Third Amateur Division - VFV B·
VV B - 26·03/22/2025·14:30
Schoonbeek-Beverst
Schoonbeek-Beverst
DDDLW
2-3
Finished
Rotselaar
Rotselaar
WWDDL
📍 Hereveld Complex A, Bilzen
Season statsThird Amateur Division - VFV B
Schoonbeek-Beverst23matchesRotselaar23matches

Every panel below reflects each team's matches in Third Amateur Division - VFV B.

Coverage varies by leaguetop-tier competitions have richer per-match data; lower divisions and smaller leagues track fewer metrics, so some panels may be sparse or missing entirely.
Pre-match snapshotevery value reflects each team's state going into kick-off — frozen before the match starts, not updated live.

Overall

Overallteam-strength snapshot
64%
Overall

Composite team strength — average of LTQ and Hype.

70%
1567
ELO

Chess-style strength rating going into kick-off.

1562
68%
LTQ

Long-term quality across all competitions.

62%
59%
Hype

Short-term fixture buzz / excitement signal.

78%
3.19
Momentum

Recent goal-scoring trend (weighted goals signal).

4.15

Match Outcome

Match Outcomeresults breakdown
2323
1.96
Points per Game

Average points per match across the sampled games (max 3).

1.78
57%
Win Rate

Share of sampled matches won.

52%
26%
Draw Rate

Share of sampled matches that ended level.

22%
17%
Loss Rate

Share of sampled matches lost (lower is better).

26%
39%
Clean Sheet30%

Share of matches with no goals conceded.

22%
17%
Failed to Score

Share of matches where the team didn't score (lower is better).

26%

Goal Scoring

Goal Scoringattacking output
2323
2.04
Avg Goals Scored

Goals scored per match across the sampled games.

2.00
83%
Scored > 0.578%

Share of matches where the team scored at least once.

74%
78%
Over 1.585%

Share of matches with total goals > 1.5.

91%
65%
Over 2.561%

Share of matches with total goals > 2.5.

57%
39%
Over 3.539%

Share of matches with total goals > 3.5 — high-scoring affairs.

39%
52%
BTTS54%

Share of matches where both teams scored.

57%
26%
BTTS & Win

Share of matches won while both teams scored — strong attack with a defensive lapse.

35%
0%
Scored Both Halves0%

Share of matches with a goal in both the 1st and 2nd half.

0%

Defensive Solidity

Defensive Soliditygoals & shots conceded
2323
1.09
Avg Goals Conceded

Goals conceded per match (lower is better).

1.48
39%
Clean Sheet30%

Share of matches with no goals conceded.

22%

xG Trends

xG TrendsEWMA-smoothed performance
2323
1.61
EWMAxG For

Smoothed expected goals created per match — top attacks hit > 2.5/match, mid-table sits around 1.4.

1.11
0.26
EWMAxG Against

Smoothed expected goals conceded per match — elite defenses < 1.0, struggling sides > 2.0.

2.05
1.35
EWMAxG Diff

Net xG: attack minus defense. ±1 is dominant/poor; ±2 is title-contender or crisis-level.

-0.94
0.33
EWMAFinishing Edge

Goals scored minus xG. +0.3 is clinical, −0.3 is wasteful; ±1 is statistical outlier.

1.05

HT / FT Patterns

HT / FT Patternshalf-time vs full-time outcomes
2323
0%0/3
Leading at HT0%

Share of matches the team led at halftime — fast-start signal.

0%0/5
100%3/3
Level at HT

Share of matches level at halftime — balanced or low-tempo openings.

80%4/5
0%0/3
Trailing at HT

Share of matches the team trailed at halftime — slow starts (lower is better).

20%1/5
33%1/3
HT/FT Same Outcome37%

Share of matches where the W/D/L state at halftime matched the full-time result — game-state stability.

40%2/5
0/0
Trailed at HT → Recovered

Of matches trailing at HT, share rescued to a draw or win — comeback resilience.

0%0/1

Venue Edge

Venue EdgeSchoonbeek-Beverst at home · Rotselaar on the road
1111
2.09
PPG at Venue

Points per match at the venue — home team at home, away team away.

1.55
55%6/11
Win Rate50%

Share of sampled matches won.

45%5/11
0%0/11
Loss Rate

Share of sampled matches lost (lower is better).

36%4/11
2.82
Avg Goals Scored

Goals scored per match across the sampled games.

1.55
1.00
Avg Goals Conceded

Goals conceded per match (lower is better).

1.45
36%4/11
Clean Sheet27%

Share of matches with no goals conceded.

18%2/11
64%7/11
BTTS59%

Share of matches where both teams scored.

55%6/11
73%8/11
Over 2.564%

Share of venue matches with total goals > 2.5.

55%6/11
1.89
EWMAAttack xG (EWMA)

Smoothed xG created at venue — long-term attacking strength in this fixture's venue context.

1.16
0.00
EWMADefense xG (EWMA)

Smoothed xG conceded at venue — defensive strength in this fixture's venue context (lower is better).

2.36