3. SNL - West·
West - 26·05/24/2026·03:00 PM
Vipava
Vipava
DWLDW
2-2
Finished
HT0-2
Dob
Dob
DLLWW
Season stats3. SNL - West
Vipava19matchesDob20matches

Every panel below reflects each team's matches in 3. SNL - West.

Coverage varies by leaguetop-tier competitions have richer per-match data; lower divisions and smaller leagues track fewer metrics, so some panels may be sparse or missing entirely.
Pre-match snapshotevery value reflects each team's state going into kick-off — frozen before the match starts, not updated live.

Overall

Overallteam-strength snapshot
60%
Overall

Composite team strength — average of LTQ and Hype.

56%
1204
ELO

Chess-style strength rating going into kick-off.

1279
54%
LTQ

Long-term quality across all competitions.

70%
65%
Hype

Short-term fixture buzz / excitement signal.

42%
1.60
Momentum

Recent goal-scoring trend (weighted goals signal).

3.41

Match Outcome

Match Outcomeresults breakdown
1920
1.00
Points per Game

Average points per match across the sampled games (max 3).

2.10
21%
Win Rate

Share of sampled matches won.

65%
37%
Draw Rate

Share of sampled matches that ended level.

15%
42%
Loss Rate

Share of sampled matches lost (lower is better).

20%
21%
Clean Sheet33%

Share of matches with no goals conceded.

45%
42%
Failed to Score

Share of matches where the team didn't score (lower is better).

10%

Goal Scoring

Goal Scoringattacking output
1920
0.95
Avg Goals Scored

Goals scored per match across the sampled games.

1.85
58%
Scored > 0.574%

Share of matches where the team scored at least once.

90%
68%
Over 1.572%

Share of matches with total goals > 1.5.

75%
53%
Over 2.556%

Share of matches with total goals > 2.5.

60%
16%
Over 3.518%

Share of matches with total goals > 3.5 — high-scoring affairs.

20%
53%
BTTS49%

Share of matches where both teams scored.

45%
16%
BTTS & Win

Share of matches won while both teams scored — strong attack with a defensive lapse.

20%
16%
Scored Both Halves25%

Share of matches with a goal in both the 1st and 2nd half.

35%

Defensive Solidity

Defensive Soliditygoals & shots conceded
1920
1.47
Avg Goals Conceded

Goals conceded per match (lower is better).

0.85
21%
Clean Sheet33%

Share of matches with no goals conceded.

45%

xG Trends

xG TrendsEWMA-smoothed performance
1920
1.10
EWMAxG For

Smoothed expected goals created per match — top attacks hit > 2.5/match, mid-table sits around 1.4.

2.46
1.45
EWMAxG Against

Smoothed expected goals conceded per match — elite defenses < 1.0, struggling sides > 2.0.

1.23
-0.35
EWMAxG Diff

Net xG: attack minus defense. ±1 is dominant/poor; ±2 is title-contender or crisis-level.

1.23
-0.17
EWMAFinishing Edge

Goals scored minus xG. +0.3 is clinical, −0.3 is wasteful; ±1 is statistical outlier.

-0.44

HT / FT Patterns

HT / FT Patternshalf-time vs full-time outcomes
1920
11%2/19
Leading at HT28%

Share of matches the team led at halftime — fast-start signal.

45%9/20
53%10/19
Level at HT

Share of matches level at halftime — balanced or low-tempo openings.

30%6/20
37%7/19
Trailing at HT

Share of matches the team trailed at halftime — slow starts (lower is better).

25%5/20
68%13/19
HT/FT Same Outcome72%

Share of matches where the W/D/L state at halftime matched the full-time result — game-state stability.

75%15/20
50%1/2
Led at HT → Won75%

Of matches led at HT, share converted into a full-time win — closing strength.

100%9/9
14%1/7
Trailed at HT → Recovered17%

Of matches trailing at HT, share rescued to a draw or win — comeback resilience.

20%1/5

Venue Edge

Venue EdgeVipava at home · Dob on the road
910
1.44
PPG at Venue

Points per match at the venue — home team at home, away team away.

1.70
33%3/9
Win Rate42%

Share of sampled matches won.

50%5/10
22%2/9
Loss Rate

Share of sampled matches lost (lower is better).

30%3/10
1.00
Avg Goals Scored

Goals scored per match across the sampled games.

1.70
1.11
Avg Goals Conceded

Goals conceded per match (lower is better).

0.90
22%2/9
Clean Sheet31%

Share of matches with no goals conceded.

40%4/10
67%6/9
BTTS53%

Share of matches where both teams scored.

40%4/10
44%4/9
Over 2.547%

Share of venue matches with total goals > 2.5.

50%5/10
1.19
EWMAAttack xG (EWMA)

Smoothed xG created at venue — long-term attacking strength in this fixture's venue context.

2.22
1.19
EWMADefense xG (EWMA)

Smoothed xG conceded at venue — defensive strength in this fixture's venue context (lower is better).

1.00