Czech Liga·
Regular Season - 28·04/04/2026·12:00
Plzen
Plzen
WWLLD
2-2
Finished
HT0-0
Teplice
Teplice
DDDLD
📍 Doosan Arena, Plzen
Season statsCzech Liga
Plzen26matchesTeplice26matches

Every panel below reflects each team's matches in Czech Liga.

Coverage varies by leaguetop-tier competitions have richer per-match data; lower divisions and smaller leagues track fewer metrics, so some panels may be sparse or missing entirely.
Pre-match snapshotevery value reflects each team's state going into kick-off — frozen before the match starts, not updated live.

Overall

Overallteam-strength snapshot
61%
Overall

Composite team strength — average of LTQ and Hype.

52%
1745
ELO

Chess-style strength rating going into kick-off.

1520
64%
LTQ

Long-term quality across all competitions.

52%
57%
Hype

Short-term fixture buzz / excitement signal.

52%
2.54
Momentum

Recent goal-scoring trend (weighted goals signal).

1.74

Match Outcome

Match Outcomeresults breakdown
2626
1.85
Points per Game

Average points per match across the sampled games (max 3).

1.08
54%
Win Rate

Share of sampled matches won.

23%
23%
Draw Rate

Share of sampled matches that ended level.

38%
23%
Loss Rate

Share of sampled matches lost (lower is better).

38%
35%
Clean Sheet37%

Share of matches with no goals conceded.

38%
19%
Failed to Score

Share of matches where the team didn't score (lower is better).

31%

Goal Scoring

Goal Scoringattacking output
2626
1.81
Avg Goals Scored

Goals scored per match across the sampled games.

0.96
81%
Scored > 0.575%

Share of matches where the team scored at least once.

69%
85%
Over 1.573%

Share of matches with total goals > 1.5.

62%
54%
Over 2.548%

Share of matches with total goals > 2.5.

42%
23%
Over 3.523%

Share of matches with total goals > 3.5 — high-scoring affairs.

23%
50%
BTTS50%

Share of matches where both teams scored.

50%
23%
BTTS & Win

Share of matches won while both teams scored — strong attack with a defensive lapse.

4%
46%
Scored Both Halves31%

Share of matches with a goal in both the 1st and 2nd half.

15%

Defensive Solidity

Defensive Soliditygoals & shots conceded
2626
1.19
Avg Goals Conceded

Goals conceded per match (lower is better).

1.19
11.31
Avg Shots Conceded

Total shots faced per match — defensive pressure (> 17.5/match is heavy siege).

13.04
4.23
Avg SoT Conceded

Shots on target faced per match — quality of chances given up (> 5.5 is severe).

4.38
3.12
Avg Saves

Goalkeeper saves per match (> 4.5 means the keeper is doing heavy lifting).

3.12
74%
Save %72%

Share of opponent shots on target stopped by the keeper.

71%
35%
Clean Sheet37%

Share of matches with no goals conceded.

38%

xG Trends

xG TrendsEWMA-smoothed performance
2626
1.90
EWMAxG For

Smoothed expected goals created per match — top attacks hit > 2.5/match, mid-table sits around 1.4.

1.16
1.47
EWMAxG Against

Smoothed expected goals conceded per match — elite defenses < 1.0, struggling sides > 2.0.

1.24
0.43
EWMAxG Diff

Net xG: attack minus defense. ±1 is dominant/poor; ±2 is title-contender or crisis-level.

-0.08
-0.19
EWMAFinishing Edge

Goals scored minus xG. +0.3 is clinical, −0.3 is wasteful; ±1 is statistical outlier.

-0.23
0.11
EWMAxG per Shot

Average chance quality per attempt — 0.10 is mid, 0.15+ means the team only shoots from dangerous spots.

0.11

Shots Quality

Shots Qualityvolume & accuracy
2626
16.12
Avg Shots

Total shots per match — pure attacking volume (> 16.5/match is elite).

10.19
5.81
Avg Shots on Target

Shots on target per match — strikes the keeper had to handle (> 5.5/match is heavy).

3.46
10.00
Avg Shots in Box

Shots taken from inside the penalty area — proximity to goal (> 8.5/match means consistent box presence).

5.96
62%
Box Shot %60%

Share of shots taken from inside the box — chance-selection quality. Mid sits ~60%, elite > 75%.

58%
36%
On-Target %35%

Share of shots that hit the target — striking accuracy. Mid ~33%, elite > 40%.

34%
11%
Shot Conversion10%

Goals per shot taken — clinical efficiency. ~10% is league average, > 15% is elite finishing.

9%

Possession & Passing

Possession & Passingball control
2626
56%
Avg Possession

Share of match time with the ball. > 55% is dominant, < 40% is reactive.

42%
78%
Pass Accuracy

Share of passes completed — distribution quality. Mid sits ~80%, elite > 88%.

68%
394.50
Avg Passes

Total passes attempted per match — distribution volume. Top sides > 550, bottom sides < 400.

293.23
0.13
EWMAPossession Trend

Smoothed possession differential — team minus opponent. ±0.1 is normal, ±0.2 is strong dominance.

-0.15

HT / FT Patterns

HT / FT Patternshalf-time vs full-time outcomes
2626
58%15/26
Leading at HT40%

Share of matches the team led at halftime — fast-start signal.

23%6/26
19%5/26
Level at HT

Share of matches level at halftime — balanced or low-tempo openings.

50%13/26
23%6/26
Trailing at HT

Share of matches the team trailed at halftime — slow starts (lower is better).

27%7/26
77%20/26
HT/FT Same Outcome73%

Share of matches where the W/D/L state at halftime matched the full-time result — game-state stability.

69%18/26
80%12/15
Led at HT → Won65%

Of matches led at HT, share converted into a full-time win — closing strength.

50%3/6
17%1/6
Trailed at HT → Recovered15%

Of matches trailing at HT, share rescued to a draw or win — comeback resilience.

14%1/7

Goal Timing

Goal Timingwhen goals happen
events 26/2626/262626
10%
0-15'13%

Hot starts — share of the team's goals scored in the opening 15 minutes.

15%
19%
16-30'17%

Early control — share scored between the 16th and 30th minute.

15%
23%
31-45'19%

Pre-HT push — share scored in the run-up to halftime.

15%
17%
46-60'14%

Restart wave — share scored in the first 15 minutes after HT.

11%
15%
61-75'18%

Game-state shift — share scored between minutes 61 and 75.

22%
17%
76-90+'19%

Late-game finishers — share scored from the 76th minute onwards (incl. stoppage time).

22%

First-Goal Edge

First-Goal Edgewho strikes first
events 26/2626/262626
72%18/25
Scored First67%

Share of matches where the team opened the scoring — fast-start signal.

62%13/21
28%7/25
Conceded First

Share of matches where the team conceded the opening goal (lower is better).

38%8/21
72%13/18
Win when Scoring First55%

Of matches the team scored first, share converted into a win — closing strength after the opener.

38%5/13
14%1/7
Win when Conceding First13%

Of matches conceding first, share rescued into a win — comeback strength.

13%1/8
27'
Avg Min. 1st Goal Scored

Average minute of the team's first goal — earlier means faster starters.

34'
24'
Avg Min. 1st Goal Conceded

Average minute of the first goal conceded — later is better (defense holds longer).

23'

Late-Game Strength

Late-Game Strengthafter the 75th minute
events 26/2626/262626
27%7/26
Scored after 75'27%

Share of matches with a late goal scored by the team — late finishers signal.

27%7/26
27%7/26
Conceded after 75'

Share of matches the team conceded a late goal — late-game vulnerability (lower is better).

23%6/26
86%12/14
Lead Saved after 75'71%

Of matches leading at 75', share closed out for a win — closing strength.

56%5/9
14%2/14
Lead Lost after 75'

Of matches leading at 75', share dropped to a draw or loss — late-game collapse risk.

44%4/9
0%0/26
Any Goal in Stoppage Time

Share of matches with any goal in stoppage time (90+) — late-drama frequency.

0%0/26

Set Pieces

Set Piecespenalty / own-goal share
events 26/2626/262626
94%45/48
Open-Play Share86%

Of the team's scored goals, share from open play — non-set-piece scoring quality.

78%21/27
4%2/48
Penalty Share

Of the team's scored goals, share from penalty kicks — penalty dependency.

15%4/27
2%1/48
Opp Own-Goal Bonus

Of the team's scored goals, share that were opponent own-goals — pressure / fortune.

7%2/27
10%3/30
Penalty Conceded Share

Of conceded goals, share from opponent penalties — defensive discipline (lower is better).

7%2/30
0%0/30
Own-Goal Cost

Of conceded goals, share that were the team's own goals — pressure-induced errors (lower is better).

3%1/30

Corners

Cornersset-piece pressure
2626
5.69
Avg Corners For

Average corners won per match — attacking territorial pressure (> 5.5 is heavy).

3.85
3.92
Avg Corners Against

Average corners conceded per match — territorial pressure faced (lower is better).

4.73
59%
Corner Share52%

Share of total corners in the team's matches that went to the team — territorial dominance ratio.

45%
1.59
EWMACorners Diff

Smoothed corner differential per match — long-term territorial advantage (±2 is strong).

-0.79
58%15/26
Match Corners > 8.554%

Share of matches with total corners > 8.5 (Over 8.5 line) — high-tempo encounter signal.

50%13/26
46%12/26
Match Corners > 9.540%

Share of matches with total corners > 9.5 (Over 9.5 line).

35%9/26
38%10/26
Match Corners > 10.531%

Share of matches with total corners > 10.5 (Over 10.5 line) — corner-heavy clashes only.

23%6/26

Cards & Discipline

Cards & Disciplineyellows, reds & fouls
events 26/2626/262626
2.00
Avg Yellow Cards

Yellow cards picked up per match — discipline signal (lower is better).

2.54
4%1/26
Red Card Match Rate

Share of matches with at least one red card to the team — sending-off risk.

15%4/26
12.31
Avg Fouls

Fouls committed per match — aggression / tactical-foul tendency (lower is calmer).

13.92
100%19/19
Match Cards > 3.593%

Share of matches with total card points (both teams, yellow=1 / red=2, 2Y→R counted as 2) > 3.5 — Over 3.5 line.

87%20/23
19/2623/26
74%14/19
Match Cards > 4.569%

Share of matches with total card points > 4.5 — Over 4.5 line.

65%15/23
19/2623/26
59%
Cards in 2nd Half

Share of card events that occur after halftime — late-discipline tendency.

64%

Venue Edge

Venue EdgePlzen at home · Teplice on the road
1313
1.92
PPG at Venue

Points per match at the venue — home team at home, away team away.

1.00
54%7/13
Win Rate35%

Share of sampled matches won.

15%2/13
15%2/13
Loss Rate

Share of sampled matches lost (lower is better).

31%4/13
1.69
Avg Goals Scored

Goals scored per match across the sampled games.

0.85
1.08
Avg Goals Conceded

Goals conceded per match (lower is better).

1.23
38%5/13
Clean Sheet35%

Share of matches with no goals conceded.

31%4/13
54%7/13
BTTS54%

Share of matches where both teams scored.

54%7/13
38%5/13
Over 2.538%

Share of venue matches with total goals > 2.5.

38%5/13
2.31
EWMAAttack xG (EWMA)

Smoothed xG created at venue — long-term attacking strength in this fixture's venue context.

1.09
1.41
EWMADefense xG (EWMA)

Smoothed xG conceded at venue — defensive strength in this fixture's venue context (lower is better).

1.45