Primera División - Apertura·
Intermediate Round - 2·05/31/2025·14:00
Progreso
Progreso
LLWLW
0-1
Finished
HT0-0
Danubio
Danubio
WWDLL
📍 Parque Abraham Paladino, Montevideo
Season statsPrimera División - Apertura
Progreso16matchesDanubio16matches

Every panel below reflects each team's matches in Primera División - Apertura.

Coverage varies by leaguetop-tier competitions have richer per-match data; lower divisions and smaller leagues track fewer metrics, so some panels may be sparse or missing entirely.
Pre-match snapshotevery value reflects each team's state going into kick-off — frozen before the match starts, not updated live.

Overall

Overallteam-strength snapshot
45%
Overall

Composite team strength — average of LTQ and Hype.

54%
1271
ELO

Chess-style strength rating going into kick-off.

1358
45%
LTQ

Long-term quality across all competitions.

45%
44%
Hype

Short-term fixture buzz / excitement signal.

62%
2.50
Momentum

Recent goal-scoring trend (weighted goals signal).

1.84

Match Outcome

Match Outcomeresults breakdown
1616
0.94
Points per Game

Average points per match across the sampled games (max 3).

0.94
19%
Win Rate

Share of sampled matches won.

13%
38%
Draw Rate

Share of sampled matches that ended level.

56%
44%
Loss Rate

Share of sampled matches lost (lower is better).

31%
6%
Clean Sheet13%

Share of matches with no goals conceded.

19%
25%
Failed to Score

Share of matches where the team didn't score (lower is better).

38%

Goal Scoring

Goal Scoringattacking output
1616
1.06
Avg Goals Scored

Goals scored per match across the sampled games.

0.88
75%
Scored > 0.569%

Share of matches where the team scored at least once.

63%
81%
Over 1.575%

Share of matches with total goals > 1.5.

69%
50%
Over 2.538%

Share of matches with total goals > 2.5.

25%
31%
Over 3.522%

Share of matches with total goals > 3.5 — high-scoring affairs.

13%
75%
BTTS66%

Share of matches where both teams scored.

56%
19%
BTTS & Win

Share of matches won while both teams scored — strong attack with a defensive lapse.

6%
13%
Scored Both Halves9%

Share of matches with a goal in both the 1st and 2nd half.

6%

Defensive Solidity

Defensive Soliditygoals & shots conceded
1616
1.75
Avg Goals Conceded

Goals conceded per match (lower is better).

1.06
6%
Clean Sheet13%

Share of matches with no goals conceded.

19%

xG Trends

xG TrendsEWMA-smoothed performance
1616
1.18
EWMAxG For

Smoothed expected goals created per match — top attacks hit > 2.5/match, mid-table sits around 1.4.

1.11
1.91
EWMAxG Against

Smoothed expected goals conceded per match — elite defenses < 1.0, struggling sides > 2.0.

1.15
-0.73
EWMAxG Diff

Net xG: attack minus defense. ±1 is dominant/poor; ±2 is title-contender or crisis-level.

-0.04
-0.21
EWMAFinishing Edge

Goals scored minus xG. +0.3 is clinical, −0.3 is wasteful; ±1 is statistical outlier.

-0.18
EWMAxG per Shot

Average chance quality per attempt — 0.10 is mid, 0.15+ means the team only shoots from dangerous spots.

0.09

Possession & Passing

Possession & Passingball control
1616
EWMAPossession Trend

Smoothed possession differential — team minus opponent. ±0.1 is normal, ±0.2 is strong dominance.

0.08

HT / FT Patterns

HT / FT Patternshalf-time vs full-time outcomes
1616
19%3/16
Leading at HT16%

Share of matches the team led at halftime — fast-start signal.

13%2/16
31%5/16
Level at HT

Share of matches level at halftime — balanced or low-tempo openings.

63%10/16
50%8/16
Trailing at HT

Share of matches the team trailed at halftime — slow starts (lower is better).

25%4/16
63%10/16
HT/FT Same Outcome56%

Share of matches where the W/D/L state at halftime matched the full-time result — game-state stability.

50%8/16
33%1/3
Led at HT → Won42%

Of matches led at HT, share converted into a full-time win — closing strength.

50%1/2
25%2/8
Trailed at HT → Recovered50%

Of matches trailing at HT, share rescued to a draw or win — comeback resilience.

75%3/4

Goal Timing

Goal Timingwhen goals happen
events 16/1616/161616
12%
0-15'17%

Hot starts — share of the team's goals scored in the opening 15 minutes.

23%
6%
16-30'7%

Early control — share scored between the 16th and 30th minute.

8%
6%
31-45'11%

Pre-HT push — share scored in the run-up to halftime.

15%
29%
46-60'22%

Restart wave — share scored in the first 15 minutes after HT.

15%
12%
61-75'10%

Game-state shift — share scored between minutes 61 and 75.

8%
35%
76-90+'33%

Late-game finishers — share scored from the 76th minute onwards (incl. stoppage time).

31%

First-Goal Edge

First-Goal Edgewho strikes first
events 16/1616/161616
40%6/15
Scored First34%

Share of matches where the team opened the scoring — fast-start signal.

29%4/14
60%9/15
Conceded First

Share of matches where the team conceded the opening goal (lower is better).

71%10/14
33%2/6
Win when Scoring First29%

Of matches the team scored first, share converted into a win — closing strength after the opener.

25%1/4
11%1/9
Win when Conceding First11%

Of matches conceding first, share rescued into a win — comeback strength.

10%1/10
36'
Avg Min. 1st Goal Scored

Average minute of the team's first goal — earlier means faster starters.

16'
20'
Avg Min. 1st Goal Conceded

Average minute of the first goal conceded — later is better (defense holds longer).

44'

Late-Game Strength

Late-Game Strengthafter the 75th minute
events 16/1616/161616
38%6/16
Scored after 75'31%

Share of matches with a late goal scored by the team — late finishers signal.

25%4/16
50%8/16
Conceded after 75'

Share of matches the team conceded a late goal — late-game vulnerability (lower is better).

31%5/16
25%1/4
Lead Saved after 75'13%

Of matches leading at 75', share closed out for a win — closing strength.

0%0/1
75%3/4
Lead Lost after 75'

Of matches leading at 75', share dropped to a draw or loss — late-game collapse risk.

100%1/1
38%6/16
Any Goal in Stoppage Time

Share of matches with any goal in stoppage time (90+) — late-drama frequency.

13%2/16

Set Pieces

Set Piecespenalty / own-goal share
events 16/1616/161616
65%11/17
Open-Play Share75%

Of the team's scored goals, share from open play — non-set-piece scoring quality.

85%11/13
29%5/17
Penalty Share

Of the team's scored goals, share from penalty kicks — penalty dependency.

15%2/13
6%1/17
Opp Own-Goal Bonus

Of the team's scored goals, share that were opponent own-goals — pressure / fortune.

0%0/13
28%8/29
Penalty Conceded Share

Of conceded goals, share from opponent penalties — defensive discipline (lower is better).

22%4/18
3%1/29
Own-Goal Cost

Of conceded goals, share that were the team's own goals — pressure-induced errors (lower is better).

6%1/18

Corners

Cornersset-piece pressure
1616
EWMACorners Diff

Smoothed corner differential per match — long-term territorial advantage (±2 is strong).

-3.00

Cards & Discipline

Cards & Disciplineyellows, reds & fouls
events 16/1616/161616
100%16/16
Match Cards > 3.596%

Share of matches with total card points (both teams, yellow=1 / red=2, 2Y→R counted as 2) > 3.5 — Over 3.5 line.

93%13/14
14/16
81%13/16
Match Cards > 4.580%

Share of matches with total card points > 4.5 — Over 4.5 line.

79%11/14
14/16
69%
Cards in 2nd Half

Share of card events that occur after halftime — late-discipline tendency.

69%

Venue Edge

Venue EdgeProgreso at home · Danubio on the road
87
0.62
PPG at Venue

Points per match at the venue — home team at home, away team away.

0.86
13%1/8
Win Rate13%

Share of sampled matches won.

14%1/7
63%5/8
Loss Rate

Share of sampled matches lost (lower is better).

43%3/7
1.00
Avg Goals Scored

Goals scored per match across the sampled games.

0.86
2.13
Avg Goals Conceded

Goals conceded per match (lower is better).

1.29
0%0/8
Clean Sheet0%

Share of matches with no goals conceded.

0%0/7
75%6/8
BTTS66%

Share of matches where both teams scored.

57%4/7
63%5/8
Over 2.546%

Share of venue matches with total goals > 2.5.

29%2/7
1.05
EWMAAttack xG (EWMA)

Smoothed xG created at venue — long-term attacking strength in this fixture's venue context.

1.20
2.16
EWMADefense xG (EWMA)

Smoothed xG conceded at venue — defensive strength in this fixture's venue context (lower is better).

1.45