1. Division·
Regular Season - 11·06/14/2026·02:00 PM
hodd
hodd
LWLDW
VS
Kongsvinger
Kongsvinger
WLWWD
Season stats1. Division
hodd10matchesKongsvinger10matches

Every panel below reflects each team's matches in 1. Division.

Coverage varies by leaguetop-tier competitions have richer per-match data; lower divisions and smaller leagues track fewer metrics, so some panels may be sparse or missing entirely.
Pre-match snapshotevery value reflects each team's state going into kick-off — frozen before the match starts, not updated live.

Overall

Overallteam-strength snapshot
50%
Overall

Composite team strength — average of LTQ and Hype.

71%
1357
ELO

Chess-style strength rating going into kick-off.

1597
48%
LTQ

Long-term quality across all competitions.

73%
51%
Hype

Short-term fixture buzz / excitement signal.

68%
2.89
Momentum

Recent goal-scoring trend (weighted goals signal).

3.40

Match Outcome

Match Outcomeresults breakdown
1010
1.40
Points per Game

Average points per match across the sampled games (max 3).

2.30
40%
Win Rate

Share of sampled matches won.

70%
20%
Draw Rate

Share of sampled matches that ended level.

20%
40%
Loss Rate

Share of sampled matches lost (lower is better).

10%
10%
Clean Sheet15%

Share of matches with no goals conceded.

20%
30%
Failed to Score

Share of matches where the team didn't score (lower is better).

10%

Goal Scoring

Goal Scoringattacking output
1010
1.30
Avg Goals Scored

Goals scored per match across the sampled games.

2.30
70%
Scored > 0.580%

Share of matches where the team scored at least once.

90%
70%
Over 1.585%

Share of matches with total goals > 1.5.

100%
50%
Over 2.565%

Share of matches with total goals > 2.5.

80%
30%
Over 3.535%

Share of matches with total goals > 3.5 — high-scoring affairs.

40%
60%
BTTS65%

Share of matches where both teams scored.

70%
30%
BTTS & Win

Share of matches won while both teams scored — strong attack with a defensive lapse.

50%
30%
Scored Both Halves40%

Share of matches with a goal in both the 1st and 2nd half.

50%

Defensive Solidity

Defensive Soliditygoals & shots conceded
1010
1.30
Avg Goals Conceded

Goals conceded per match (lower is better).

1.10
10%
Clean Sheet15%

Share of matches with no goals conceded.

20%

HT / FT Patterns

HT / FT Patternshalf-time vs full-time outcomes
1010
40%4/10
Leading at HT45%

Share of matches the team led at halftime — fast-start signal.

50%5/10
40%4/10
Level at HT

Share of matches level at halftime — balanced or low-tempo openings.

20%2/10
20%2/10
Trailing at HT

Share of matches the team trailed at halftime — slow starts (lower is better).

30%3/10
50%5/10
HT/FT Same Outcome55%

Share of matches where the W/D/L state at halftime matched the full-time result — game-state stability.

60%6/10
50%2/4
Led at HT → Won65%

Of matches led at HT, share converted into a full-time win — closing strength.

80%4/5
0%0/2
Trailed at HT → Recovered33%

Of matches trailing at HT, share rescued to a draw or win — comeback resilience.

67%2/3

Goal Timing

Goal Timingwhen goals happen
events 10/1010/101010
31%
0-15'23%

Hot starts — share of the team's goals scored in the opening 15 minutes.

14%
15%
16-30'12%

Early control — share scored between the 16th and 30th minute.

10%
8%
31-45'6%

Pre-HT push — share scored in the run-up to halftime.

5%
23%
46-60'26%

Restart wave — share scored in the first 15 minutes after HT.

29%
15%
61-75'20%

Game-state shift — share scored between minutes 61 and 75.

24%
8%
76-90+'13%

Late-game finishers — share scored from the 76th minute onwards (incl. stoppage time).

19%

First-Goal Edge

First-Goal Edgewho strikes first
events 10/1010/101010
70%7/10
Scored First60%

Share of matches where the team opened the scoring — fast-start signal.

50%5/10
30%3/10
Conceded First

Share of matches where the team conceded the opening goal (lower is better).

50%5/10
57%4/7
Win when Scoring First69%

Of matches the team scored first, share converted into a win — closing strength after the opener.

80%4/5
0%0/3
Win when Conceding First30%

Of matches conceding first, share rescued into a win — comeback strength.

60%3/5
25'
Avg Min. 1st Goal Scored

Average minute of the team's first goal — earlier means faster starters.

23'
36'
Avg Min. 1st Goal Conceded

Average minute of the first goal conceded — later is better (defense holds longer).

33'

Late-Game Strength

Late-Game Strengthafter the 75th minute
events 10/1010/101010
10%1/10
Scored after 75'25%

Share of matches with a late goal scored by the team — late finishers signal.

40%4/10
20%2/10
Conceded after 75'

Share of matches the team conceded a late goal — late-game vulnerability (lower is better).

30%3/10
75%3/4
Lead Saved after 75'79%

Of matches leading at 75', share closed out for a win — closing strength.

83%5/6
25%1/4
Lead Lost after 75'

Of matches leading at 75', share dropped to a draw or loss — late-game collapse risk.

17%1/6
0%0/10
Any Goal in Stoppage Time

Share of matches with any goal in stoppage time (90+) — late-drama frequency.

0%0/10

Set Pieces

Set Piecespenalty / own-goal share
events 10/1010/101010
77%10/13
Open-Play Share84%

Of the team's scored goals, share from open play — non-set-piece scoring quality.

90%19/21
23%3/13
Penalty Share

Of the team's scored goals, share from penalty kicks — penalty dependency.

10%2/21
0%0/13
Opp Own-Goal Bonus

Of the team's scored goals, share that were opponent own-goals — pressure / fortune.

0%0/21
0%0/13
Penalty Conceded Share

Of conceded goals, share from opponent penalties — defensive discipline (lower is better).

0%0/13
0%0/13
Own-Goal Cost

Of conceded goals, share that were the team's own goals — pressure-induced errors (lower is better).

15%2/13

Cards & Discipline

Cards & Disciplineyellows, reds & fouls
events 10/1010/101010
78%7/9
Match Cards > 3.564%

Share of matches with total card points (both teams, yellow=1 / red=2, 2Y→R counted as 2) > 3.5 — Over 3.5 line.

50%3/6
9/106/10
33%3/9
Match Cards > 4.533%

Share of matches with total card points > 4.5 — Over 4.5 line.

33%2/6
9/106/10
75%
Cards in 2nd Half

Share of card events that occur after halftime — late-discipline tendency.

69%

Venue Edge

Venue Edgehodd at home · Kongsvinger on the road
55
2.00
PPG at Venue

Points per match at the venue — home team at home, away team away.

1.60
60%3/5
Win Rate50%

Share of sampled matches won.

40%2/5
20%1/5
Loss Rate

Share of sampled matches lost (lower is better).

20%1/5
1.60
Avg Goals Scored

Goals scored per match across the sampled games.

1.80
1.20
Avg Goals Conceded

Goals conceded per match (lower is better).

1.20
20%1/5
Clean Sheet20%

Share of matches with no goals conceded.

20%1/5
60%3/5
BTTS60%

Share of matches where both teams scored.

60%3/5
60%3/5
Over 2.560%

Share of venue matches with total goals > 2.5.

60%3/5