shots on target per match — strikes the keeper had to handle (> 5.5/match is heavy).

3/110/10
8.33
Avg Shots in Box

Shots taken from inside the penalty area — proximity to goal (> 8.5/match means consistent box presence).

3/110/10
78%
Box Shot %

Share of shots taken from inside the box — chance-selection quality. Mid sits ~60%, elite > 75%.

3/110/10
38%
On-Target %

Share of shots that hit the target — striking accuracy. Mid ~33%, elite > 40%.

3/110/10
16%
Shot Conversion

Goals per shot taken — clinical efficiency. ~10% is league average, > 15% is elite finishing.

3/110/10

Possession & Passing

Possession & Passingball control
1110
58%
Avg Possession

Share of match time with the ball. > 55% is dominant, < 40% is reactive.

3/110/10
84%
Pass Accuracy

Share of passes completed — distribution quality. Mid sits ~80%, elite > 88%.

3/110/10
518.33
Avg Passes

Total passes attempted per match — distribution volume. Top sides > 550, bottom sides < 400.

3/110/10
0.06
EWMAPossession Trend

Smoothed possession differential — team minus opponent. ±0.1 is normal, ±0.2 is strong dominance.

0.05

HT / FT Patterns

HT / FT Patternshalf-time vs full-time outcomes
1110
36%4/11
Leading at HT38%

Share of matches the team led at halftime — fast-start signal.

40%4/10
45%5/11
Level at HT

Share of matches level at halftime — balanced or low-tempo openings.

40%4/10
18%2/11
Trailing at HT

Share of matches the team trailed at halftime — slow starts (lower is better).

20%2/10
73%8/11
HT/FT Same Outcome66%

Share of matches where the W/D/L state at halftime matched the full-time result — game-state stability.

60%6/10
100%4/4
Led at HT → Won100%

Of matches led at HT, share converted into a full-time win — closing strength.

100%4/4
50%1/2
Trailed at HT → Recovered25%

Of matches trailing at HT, share rescued to a draw or win — comeback resilience.

0%0/2

Goal Timing

Goal Timingwhen goals happen
events 11/1110/101110
18%
0-15'12%

Hot starts — share of the team's goals scored in the opening 15 minutes.

6%
18%
16-30'15%

Early control — share scored between the 16th and 30th minute.

13%
12%
31-45'15%

Pre-HT push — share scored in the run-up to halftime.

19%
18%
46-60'18%

Restart wave — share scored in the first 15 minutes after HT.

19%
18%
61-75'28%

Game-state shift — share scored between minutes 61 and 75.

38%
18%
76-90+'12%

Late-game finishers — share scored from the 76th minute onwards (incl. stoppage time).

6%

First-Goal Edge

First-Goal Edgewho strikes first
events 11/1110/101110
70%7/10
Scored First65%

Share of matches where the team opened the scoring — fast-start signal.

60%6/10
30%3/10
Conceded First

Share of matches where the team conceded the opening goal (lower is better).

40%4/10
71%5/7
Win when Scoring First86%

Of matches the team scored first, share converted into a win — closing strength after the opener.

100%6/6
67%2/3
Win when Conceding First46%

Of matches conceding first, share rescued into a win — comeback strength.

25%1/4
39'
Avg Min. 1st Goal Scored

Average minute of the team's first goal — earlier means faster starters.

41'
18'
Avg Min. 1st Goal Conceded

Average minute of the first goal conceded — later is better (defense holds longer).

8'

Late-Game Strength

Late-Game Strengthafter the 75th minute
events 11/1110/101110
27%3/11
Scored after 75'19%

Share of matches with a late goal scored by the team — late finishers signal.

10%1/10
9%1/11
Conceded after 75'

Share of matches the team conceded a late goal — late-game vulnerability (lower is better).

10%1/10
100%4/4
Lead Saved after 75'100%

Of matches leading at 75', share closed out for a win — closing strength.

100%7/7
0%0/4
Lead Lost after 75'

Of matches leading at 75', share dropped to a draw or loss — late-game collapse risk.

0%0/7
18%2/11
Any Goal in Stoppage Time

Share of matches with any goal in stoppage time (90+) — late-drama frequency.

0%0/10

Set Pieces

Set Piecespenalty / own-goal share
events 11/1110/101110
88%15/17
Open-Play Share88%

Of the team's scored goals, share from open play — non-set-piece scoring quality.

88%14/16
12%2/17
Penalty Share

Of the team's scored goals, share from penalty kicks — penalty dependency.

13%2/16
0%0/17
Opp Own-Goal Bonus

Of the team's scored goals, share that were opponent own-goals — pressure / fortune.

0%0/16
11%1/9
Penalty Conceded Share

Of conceded goals, share from opponent penalties — defensive discipline (lower is better).

0%0/8
11%1/9
Own-Goal Cost

Of conceded goals, share that were the team's own goals — pressure-induced errors (lower is better).

0%0/8

Corners

Cornersset-piece pressure
1110
5.67
Avg Corners For

Average corners won per match — attacking territorial pressure (> 5.5 is heavy).

3/110/10
4.67
Avg Corners Against

Average corners conceded per match — territorial pressure faced (lower is better).

3/110/10
55%
Corner Share

Share of total corners in the team's matches that went to the team — territorial dominance ratio.

3/110/10
0.70
EWMACorners Diff

Smoothed corner differential per match — long-term territorial advantage (±2 is strong).

1.04
100%3/3
Match Corners > 8.5

Share of matches with total corners > 8.5 (Over 8.5 line) — high-tempo encounter signal.

0/0
3/110/10
67%2/3
Match Corners > 9.5

Share of matches with total corners > 9.5 (Over 9.5 line).

0/0
3/110/10
33%1/3
Match Corners > 10.5

Share of matches with total corners > 10.5 (Over 10.5 line) — corner-heavy clashes only.

0/0
3/110/10

Cards & Discipline

Cards & Disciplineyellows, reds & fouls
events 11/1110/101110
0.67
Avg Yellow Cards

Yellow cards picked up per match — discipline signal (lower is better).

3/110/10
0%0/3
Red Card Match Rate

Share of matches with at least one red card to the team — sending-off risk.

0/0
3/110/10
10.00
Avg Fouls

Fouls committed per match — aggression / tactical-foul tendency (lower is calmer).

3/110/10
44%4/9
Match Cards > 3.550%

Share of matches with total card points (both teams, yellow=1 / red=2, 2Y→R counted as 2) > 3.5 — Over 3.5 line.

56%5/9
9/119/10
22%2/9
Match Cards > 4.533%

Share of matches with total card points > 4.5 — Over 4.5 line.

44%4/9
9/119/10
79%
Cards in 2nd Half

Share of card events that occur after halftime — late-discipline tendency.

77%