1 Lyga·
Regular Season - 14·06/20/2026·04:00 PM
BFA
BFA
WWWLL
VS
Hegelmann II
Hegelmann II
LLLLL
Neutral📍 Sirvintu stadionas, Sirvintos
Season stats1 Lyga
BFA11matchesII11matches

Every panel below reflects each team's matches in 1 Lyga.

Coverage varies by leaguetop-tier competitions have richer per-match data; lower divisions and smaller leagues track fewer metrics, so some panels may be sparse or missing entirely.
Pre-match snapshotevery value reflects each team's state going into kick-off — frozen before the match starts, not updated live.

Overall

Overallteam-strength snapshot
64%
Overall

Composite team strength — average of LTQ and Hype.

23%
1446
ELO

Chess-style strength rating going into kick-off.

1328
57%
LTQ

Long-term quality across all competitions.

31%
70%
Hype

Short-term fixture buzz / excitement signal.

15%
3.51
Momentum

Recent goal-scoring trend (weighted goals signal).

4.08

Match Outcome

Match Outcomeresults breakdown
1111
1.45
Points per Game

Average points per match across the sampled games (max 3).

0.64
45%
Win Rate

Share of sampled matches won.

18%
9%
Draw Rate

Share of sampled matches that ended level.

9%
45%
Loss Rate

Share of sampled matches lost (lower is better).

73%
27%
Clean Sheet18%

Share of matches with no goals conceded.

9%
36%
Failed to Score

Share of matches where the team didn't score (lower is better).

36%

Goal Scoring

Goal Scoringattacking output
1111
1.27
Avg Goals Scored

Goals scored per match across the sampled games.

1.09
64%
Scored > 0.564%

Share of matches where the team scored at least once.

64%
64%
Over 1.582%

Share of matches with total goals > 1.5.

100%
64%
Over 2.568%

Share of matches with total goals > 2.5.

73%
55%
Over 3.545%

Share of matches with total goals > 3.5 — high-scoring affairs.

36%
45%
BTTS50%

Share of matches where both teams scored.

55%
27%
BTTS & Win

Share of matches won while both teams scored — strong attack with a defensive lapse.

9%
18%
Scored Both Halves23%

Share of matches with a goal in both the 1st and 2nd half.

27%

Defensive Solidity

Defensive Soliditygoals & shots conceded
1111
1.82
Avg Goals Conceded

Goals conceded per match (lower is better).

2.45
27%
Clean Sheet18%

Share of matches with no goals conceded.

9%

HT / FT Patterns

HT / FT Patternshalf-time vs full-time outcomes
1111
9%1/11
Leading at HT9%

Share of matches the team led at halftime — fast-start signal.

9%1/11
73%8/11
Level at HT

Share of matches level at halftime — balanced or low-tempo openings.

27%3/11
18%2/11
Trailing at HT

Share of matches the team trailed at halftime — slow starts (lower is better).

64%7/11
27%3/11
HT/FT Same Outcome45%

Share of matches where the W/D/L state at halftime matched the full-time result — game-state stability.

64%7/11
100%1/1
Led at HT → Won100%

Of matches led at HT, share converted into a full-time win — closing strength.

100%1/1
50%1/2
Trailed at HT → Recovered32%

Of matches trailing at HT, share rescued to a draw or win — comeback resilience.

14%1/7

Goal Timing

Goal Timingwhen goals happen
events 10/1111/111111
0%
0-15'8%

Hot starts — share of the team's goals scored in the opening 15 minutes.

15%
7%
16-30'11%

Early control — share scored between the 16th and 30th minute.

15%
13%
31-45'11%

Pre-HT push — share scored in the run-up to halftime.

8%
27%
46-60'25%

Restart wave — share scored in the first 15 minutes after HT.

23%
27%
61-75'29%

Game-state shift — share scored between minutes 61 and 75.

31%
27%
76-90+'17%

Late-game finishers — share scored from the 76th minute onwards (incl. stoppage time).

8%

First-Goal Edge

First-Goal Edgewho strikes first
events 10/1111/111111
60%6/10
Scored First44%

Share of matches where the team opened the scoring — fast-start signal.

27%3/11
40%4/10
Conceded First

Share of matches where the team conceded the opening goal (lower is better).

73%8/11
67%4/6
Win when Scoring First67%

Of matches the team scored first, share converted into a win — closing strength after the opener.

67%2/3
25%1/4
Win when Conceding First13%

Of matches conceding first, share rescued into a win — comeback strength.

0%0/8
56'
Avg Min. 1st Goal Scored

Average minute of the team's first goal — earlier means faster starters.

11'
35'
Avg Min. 1st Goal Conceded

Average minute of the first goal conceded — later is better (defense holds longer).

23'

Late-Game Strength

Late-Game Strengthafter the 75th minute
events 10/1111/111111
30%3/10
Scored after 75'24%

Share of matches with a late goal scored by the team — late finishers signal.

18%2/11
10%1/10
Conceded after 75'

Share of matches the team conceded a late goal — late-game vulnerability (lower is better).

27%3/11
100%3/3
Lead Saved after 75'83%

Of matches leading at 75', share closed out for a win — closing strength.

67%2/3
0%0/3
Lead Lost after 75'

Of matches leading at 75', share dropped to a draw or loss — late-game collapse risk.

33%1/3
30%3/10
Any Goal in Stoppage Time

Share of matches with any goal in stoppage time (90+) — late-drama frequency.

9%1/11

Set Pieces

Set Piecespenalty / own-goal share
events 10/1111/111111
73%11/15
Open-Play Share79%

Of the team's scored goals, share from open play — non-set-piece scoring quality.

85%11/13
27%4/15
Penalty Share

Of the team's scored goals, share from penalty kicks — penalty dependency.

8%1/13
0%0/15
Opp Own-Goal Bonus

Of the team's scored goals, share that were opponent own-goals — pressure / fortune.

8%1/13
15%3/20
Penalty Conceded Share

Of conceded goals, share from opponent penalties — defensive discipline (lower is better).

0%0/26
0%0/20
Own-Goal Cost

Of conceded goals, share that were the team's own goals — pressure-induced errors (lower is better).

0%0/26

Cards & Discipline

Cards & Disciplineyellows, reds & fouls
events 10/1111/111111
100%
Cards in 2nd Half

Share of card events that occur after halftime — late-discipline tendency.

100%