Cup·
Round of 32·06/20/2026·03:00 PM
Metta / LU
Metta / LU
WDWWL
VS
Ķekava / Auda
Ķekava / Auda
WLWDW

Stats below use each team's main league —1. LigaLatvia

Last 10Cup
LU10matchesAuda8matches

Not in either team's main domestic league — every panel below reflects each team's most recent matches across all competitions.

Coverage varies by leaguetop-tier competitions have richer per-match data; lower divisions and smaller leagues track fewer metrics, so some panels may be sparse or missing entirely.
Pre-match snapshotevery value reflects each team's state going into kick-off — frozen before the match starts, not updated live.

Overall

Overallteam-strength snapshot
80%
Overall

Composite team strength — average of LTQ and Hype.

59%
1340
ELO

Chess-style strength rating going into kick-off.

1259
77%
LTQ

Long-term quality across all competitions.

53%
83%
Hype

Short-term fixture buzz / excitement signal.

65%
4.42
Momentum

Recent goal-scoring trend (weighted goals signal).

4.29

Match Outcome

Match Outcomeresults breakdown
108
2.50
Points per Game

Average points per match across the sampled games (max 3).

1.62
80%
Win Rate

Share of sampled matches won.

50%
10%
Draw Rate

Share of sampled matches that ended level.

13%
10%
Loss Rate

Share of sampled matches lost (lower is better).

38%
60%
Clean Sheet36%

Share of matches with no goals conceded.

13%
0%
Failed to Score

Share of matches where the team didn't score (lower is better).

13%

Goal Scoring

Goal Scoringattacking output
108
3.50
Avg Goals Scored

Goals scored per match across the sampled games.

2.50
100%
Scored > 0.594%

Share of matches where the team scored at least once.

88%
90%
Over 1.595%

Share of matches with total goals > 1.5.

100%
80%
Over 2.590%

Share of matches with total goals > 2.5.

100%
60%
Over 3.561%

Share of matches with total goals > 3.5 — high-scoring affairs.

63%
40%
BTTS57%

Share of matches where both teams scored.

75%
20%
BTTS & Win

Share of matches won while both teams scored — strong attack with a defensive lapse.

38%
70%
Scored Both Halves56%

Share of matches with a goal in both the 1st and 2nd half.

43%

Defensive Solidity

Defensive Soliditygoals & shots conceded
108
0.60
Avg Goals Conceded

Goals conceded per match (lower is better).

2.38
60%
Clean Sheet36%

Share of matches with no goals conceded.

13%

HT / FT Patterns

HT / FT Patternshalf-time vs full-time outcomes
108
90%9/10
Leading at HT66%

Share of matches the team led at halftime — fast-start signal.

43%3/7
10%1/10
Level at HT

Share of matches level at halftime — balanced or low-tempo openings.

29%2/7
0%0/10
Trailing at HT

Share of matches the team trailed at halftime — slow starts (lower is better).

29%2/7
80%8/10
HT/FT Same Outcome83%

Share of matches where the W/D/L state at halftime matched the full-time result — game-state stability.

86%6/7
89%8/9
Led at HT → Won94%

Of matches led at HT, share converted into a full-time win — closing strength.

100%3/3
0/0
Trailed at HT → Recovered

Of matches trailing at HT, share rescued to a draw or win — comeback resilience.

0%0/2

Goal Timing

Goal Timingwhen goals happen
events 9/105/8108
15%
0-15'8%

Hot starts — share of the team's goals scored in the opening 15 minutes.

0%
18%
16-30'9%

Early control — share scored between the 16th and 30th minute.

0%
24%
31-45'15%

Pre-HT push — share scored in the run-up to halftime.

6%
12%
46-60'15%

Restart wave — share scored in the first 15 minutes after HT.

19%
12%
61-75'15%

Game-state shift — share scored between minutes 61 and 75.

19%
18%
76-90+'37%

Late-game finishers — share scored from the 76th minute onwards (incl. stoppage time).

56%

First-Goal Edge

First-Goal Edgewho strikes first
events 9/105/8108
89%8/9
Scored First64%

Share of matches where the team opened the scoring — fast-start signal.

40%2/5
11%1/9
Conceded First

Share of matches where the team conceded the opening goal (lower is better).

60%3/5
100%8/8
Win when Scoring First100%

Of matches the team scored first, share converted into a win — closing strength after the opener.

100%2/2
0%0/1
Win when Conceding First0%

Of matches conceding first, share rescued into a win — comeback strength.

0%0/3
16'
Avg Min. 1st Goal Scored

Average minute of the team's first goal — earlier means faster starters.

51'
53'
Avg Min. 1st Goal Conceded

Average minute of the first goal conceded — later is better (defense holds longer).

26'

Late-Game Strength

Late-Game Strengthafter the 75th minute
events 9/105/8108
44%4/9
Scored after 75'62%

Share of matches with a late goal scored by the team — late finishers signal.

80%4/5
0%0/9
Conceded after 75'

Share of matches the team conceded a late goal — late-game vulnerability (lower is better).

60%3/5
100%8/8
Lead Saved after 75'100%

Of matches leading at 75', share closed out for a win — closing strength.

100%2/2
0%0/8
Lead Lost after 75'

Of matches leading at 75', share dropped to a draw or loss — late-game collapse risk.

0%0/2
0%0/9
Any Goal in Stoppage Time

Share of matches with any goal in stoppage time (90+) — late-drama frequency.

40%2/5

Set Pieces

Set Piecespenalty / own-goal share
events 9/105/8108
100%33/33
Open-Play Share88%

Of the team's scored goals, share from open play — non-set-piece scoring quality.

75%12/16
0%0/33
Penalty Share

Of the team's scored goals, share from penalty kicks — penalty dependency.

25%4/16
0%0/33
Opp Own-Goal Bonus

Of the team's scored goals, share that were opponent own-goals — pressure / fortune.

0%0/16
25%1/4
Penalty Conceded Share

Of conceded goals, share from opponent penalties — defensive discipline (lower is better).

31%5/16
0%0/4
Own-Goal Cost

Of conceded goals, share that were the team's own goals — pressure-induced errors (lower is better).

0%0/16

Cards & Discipline

Cards & Disciplineyellows, reds & fouls
events 9/105/8108
0/0
Match Cards > 3.5

Share of matches with total card points (both teams, yellow=1 / red=2, 2Y→R counted as 2) > 3.5 — Over 3.5 line.

100%1/1
0/101/8
0/0
Match Cards > 4.5

Share of matches with total card points > 4.5 — Over 4.5 line.

100%1/1
0/101/8
Cards in 2nd Half

Share of card events that occur after halftime — late-discipline tendency.

100%

Venue Edge

Venue EdgeLU at home · Auda on the road
54
2.40
PPG at Venue

Points per match at the venue — home team at home, away team away.

2.25
80%4/5
Win Rate78%

Share of sampled matches won.

75%3/4
20%1/5
Loss Rate

Share of sampled matches lost (lower is better).

25%1/4
4.00
Avg Goals Scored

Goals scored per match across the sampled games.

3.25
0.60
Avg Goals Conceded

Goals conceded per match (lower is better).

2.00
60%3/5
Clean Sheet43%

Share of matches with no goals conceded.

25%1/4
40%2/5
BTTS57%

Share of matches where both teams scored.

75%3/4
80%4/5
Over 2.590%

Share of venue matches with total goals > 2.5.

100%4/4