Eerste Divisie·
Regular Season - 20·12/20/2024·14:00
Cambuur
Cambuur
LWWDL
0-2
Finished
HT0-0
Jong AZ
Jong AZ
DLLLD
📍 Kooi Stadion, Leeuwarden
Season statsEerste Divisie
Cambuur19matchesAZ19matches

Every panel below reflects each team's matches in Eerste Divisie.

Coverage varies by leaguetop-tier competitions have richer per-match data; lower divisions and smaller leagues track fewer metrics, so some panels may be sparse or missing entirely.
Pre-match snapshotevery value reflects each team's state going into kick-off — frozen before the match starts, not updated live.

Overall

Overallteam-strength snapshot
64%
Overall

Composite team strength — average of LTQ and Hype.

38%
1515
ELO

Chess-style strength rating going into kick-off.

1417
66%
LTQ

Long-term quality across all competitions.

39%
62%
Hype

Short-term fixture buzz / excitement signal.

36%
3.58
Momentum

Recent goal-scoring trend (weighted goals signal).

3.14

Match Outcome

Match Outcomeresults breakdown
1919
1.68
Points per Game

Average points per match across the sampled games (max 3).

1.00
53%
Win Rate

Share of sampled matches won.

26%
11%
Draw Rate

Share of sampled matches that ended level.

21%
37%
Loss Rate

Share of sampled matches lost (lower is better).

53%
47%
Clean Sheet32%

Share of matches with no goals conceded.

16%
26%
Failed to Score

Share of matches where the team didn't score (lower is better).

21%

Goal Scoring

Goal Scoringattacking output
1919
1.47
Avg Goals Scored

Goals scored per match across the sampled games.

1.63
74%
Scored > 0.576%

Share of matches where the team scored at least once.

79%
58%
Over 1.568%

Share of matches with total goals > 1.5.

79%
42%
Over 2.555%

Share of matches with total goals > 2.5.

68%
26%
Over 3.539%

Share of matches with total goals > 3.5 — high-scoring affairs.

53%
32%
BTTS50%

Share of matches where both teams scored.

68%
11%
BTTS & Win

Share of matches won while both teams scored — strong attack with a defensive lapse.

16%
37%
Scored Both Halves29%

Share of matches with a goal in both the 1st and 2nd half.

21%

Defensive Solidity

Defensive Soliditygoals & shots conceded
1919
0.89
Avg Goals Conceded

Goals conceded per match (lower is better).

2.00
11.22
Avg Shots Conceded

Total shots faced per match — defensive pressure (> 17.5/match is heavy siege).

14.26
18/19
4.06
Avg SoT Conceded

Shots on target faced per match — quality of chances given up (> 5.5 is severe).

5.53
18/19
3.06
Avg Saves

Goalkeeper saves per match (> 4.5 means the keeper is doing heavy lifting).

3.37
18/19
75%
Save %68%

Share of opponent shots on target stopped by the keeper.

61%
18/19
47%
Clean Sheet32%

Share of matches with no goals conceded.

16%

xG Trends

xG TrendsEWMA-smoothed performance
1919
2.15
EWMAxG For

Smoothed expected goals created per match — top attacks hit > 2.5/match, mid-table sits around 1.4.

1.83
1.57
EWMAxG Against

Smoothed expected goals conceded per match — elite defenses < 1.0, struggling sides > 2.0.

2.33
0.58
EWMAxG Diff

Net xG: attack minus defense. ±1 is dominant/poor; ±2 is title-contender or crisis-level.

-0.50
-0.43
EWMAFinishing Edge

Goals scored minus xG. +0.3 is clinical, −0.3 is wasteful; ±1 is statistical outlier.

-0.25
0.14
EWMAxG per Shot

Average chance quality per attempt — 0.10 is mid, 0.15+ means the team only shoots from dangerous spots.

0.14

Shots Quality

Shots Qualityvolume & accuracy
1919
17.06
Avg Shots

Total shots per match — pure attacking volume (> 16.5/match is elite).

13.26
18/19
6.06
Avg Shots on Target

Shots on target per match — strikes the keeper had to handle (> 5.5/match is heavy).

4.74
18/19
10.72
Avg Shots in Box

Shots taken from inside the penalty area — proximity to goal (> 8.5/match means consistent box presence).

7.16
18/19
63%
Box Shot %58%

Share of shots taken from inside the box — chance-selection quality. Mid sits ~60%, elite > 75%.

54%
18/19
36%
On-Target %36%

Share of shots that hit the target — striking accuracy. Mid ~33%, elite > 40%.

36%
18/19
9%
Shot Conversion11%

Goals per shot taken — clinical efficiency. ~10% is league average, > 15% is elite finishing.

12%
18/19

Possession & Passing

Possession & Passingball control
1919
56%
Avg Possession

Share of match time with the ball. > 55% is dominant, < 40% is reactive.

58%
18/19
79%
Pass Accuracy

Share of passes completed — distribution quality. Mid sits ~80%, elite > 88%.

84%
18/19
451.56
Avg Passes

Total passes attempted per match — distribution volume. Top sides > 550, bottom sides < 400.

492.79
18/19
0.05
EWMAPossession Trend

Smoothed possession differential — team minus opponent. ±0.1 is normal, ±0.2 is strong dominance.

0.13

HT / FT Patterns

HT / FT Patternshalf-time vs full-time outcomes
1919
42%8/19
Leading at HT34%

Share of matches the team led at halftime — fast-start signal.

26%5/19
26%5/19
Level at HT

Share of matches level at halftime — balanced or low-tempo openings.

37%7/19
32%6/19
Trailing at HT

Share of matches the team trailed at halftime — slow starts (lower is better).

37%7/19
74%14/19
HT/FT Same Outcome55%

Share of matches where the W/D/L state at halftime matched the full-time result — game-state stability.

37%7/19
100%8/8
Led at HT → Won70%

Of matches led at HT, share converted into a full-time win — closing strength.

40%2/5
17%1/6
Trailed at HT → Recovered30%

Of matches trailing at HT, share rescued to a draw or win — comeback resilience.

43%3/7

Goal Timing

Goal Timingwhen goals happen
events 19/1919/191919
15%
0-15'16%

Hot starts — share of the team's goals scored in the opening 15 minutes.

16%
8%
16-30'9%

Early control — share scored between the 16th and 30th minute.

10%
27%
31-45'22%

Pre-HT push — share scored in the run-up to halftime.

16%
15%
46-60'22%

Restart wave — share scored in the first 15 minutes after HT.

29%
12%
61-75'12%

Game-state shift — share scored between minutes 61 and 75.

13%
23%
76-90+'20%

Late-game finishers — share scored from the 76th minute onwards (incl. stoppage time).

16%

First-Goal Edge

First-Goal Edgewho strikes first
events 19/1919/191919
50%9/18
Scored First47%

Share of matches where the team opened the scoring — fast-start signal.

44%8/18
50%9/18
Conceded First

Share of matches where the team conceded the opening goal (lower is better).

56%10/18
100%9/9
Win when Scoring First75%

Of matches the team scored first, share converted into a win — closing strength after the opener.

50%4/8
11%1/9
Win when Conceding First11%

Of matches conceding first, share rescued into a win — comeback strength.

10%1/10
30'
Avg Min. 1st Goal Scored

Average minute of the team's first goal — earlier means faster starters.

31'
28'
Avg Min. 1st Goal Conceded

Average minute of the first goal conceded — later is better (defense holds longer).

28'

Late-Game Strength

Late-Game Strengthafter the 75th minute
events 19/1919/191919
32%6/19
Scored after 75'29%

Share of matches with a late goal scored by the team — late finishers signal.

26%5/19
16%3/19
Conceded after 75'

Share of matches the team conceded a late goal — late-game vulnerability (lower is better).

32%6/19
100%7/7
Lead Saved after 75'90%

Of matches leading at 75', share closed out for a win — closing strength.

80%4/5
0%0/7
Lead Lost after 75'

Of matches leading at 75', share dropped to a draw or loss — late-game collapse risk.

20%1/5
16%3/19
Any Goal in Stoppage Time

Share of matches with any goal in stoppage time (90+) — late-drama frequency.

11%2/19

Set Pieces

Set Piecespenalty / own-goal share
events 19/1919/191919
85%22/26
Open-Play Share87%

Of the team's scored goals, share from open play — non-set-piece scoring quality.

90%28/31
15%4/26
Penalty Share

Of the team's scored goals, share from penalty kicks — penalty dependency.

10%3/31
0%0/26
Opp Own-Goal Bonus

Of the team's scored goals, share that were opponent own-goals — pressure / fortune.

0%0/31
5%1/19
Penalty Conceded Share

Of conceded goals, share from opponent penalties — defensive discipline (lower is better).

5%2/38
11%2/19
Own-Goal Cost

Of conceded goals, share that were the team's own goals — pressure-induced errors (lower is better).

0%0/38

Corners

Cornersset-piece pressure
1919
6.39
Avg Corners For

Average corners won per match — attacking territorial pressure (> 5.5 is heavy).

4.84
18/19
4.28
Avg Corners Against

Average corners conceded per match — territorial pressure faced (lower is better).

5.95
18/19
60%
Corner Share52%

Share of total corners in the team's matches that went to the team — territorial dominance ratio.

45%
18/19
0.47
EWMACorners Diff

Smoothed corner differential per match — long-term territorial advantage (±2 is strong).

-1.38
83%15/18
Match Corners > 8.571%

Share of matches with total corners > 8.5 (Over 8.5 line) — high-tempo encounter signal.

58%11/19
18/19
72%13/18
Match Corners > 9.562%

Share of matches with total corners > 9.5 (Over 9.5 line).

53%10/19
18/19
50%9/18
Match Corners > 10.551%

Share of matches with total corners > 10.5 (Over 10.5 line) — corner-heavy clashes only.

53%10/19
18/19

Cards & Discipline

Cards & Disciplineyellows, reds & fouls
events 19/1919/191919
1.89
Avg Yellow Cards

Yellow cards picked up per match — discipline signal (lower is better).

1.74
18/19
6%1/18
Red Card Match Rate

Share of matches with at least one red card to the team — sending-off risk.

5%1/19
18/19
11.56
Avg Fouls

Fouls committed per match — aggression / tactical-foul tendency (lower is calmer).

12.79
18/19
78%14/18
Match Cards > 3.575%

Share of matches with total card points (both teams, yellow=1 / red=2, 2Y→R counted as 2) > 3.5 — Over 3.5 line.

71%10/14
18/1914/19
50%9/18
Match Cards > 4.557%

Share of matches with total card points > 4.5 — Over 4.5 line.

64%9/14
18/1914/19
68%
Cards in 2nd Half

Share of card events that occur after halftime — late-discipline tendency.

56%

Venue Edge

Venue EdgeCambuur at home · AZ on the road
99
1.11
PPG at Venue

Points per match at the venue — home team at home, away team away.

1.11
33%3/9
Win Rate33%

Share of sampled matches won.

33%3/9
56%5/9
Loss Rate

Share of sampled matches lost (lower is better).

56%5/9
0.89
Avg Goals Scored

Goals scored per match across the sampled games.

0.89
1.11
Avg Goals Conceded

Goals conceded per match (lower is better).

1.89
33%3/9
Clean Sheet33%

Share of matches with no goals conceded.

33%3/9
44%4/9
BTTS44%

Share of matches where both teams scored.

44%4/9
44%4/9
Over 2.550%

Share of venue matches with total goals > 2.5.

56%5/9
1.42
EWMAAttack xG (EWMA)

Smoothed xG created at venue — long-term attacking strength in this fixture's venue context.

1.26
1.60
EWMADefense xG (EWMA)

Smoothed xG conceded at venue — defensive strength in this fixture's venue context (lower is better).

2.13